Log in

View Full Version : Major shift in Best Buy's worker schedules



Janus
7th December 2006, 21:20
This article kinda caught my eye while I was glancing through the news so I thought I'd share it with y'all.


One afternoon last year, Chap Achen, who oversees online orders at Best Buy Co., shut down his computer, stood up from his desk, and announced that he was leaving for the day. It was around 2 p.m., and most of Achen's staff were slumped over their keyboards, deep in a post-lunch, LCD-lit trance. "See you tomorrow," said Achen. "I'm going to a matinee."

Under normal circumstances, an early-afternoon departure would have been totally un-Achen. After all, this was a 37-year-old corporate comer whose wife laughs in his face when he utters the words "work-life balance." But at Best Buy's Minneapolis headquarters, similar incidents of strangeness were breaking out all over the ultramodern campus. In employee relations, Steve Hance had suddenly started going hunting on workdays, a Remington 12-gauge in one hand, a Verizon LG in the other. In the retail training department, e-learning specialist Mark Wells was spending his days bombing around the country following rocker Dave Matthews. Single mother Kelly McDevitt, an online promotions manager, started leaving at 2:30 p.m. to pick up her 11-year-old son Calvin from school. Scott Jauman, a Six Sigma black belt, began spending a third of his time at his Northwoods cabin.

At most companies, going AWOL during daylight hours would be grounds for a pink slip. Not at Best Buy. The nation's leading electronics retailer has embarked on a radical--if risky--experiment to transform a culture once known for killer hours and herd-riding bosses. The endeavor, called ROWE, for "results-only work environment," seeks to demolish decades-old business dogma that equates physical presence with productivity. The goal at Best Buy is to judge performance on output instead of hours.

Hence workers pulling into the company's amenity-packed headquarters at 2 p.m. aren't considered late. Nor are those pulling out at 2 p.m. seen as leaving early. There are no schedules. No mandatory meetings. No impression-management hustles. Work is no longer a place where you go, but something you do. It's O.K. to take conference calls while you hunt, collaborate from your lakeside cabin, or log on after dinner so you can spend the afternoon with your kid.

Best Buy did not invent the post-geographic office. Tech companies have been going bedouin for several years. At IBM, 40% of the workforce has no official office; at AT&T, a third of managers are untethered. Sun Microsystems Inc. calculates that it's saved $400 million over six years in real estate costs by allowing nearly half of all employees to work anywhere they want. And this trend seems to have legs. A recent Boston Consulting Group study found that 85% of executives expect a big rise in the number of unleashed workers over the next five years. In fact, at many companies the most innovative new product may be the structure of the workplace itself.

But arguably no big business has smashed the clock quite so resolutely as Best Buy. The official policy for this post-face-time, location-agnostic way of working is that people are free to work wherever they want, whenever they want, as long as they get their work done. "This is like TiVo for your work," says the program's co-founder, Jody Thompson. By the end of 2007, all 4,000 staffers working at corporate will be on ROWE. Starting in February, the new work environment will become an official part of Best Buy's recruiting pitch as well as its orientation for new hires. And the company plans to take its clockless campaign to its stores--a high-stakes challenge that no company has tried before in a retail environment.

Another thing about this experiment: It wasn't imposed from the top down. It began as a covert guerrilla action that spread virally and eventually became a revolution. So secret was the operation that Chief Executive Brad Anderson only learned the details two years after it began transforming his company. Such bottom-up, stealth innovation is exactly the kind of thing Anderson encourages. The Best Buy chief aims to keep innovating even when something is ostensibly working. "ROWE was an idea born and nurtured by a handful of passionate employees," he says. "It wasn't created as the result of some edict."

So bullish are Anderson and his team on the idea that they have formed a subsidiary called CultureRx, set up to help other companies go clockless. CultureRx expects to sign up at least one large client in the coming months.

The CEO may have bought in, but there has been plenty of opposition inside the company. Many execs wondered if the program was simply flextime in a prettier bottle. Others felt that working off-site would lead to longer hours and destroy forever the demarcation between work and personal time. Cynics thought it was all a PR stunt dreamed up by Machiavellian operatives in human resources. And as ROWE infected one department after the other, its supporters ran into old-guard saboteurs, who continue to plot an overthrow and spread warnings of a coming paradise for slackers.

Then again, the new work structure's proponents say it's helping Best Buy overcome challenges. And thanks to early successes, some of the program's harshest critics have become true believers. With gross margins on electronics under pressure, and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Target Corp. shouldering into Best Buy territory, the company has been moving into services, including its Geek Squad and "customer centricity" program in which salespeople act as technology counselors. But Best Buy was afflicted by stress, burnout, and high turnover. The hope was that ROWE, by freeing employees to make their own work-life decisions, could boost morale and productivity and keep the service initiative on track.

It seems to be working. Since the program's implementation, average voluntary turnover has fallen drastically, CultureRx says. Meanwhile, Best Buy notes that productivity is up an average 35% in departments that have switched to ROWE. Employee engagement, which measures employee satisfaction and is often a barometer for retention, is way up too, according to the Gallup Organization, which audits corporate cultures.

ROWE may also help the company pay for the customer centricity campaign. The endeavor is hugely expensive because it involves tailoring stores to local markets and training employees to turn customer feedback into new business ideas. By letting people work off-campus, Best Buy figures it can reduce the need for corporate office space, perhaps rent out the empty cubicles to other companies, and plow the millions of dollars in savings into its services initiative.

Phyllis Moen, a University of Minnesota sociology professor who researches work-life issues, is studying the Best Buy experiment in a project sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. She says most companies are stuck in the 1930s when it comes to employees' and managers' relationships to time and work. "Our whole notion of paid work was developed within an assembly line culture," Moen says. "Showing up was work. Best Buy is recognizing that sitting in a chair is no longer working."

Full article (http://biz.yahoo.com/special/allbiz120606_article1.html)

Phalanx
7th December 2006, 21:46
Definately a good start. Other companies will surely follow suit once the capitalists realize that many hours don't equal output.

violencia.Proletariat
7th December 2006, 21:50
So it seems management is getting time off while the workers at the stores and warehouses still work full days? Yeah thats great :rolleyes:

Phalanx
7th December 2006, 21:57
I think they're just testing it on the headquarters before they switch the rest of their stores over to ROWE.

That said, it's not a solution.

bcbm
7th December 2006, 22:00
Originally posted by Tatanka [email protected] 07, 2006 03:46 pm
Definately a good start. Other companies will surely follow suit once the capitalists realize that many hours don't equal output.
A good start for what? The demands of the reformists and the actions of the capitalists are merging... what does that tell us?

violencia.Proletariat
7th December 2006, 22:04
Originally posted by Tatanka [email protected] 07, 2006 05:57 pm
I think they're just testing it on the headquarters before they switch the rest of their stores over to ROWE.

That said, it's not a solution.
Um how exactly could they switch this over to stores? Floor workers and distribution workers have to work constantly therefore they cant take off in the middle of the day. Management would have a nightmare with the scheduling and would never let this happen.

What this seems to be is a little program for upper level management and some specialist office workers. I'm sorry but I don't see how the bourgeoisie getting more time off is helpful to us or should be celebrated in any way.

Phalanx
7th December 2006, 22:06
I'd rather see some progress instead of no progress (workers getting better conditions). I'm not saying, by any means, that this is a solution. The only solution is to overthrow the ruling classes, but it doesn't hurt to see improvements in workers' rights.


What this seems to be is a little program for upper level management and some specialist office workers. I'm sorry but I don't see how the bourgeoisie getting more time off is helpful to us or should be celebrated in any way.

The way I interpreted it sounded like they'd be switching their stores to these types of hours. I may have misunderstood.

Janus
7th December 2006, 22:25
The way I interpreted it sounded like they'd be switching their stores to these types of hours.
Not yet, they plan on applying it to their retail stores next year. Right now, it's being tested in the Best Buy offices. Of course, there is also the possibility that the execs. will pull the plug on the program if it doesn't become as successful as they originally planned.

classwarveteran
7th December 2006, 23:31
I have a feeling their implementation on the floor may end-up resulting in simply having people work harder for shorter periods of time (or off the clock). So, yes, they can leave "early," but then they won't have enough money to pay the bills. Just another way of working oneself into a grave.

This aspect isn't as significant to those who are salaried or in higher level management. Hey, maybe Best Buy can pass this off as part of their progressive image while keeping more people part time so they don't have to pay as many benefits (including workers comp., unemployment, etc.).

Call me a bitter old Wobbly, but I'm always skeptical when I hear these things. Remember what the article said, it's still all about productivity, and as long as Best Buy can make more money off their workers' backs, why wouldn't they implement the policy?

bcbm
8th December 2006, 06:47
Originally posted by Tatanka [email protected] 07, 2006 04:06 pm
I'd rather see some progress instead of no progress (workers getting better conditions).
Historically, this sort of progress has only been the bosses' attempts to smash insubordination in workers and increase their control over our lives. From the article posted, this policy seems no different. They only want people around when they will be "productive," attempting to neutralize the possibilty of work slow-downs, sabotage, theft, absenteeism, or "doing nothing," and other means through which workers express dissatisfaction and build rage against their social conditions. Not to use a tired saying, but "bigger cages, longer chains." This is social control, period, and we should be concerned when the capitalists are saying the same things as the "progressives."



The way I interpreted it sounded like they'd be switching their stores to these types of hours. I may have misunderstood.

How could you run a retail outlet if employees just left whenver they felt like, or didn't show up?

SPK
8th December 2006, 09:37
Originally posted by black banner black [email protected] 08, 2006 01:47 am
Historically, this sort of progress has only been the bosses' attempts to smash insubordination in workers and increase their control over our lives…
How could you run a retail outlet if employees just left whenever they felt like, or didn't show up?
I agree with BBBG: I don’t understand fully how this policy could be applied to a retail outlet. There may be back-office responsibilities at a store that can be done in accordance with these new policies, but on the sales floor, workers have to always be available to customers – they can’t just walk away when they feel like it (at least from the bosses' standpoint they can’t :P).

And, as someone in the usa who has worked both from home and from an office cube, I also agree that these policies are, in part, designed to exercise further control over workers’ lives and neutralize potential resistance. Labor union strategies, for example, have focused almost exclusively on organizing traditional workplaces, like a factory or office. Best Buy’s new approach – which, as the article notes, is increasingly being taken up by other firms – eliminates the traditional workplace totally, and workers are physically dispersed – mostly in their own, personal offices at home. So unions would have to figure out new tactics to organize such folks – I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for that to happen. <_<

One of the more important reasons why corporations are moving to “virtual” offices – working from home or anyplace where you can access a network – is that it reduces their immediate operating costs and thereby increase profits directly. Specifically, many costs traditionally handled by companies are displaced onto workers. How? Companies need less real estate for permanent offices. Who then pays for your office? You – the worker -- do. In practice, it is difficult to work from home without having a separate room for your desk (imagine trying to work while there are children running around you all the time :lol:). That is manifested as increased rent for the extra room, for example. Companies also don’t pay for fixtures or furniture. Who pays for a decent chair that won’t give you carpal tunnel syndrome while you bang on your PC all day? You do. Companies also no longer pay for certain ongoing costs, like utilities. Want to keep your house cool in the summer or warm in winter, while you work? That’s your problem now. I’ve heard of certain firms that pay for high-speed internet connections or voice connections (like a cell phone), but, again, that’s mostly the worker’s responsibility. Also, I haven&#39;t heard about specific legal rulings in the usa, but I would expect that occupational safety and health regulations, as well as workers&#39; compensation for on-the-job injuries, would no longer apply to home offices -- since those are not spaces that companies directly control.

These new strategies also have the effect of, at least temporarily, deferring certain demands by the working class for employers to provide childcare / child-minding and eldercare benefits. Because of the tremendous expense of childcare, the burden of which falls on individual parents, there is a definite tendency for workers – usually women – to try and care for their kids during business hours (these days, it is not at all uncommon to see children running about in traditional offices). Pushing the office space into the home only intensifies this tendency. (This probably won’t remain the case in the long run, though.)

Finally, from a more long-term perspective: Capitalists want to be able to take advantage of low-wage areas of the world, whether it is another city in the usa or another country entirely. These new strategies allow them to do so. Are workers in New York City or Los Angeles or Chicago or San Francisco too expensive (because those cities are quite expensive)? No problem&#33; Having virtual offices means that you can hire cheaper labor in less expensive cities like, say, Peoria (no offense to any RevLefters from Peoria, of course). Better yet, you can hire folks in places like India or China or Bulgaria, where basic labor costs are as low as 20% of those in the usa. So what Best Buy is doing is part of the effort to ultimately exploit the vast workforces opened up by the collapse of the Soviet Bloc and the ascendancy of global neoliberalism.

The specific service workers and members of the middle class, to which this these new “flextime” and working-from-home techniques were initially applied, have little real power in terms of labor union representation and so on. So these strategies cannot reasonably be seen as a concession or benefit or reform. The kind of new strategy seen at Best Buy should be viewed as simply another method for capitalists to organize the workplace in their own interests and to maximize their profits.

(edit -- added note on safety / workers&#39; comp)

R_P_A_S
8th December 2006, 10:10
Originally posted by black banner black gun+December 07, 2006 10:00 pm--> (black banner black gun @ December 07, 2006 10:00 pm)
Tatanka [email protected] 07, 2006 03:46 pm
Definately a good start. Other companies will surely follow suit once the capitalists realize that many hours don&#39;t equal output.
A good start for what? The demands of the reformists and the actions of the capitalists are merging... what does that tell us? [/b]
it tells us that the capitalist are slowly convincing the proletariat to "join the alliance for progress" :rolleyes:

bcbm
8th December 2006, 17:59
Originally posted by [email protected] 08, 2006 04:10 am
it tells us that the capitalist are slowly convincing the proletariat to "join the alliance for progress" :rolleyes:
The capitalists have wanted the poor to embrace their "progress" since the beginning of the industrial revolution- something "leftists" have played an unfortunate role in as well.