Log in

View Full Version : The Molecular Condom



Cryotank Screams
13th December 2006, 01:40
Thought this was interesting, and exciting.



[b]A Molecular Condom Against AIDS

During Sex, Vaginal Gel Would Liquefy, Release Anti-HIV Drug

University of Utah scientists designed a "molecular condom" women could use daily to prevent AIDS by vaginally inserting a liquid that would turn into a gel-like coating and then, when exposed to semen, return to liquid form and release an antiviral drug.

"We have developed a new vaginal gel that we call a molecular condom because it is composed of molecules that are liquid at room temperature and, when applied in the vagina, will spread and turn into a gel and effectively coat the tissue," says Patrick Kiser, an assistant professor of bioengineering. "It's a smart molecular condom because we designed this gel to release anti-HIV drugs when the gel comes into contact with semen during intercourse."

"The ultimate hope for this technology is to protect women and their unborn or nursing children from the AIDS virus," but the molecular condom is five years away from tests in humans and roughly 10 years until it might be in widespread use, Kiser says.

Kiser and colleagues report development of the molecular condom in a study to be published online Monday, Dec. 11, 2006, in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

The molecular condom is part of a worldwide research effort to develop "microbicides" - drug-delivery systems such as gels, rings, sponges or creams to prevent infection by the human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted diseases. HIV causes AIDS, which cripples the immune system, leaving patients vulnerable to other infections, cancers and death.

Microbicides are seen as a way for women to gain power by protecting themselves from HIV, particularly in impoverished nations where AIDS is widespread, where rape is rampant or where conventional condoms are taboo, not reliably available or where men resist using them. Worldwide, most AIDS cases are spread heterosexually.

About 16 microbicides are in development and five are undergoing testing in thousands of women, mostly in Africa. They are designed to fight HIV infection by preventing the virus from entering cells or replicating, or by maintaining acidic vaginal conditions. No first-generation microbicide has been approved yet for wide use.

Delivering Anti-HIV Medicine When and Where Needed

Kiser says the University of Utah molecular condom would be a more advanced method of delivering an antiviral drug to prevent infection by the AIDS virus.

"Up until now, most of the microbicide work has focused on the development of the active drug, not on the delivery of the drug," Kiser says. "This study and other work in my lab are directed at developing new technologies for vaginal delivery of antiviral agents, particularly a microbicide that can respond to triggers that are present before, during and after intercourse. This is the first paper that begins to point in that direction."

Kiser says the dosage of anti-HIV drugs in first-generation microbicides lasts only a few hours, so "you have to use them an hour before sex, which is difficult. You only need one failure to get the disease. We're shooting for a microbicide delivery system that would be used once a day or once a month."

In the study, Kiser and colleagues outline how they designed a water-based gel or "hydrogel" sensitive to body temperature and pH (acidity or alkalinity) so that it could serve as a "smart semen-triggered vaginal microbiocidal vehicle."

The researchers have not yet tried incorporating an antiviral drug into the hydrogel, but showed that in laboratory conditions, the substance turns from a liquid to a gel at body temperature, then returns to liquid form and can release test compounds - stand-ins for antiAIDS drugs - when exposed to semen, which has a pH of 7.5, more alkaline than the acidic vaginal pH of 4 to 5.

Kiser conducted the research with University of Utah bioengineering graduate students Kavita Gupta and Meredith Roberts, and undergraduates Scott Barnes and Rachel Tangaro. The research is part of Gupta's doctoral thesis, and she did much of the work. Other coauthors of the study were bioengineers David Katz and Derek Owen at Duke University in Durham, N.C. The National Institutes of Health funded the study.

Designing a Microbicide to Empower Women

First-generation microbicides now being tested are expected to be available within four years and be 50 percent to 60 percent effective. That sounds low, but a British study found that even if a microbicide was only 50 percent effective against HIV and used by only 20 percent of the women in 73 developing nations, it would prevent 2.5 million infections during a three-year period. Kiser says he hopes the molecular condom will prove to be 90 percent effective.

Potential side effects of microbicides include itching, increased vaginal discharge and inflammation. But initial testing of the molecular condom - in which the hydrogel was tested on basic tissue cells known as mouse fibroblasts - "indicates these gels are likely to be well tolerated," Kiser says.

What about the comfort of a thin gel lining the vagina? "At the end of the day, women will use a material that protects them," he says. "But there is no reason to think these gels are uncomfortable."

The molecular condom is a polymer - a molecule with a repeating, chain-like structure - made from three chemicals in these proportions:

80 parts of N-isopropylacrylamide.

15 parts of butyl methacrylate, which is used in coatings, adhesives, solvents, resins, oil additives and to finish leather and paper.

Five parts acrylic acid, which is used in lubricant and spermicidal gels.
"The three together have the property of liquid at room temperature and vaginal pH, solid at body temperature and vaginal pH, and liquid at body temperature and semen pH," Kiser says.

Other researchers previously discovered this combination of chemicals forms a heat-sensitive gel, but Kiser and colleagues altered the polymer so it would change from liquid to gel and back at the desired temperature and pH. They also designed the gel so it would not dehydrate vaginal cells, which can trigger infections.

The researchers analyzed and optimized the gel's ability to adhere to a surface similar to vaginal tissue without being diluted by other fluids, but to erode rapidly in the presence of seminal fluid. Kiser says first-generation microbicides use gels like those in spermicides and lubricants, and are not optimized to coat and be retained in the vagina.

A Burst of Anti-AIDS Medicine

Kiser, Gupta and colleagues demonstrated how the polymer could change from liquid to gel at body temperature, then return to liquid form when exposed to simulated seminal fluid - a sticky mixture of sugars and salt-and release large and small molecules used as stand-ins for real medicines in drug-delivery experiments.

In the experiments, when the hydrogel molecular condom was exposed to mock seminal fluid, it released 49 percent of the small-molecule drug within five minutes and 81 percent within an hour. It released 48 percent of the large molecule drug within 30 minutes and 66 percent in 90 minutes.

The lab experiments were designed to make it difficult for the molecular condom to release simulated drugs, Kiser says. Inside a woman, the gel would be much thinner than in the lab tests, so antiviral drugs "would all be released in just a few minutes."

Kiser hopes to incorporate experimental anti-AIDS drugs known as entry inhibitors into the molecular condom.

Article I (http://www.emaxhealth.com/48/8543.html)
Article II (http://health.syndicatehealth.com/article/20061108/HEALTHNEWS/2497)
Article III (http://www.interestalert.com/story/siteia.shtml?Story=st/sn/12110004aaa060aa.nw&Sys=zzn&Type=News&Filter=Health/Science&Fid=HELTHSCI)

Pawn Power
13th December 2006, 02:40
Very interesting and seems somewhat hopeful even though it is more then ten years away.

No doubt the Vatican will be opposed to its use.

chimx
13th December 2006, 08:50
i'll let you volunteer yourself for the human trials.

Rollo
13th December 2006, 08:54
Originally posted by Pawn [email protected] 13, 2006 12:40 pm
Very interesting and seems somewhat hopeful even though it is more then ten years away.

No doubt the Vatican will be opposed to its use.
Why is that? As far as I can see it isn't a birth control.

Dooga Aetrus Blackrazor
13th December 2006, 11:27
Originally posted by Rollo+December 13, 2006 01:54 am--> (Rollo @ December 13, 2006 01:54 am)
Pawn [email protected] 13, 2006 12:40 pm
Very interesting and seems somewhat hopeful even though it is more then ten years away.

No doubt the Vatican will be opposed to its use.
Why is that? As far as I can see it isn't a birth control. [/b]
Aids is what God uses to punish people silly. That's why gays have so much aids.

Rollo
13th December 2006, 11:44
I'm sick of that crap " god works in mysterious ways ". Some girl was at a beach swimming with her church group and a shark ripped off one of her arms and killed her. I asked someone why and they said god loved her so much he wanted her to come to heaven to be with him. Kinda funny, if I was god I would ASK people if they wanted to come, why the hell would you send a shark to horribly maul someone to invite them over?

Pawn Power
13th December 2006, 14:36
Originally posted by Rollo+December 13, 2006 03:54 am--> (Rollo @ December 13, 2006 03:54 am)
Pawn [email protected] 13, 2006 12:40 pm
Very interesting and seems somewhat hopeful even though it is more then ten years away.

No doubt the Vatican will be opposed to its use.
Why is that? As far as I can see it isn't a birth control. [/b]
The Catholic Church does not support any types of contraceptives. Their line is abstinence -handing out bibles in the aids ridden parts of Afrika instead of condoms killing millions yearly.

Rollo
13th December 2006, 14:43
I'm not a big religion buff, never have been. I was raised atheist so this catholic church stuff is all new to me.

Pawn Power
13th December 2006, 14:53
Originally posted by [email protected] 13, 2006 09:43 am
I'm not a big religion buff, never have been. I was raised atheist so this catholic church stuff is all new to me.
You mean you were raised "nothing" and therefor no impetus to believe in gods.

Or did your parents raise you telling you"there is no god"?

A six year old doesnt get up and say "jesus is my savior," s/he has to be tought that. However if these thing are not taught, why would so many intrinsically come to believe in the same magic sky wizard?

The answer is they wouldn't.

No one has to raise you as a "non-believer," only the other way around.

Rollo
13th December 2006, 15:04
They just didn't tell me about jesus or god. When I came of age and we were doing scripture ( religion ) in primary school I first herd about god.

Red Party
13th December 2006, 15:14
I hate the church, when will these believers realize that there is no god.

chimx
13th December 2006, 16:29
if i'm not mistaken, the vatican came out in support of the use of condoms a few years ago to deter the spread of aids.

Pawn Power
13th December 2006, 16:49
Originally posted by [email protected] 13, 2006 11:29 am
if i'm not mistaken, the vatican came out in support of the use of condoms a few years ago to deter the spread of aids.
Really? Do you have a source?

Jazzratt
13th December 2006, 21:08
Originally posted by [email protected] 13, 2006 08:50 am
i'll let you volunteer yourself for the human trials.
Why? We've got plenty of horny animals that aren't doing much.

ichneumon
13th December 2006, 21:15
this is flat out useless to 99% of the people who are actually threatened by HIV, because they can't afford it and wouldn't have access to it any way. that little study about developing countries was a big "if" - as in "if they weren't poor".

this would not prevent the spread of HIV in any significant way, it's just another high tech gadget that western civ can waste resources developing. it's sad, actually.

Sean
13th December 2006, 21:27
The Catholic Church does not support any types of contraceptives. Their line is abstinence -handing out bibles in the aids ridden parts of Afrika instead of condoms killing millions yearly.
You forgot the ever-so-reliable Coitus Interruptus. They might not care if people die of AIDS, but at least they appreciate a pearl necklace. :P

Anything that can stop the spread of AIDS has to be a good thing, of course.

Jazzratt
13th December 2006, 21:59
Originally posted by [email protected] 13, 2006 09:15 pm
this is flat out useless to 99% of the people who are actually threatened by HIV, because they can't afford it and wouldn't have access to it any way. that little study about developing countries was a big "if" - as in "if they weren't poor".

this would not prevent the spread of HIV in any significant way, it's just another high tech gadget that western civ can waste resources developing. it's sad, actually.
You're exaclt like the romatiscists that argue against the industrialisation of industries, you ignore completely that post-revolution your critiscms will mean nothing. It's better to have all the technology possible developed to its best possible level so that when the revolution comes we aren't fart-arsing around with technology we could have had years before.

ichneumon
14th December 2006, 01:45
It's better to have all the technology possible developed to its best possible level so that when the revolution comes we aren't fart-arsing around with technology we could have had years before

uh, excuse the hell out of me for trying to save lives NOW instead of waiting for the sky to fall....

Jazzratt
14th December 2006, 01:48
Originally posted by [email protected] 14, 2006 01:45 am

It's better to have all the technology possible developed to its best possible level so that when the revolution comes we aren't fart-arsing around with technology we could have had years before

uh, excuse the hell out of me for trying to save lives NOW instead of waiting for the sky to fall....
How the fuck are you saving lives by opposing life saving technologies on the basis that in the current system they won't be widly available.

Also I assume by your "sky falling" comment you don't think there will ever be a revolution?

ichneumon
14th December 2006, 02:50
How the fuck are you saving lives by opposing life saving technologies on the basis that in the current system they won't be widly available.

Also I assume by your "sky falling" comment you don't think there will ever be a revolution?

i'm suggesting that the money could have been spent more wisely. given, this is a phd project, and not a multi-million dollar pharmaceutical industry lark, but still, it's not at all practical. the bit about saving lives in the 3rd world was complete BS.

actually, "the insurgency began, and ya missed it." i live the revolution, i'm suggesting that you not wait.

Chocobo
14th December 2006, 04:21
Glad to see funding for these types of recent research isn't going to waste. This seems like a great invention, and has high potential for great use. But what does bother me is, who thinks of the concept idea for all this? :mellow: Like, how either "out there" inventor do you have to be, or just plain intelligent (Which very well tie as the same thing in most cases).

Cryotank Screams
14th December 2006, 22:56
Originally posted by [email protected] 14, 2006 12:21 am
Like, how either "out there" inventor do you have to be, or just plain intelligent (Which very well tie as the same thing in most cases).
A scientist once credited LSD, that helped him led to his discovery, ;) .

I forget the name of the scientist though, :( .

MolotovLuv
14th December 2006, 23:48
DNA was discovered on LSD:

DNA & LSD (http://www.miqel.com/entheogens/francis_crick_dna_lsd.html)

Cryotank Screams
15th December 2006, 00:04
Originally posted by [email protected] 14, 2006 07:48 pm
DNA was discovered on LSD:

DNA & LSD (http://www.miqel.com/entheogens/francis_crick_dna_lsd.html)
I thought it was that but I was unsure, thanks for the link too, :) .

Janus
16th December 2006, 00:54
The problem as always is getting this to the people in the regions who need it the most.

Pawn Power
16th December 2006, 14:44
It is to be remembered that this would not prevent other types of STDs.