Log in

View Full Version : Iran seeks condemnation of Israeli nukes



( R )evolution
20th December 2006, 03:10
By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 18 minutes ago

UNITED NATIONS -
Iran demanded Tuesday that the
U.N. Security Council condemn what it said was
Israel's clandestine development of nuclear weapons and "compel" it to place all its nuclear facilities under U.N. inspection.
ADVERTISEMENT

If Israel refuses to comply, Iran said the council must take "resolute action" under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter which authorizes a range of measures from diplomatic and economic sanctions to military action.

Iran insists its own nuclear program is a purely peaceful effort to develop energy, but the United States and many European nations believe Tehran's real aim in enriching uranium is to produce nuclear weapons. The Security Council is currently debating a resolution that would impose sanctions on Iran for refusing to suspend its enrichment program.

Iran's U.N. Ambassador Javad Zarif said in identical letters to the council and the secretary-general that the council's actions would show whether it was acting under the U.N. Charter or as "a tool" for a few permanent members who have encouraged Israel "to persist in its lawless behavior with impunity."

The reference appeared aimed at the United States, Israel's closest ally, which would almost certainly veto any council resolution on Israel's nuclear program.

Zarif said that Israel was the only obstacle to establishing a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East.

Israel has a longstanding policy of ambiguity on nuclear weapons, refusing to confirm or deny whether it has them. But in the German TV interview broadcast Dec. 12, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert listed Israel among countries that possess nuclear weapons.

Olmert's comments — which his office said were misinterpreted — came days after Robert Gates, who took over Monday as U.S. defense secretary, said in testimony to a Senate committee that Israel was a member of the club of nuclear-armed nations.

Israel's U.N. Mission had no immediate comment on Zarif's letters.

The Iranian ambassador insisted in the letters, obtained by the Associated Press, that Olmert's comments were a clear admission that Israel possessed nuclear weapons in violation of international law, the U.N. Charter and numerous Security Council and General Assembly resolutions.

What do you think?

kingbee
20th December 2006, 07:31
Well, it's the pot calling the kettle black: both Iran and Israel and the West and it's views on nukes. Even though it's completely hyppocritical, their calling the West's bluff on this one.

Sorry for the overuse of metaphors..

( R )evolution
20th December 2006, 07:45
It has been the policy of Israel since when they had or first rumored had of nukes that no public officals of the Israel goverement could ackonweldge that Israel had nukes because that would violate more then a few international agreements and I guess Olmert accidentaly or intenational let it slip. This is gonna be fun how the west and the un deals with Israel. It will be a great show of hypocrisy. And with any hope it will open a few peoples eyes

Guerrilla22
20th December 2006, 08:05
This is for show, in order for sanctiions to happen a vote would have to take place in the Security Council, where the uS has veto power.

Janus
30th December 2006, 08:39
Well now that Iran has been punished with sanctions for refusing to halt their nuclear program, it's pretty clear where the Security Council stands on this issue.

Jacob Peters
1st January 2007, 02:10
Well now that Iran has been punished with sanctions for refusing to halt their nuclear program, it's pretty clear where the Security Council stands on this issue.

The Security Council lacks any legal basis for demanding Iran to halts its enrichment of uranium. Hence, Iran is not being punished for violating law but instead she is unmerited aggression from imperialists in the Security Council.

Iran’s suspension of enrichment-related activities had been voluntary, not an act of compliance with any obligation under the NPT Treaty. Nor does the NPT Treaty require Iran to take steps prejudicing its right to enrich uranium in order to “build confidence”. Iran must allow the IAEA to inspect its programs, but it is under no obligation to suspend legitimate activities. In fact, although the IAEA may make such a request of Iran, it would be a violation of the NPT Treaty on the part of the IAEA to make this a requirement, as it would be clearly be an act prejudicing Iran’s right to enrich uranium for non-military purposes.
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=11544

Janus
1st January 2007, 23:51
The Security Council lacks any legal basis for demanding Iran to halts its enrichment of uranium
Outside of Iran's membership in the UN, then no.


but instead she is unmerited aggression from imperialists in the Security Council.
If there was any true aggression in the sanctions then the PRC and Russia would've come to Iran's aid and vetoed it.