Restricted?

[C_Rasmussen]

Now why was I restricted? I never made any racist, sexist, homophobic, or anti-semetic comments. Sure I've had some intense flamefests with certain members that could be almost seen as trolling but that was never my intention when I came here. How did I fuck up?

[More Fire for the People]

You made a joke about breaking up strikers so that you could have beer. :/

[RedAnarchist]

C_Ras, don't make a new thread about your restriction, you'll only get in more trouble. I'm not saying this to be offensive, just saying.

[C_Rasmussen]

Originally posted by Hopscotch [email protected] 20, 2006 04:42 pm
You made a joke about breaking up strikers so that you could have beer. :/
Ah that comment. Ok let me clear myself up on that one. I didn't mean the workers should just sit there and take whats coming to them. I meant its good that they didn't strike so they wouldn't potentially lose their jobs because they went on strike and their superiors would fire them. Never meant any harm by that comment.

[Delirium]

i certainly dont support your restriction

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by C_Rasmussen+November 20, 2006 11:45 pm--> (C_Rasmussen @ November 20, 2006 11:45 pm)
Hopscotch [email protected] 20, 2006 04:42 pm
You made a joke about breaking up strikers so that you could have beer. :/
Ah that comment. Ok let me clear myself up on that one. I didn't mean the workers should just sit there and take whats coming to them. I meant its good that they didn't strike so they wouldn't potentially lose their jobs because they went on strike and their superiors would fire them. Never meant any harm by that comment. [/b]
I can see what you mean, but wouldn't you rather they had better working conditions/wages in a job than have to put up with the status quo? Sometimes you need to act to change things for the better.

[C_Rasmussen]

Originally posted by ThisAnarchistKillsNazis+November 20, 2006 04:47 pm--> (ThisAnarchistKillsNazis @ November 20, 2006 04:47 pm)
Originally posted by [email protected] 20, 2006 11:45 pm

Hopscotch [email protected] 20, 2006 04:42 pm
You made a joke about breaking up strikers so that you could have beer. :/
Ah that comment. Ok let me clear myself up on that one. I didn't mean the workers should just sit there and take whats coming to them. I meant its good that they didn't strike so they wouldn't potentially lose their jobs because they went on strike and their superiors would fire them. Never meant any harm by that comment.
I can see what you mean, but wouldn't you rather they had better working conditions/wages in a job than have to put up with the status quo? Sometimes you need to act to change things for the better. [/b]
I honestly believe in things being better for the worker in question. Sure I'd like to see them have suitable working conditions but if they get fired they wouldn't get that but I do understand where you're coming from as well.

[Delirium]

Originally posted by C_Rasmussen+November 20, 2006 05:50 pm--> (C_Rasmussen @ November 20, 2006 05:50 pm)
Originally posted by [email protected] 20, 2006 04:47 pm

Originally posted by [email protected] 20, 2006 11:45 pm

Hopscotch [email protected] 20, 2006 04:42 pm
You made a joke about breaking up strikers so that you could have beer. :/
Ah that comment. Ok let me clear myself up on that one. I didn't mean the workers should just sit there and take whats coming to them. I meant its good that they didn't strike so they wouldn't potentially lose their jobs because they went on strike and their superiors would fire them. Never meant any harm by that comment.
I can see what you mean, but wouldn't you rather they had better working conditions/wages in a job than have to put up with the status quo? Sometimes you need to act to change things for the better.
I honestly believe in things being better for the worker in question. Sure I'd like to see them have suitable working conditions but if they get fired they wouldn't get that but I do understand where you're coming from as well. [/b]
striking is the best option for them to better their conditions. where would workers be today without union and strikes? we would still be working 14 hour days with no benifits, 6 days a week.

Though it may cause some short term hardship, it is important to support worker actions for the long term goal of a classless society.

[Hegemonicretribution]

I won't comment on the restriction, but I do have to say I support striking because it is not only beneficial, it is essential for making necessary gains against the state and private sector.

Would you claim that all action should be within the sphere of existing law so that workers do not get imprisoned? This is not remotely workable, and would lead one into a democratic-socialist position; that is an anti-revolutionary position.

To oppose striking, regardless of intent, is to misunderstand a key principle of revolutionary theory.

[KC]

It wasn't just your comment about how workers shouldn't strike so you can have your beer. Many members chose to restrict you because of your blatant sexism and also the fact that you hardly post politically here, if at all.

[Sadena Meti]

Wait... so c_ras is restricted and peaceful_anarchist is unrestricted?

Next thing we know MLS will be elected to the CC...

[Rollo]

I was going to mention this post until I saw how old it was. I'll mention it anyway.

http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php...st&p=1291876209 (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?act=ST&f=8&t=36094&hl=&view=findpost&p=1291876209)

[Janus]

READ READ READ (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=22496)

Stop making threads about your restrictions! There is already a thread for such discussions.