Forward Union
16th December 2006, 11:36
Originally posted by
[email protected] 16, 2006 11:06 am
Why not? You are going to lose your job anyway? If all the workers are being fucked over and you have the theoretical knowledge to organize and fight back then why not do so?
Because it will alienate you from everybody else. Proposing immediate militant action will seem like an unreasonable proposal considering the fact that they truly believe that working through parliament will work.
If all you can do is assert otherwise, baring in mind that you are the strange new guy who has dropped in, then you will find yourself with a lack of credibility. And your politics wil become a novelty.
you could help them with their fight against the closure of the postal centre with direct action. You should use your knowledge of class-struggle for their benefit.
I intend to, but at the moment, direct action is not on the cards. To propose it would give the appearance that; I simply want a fight, for the sake of a fight, and have more concern for my ideological requirements than the immediate campaign (whetehr that's the case or not). I am a lot younger than the rest of the postal workers, and if called out as an Anarchist too soon, will have no crediblity to stand on. Simply because of the judgements made about people who carry that tag.
Because this sounds to me like the easy way out. I don't want to offend you and I am indeed not familiar with the entire situation but please give it some thought if you will.
No offence taken mate, I enjoy this kind of sensible debate... but understand, I'm not planning on sitting back and watching it all fall apart. Then saying "I told you so"
Pre-empting state violence by starting the fight yourself immediately closes and dramatically reduces your potential platform of support. It's also a short term solution, to a long term problem. Building up a network/union/etc however, to the extent that it becomes a threat, and then watching the state crack down, always leads to greater popular support.
After the legal, fluffy, process doesn't work, the movement (local or not) hit's a barrier, a barrier between legality and, essentially, victory (though victory is of course, far from inevitable). It either gives up to the legal process, or takes things further, and I would define this as revolutionary action. Someone has to be there to propose that step, someone who has credibility, trust, and clear dedication to the process. Not an ideological crusader who paradroped in.