Originally posted by rev-
[email protected] 06, 2006 09:47 am
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42265000/gif/_42265514_china_reserve_gra416.gif
China has been buying up dollars over the past years to prop up the value of the us currency. If the dollar depreciated vis-a-vis the Chinese yuan, that means the vaunted amerikan consumer would have to shell out more in dollars to get the equivalent of one yuan. And that, in turn, means that all of the goods the us imports from China, and there is a lot of them if you ever check out your local WalMart :lol: , would be more expensive. The Chinese government does not want its key export markets harmed, since its economy is still primarily export-driven. The internal, local market is growing, but still not big enough to keep the Chinese economy expanding at its current rate, which is close to 10%. The speculation is that the CPC regime there fears a major economic slowdown, since increasing wealth is about the only thing they have to legitimate and validate their rule. The regime is not democratic, butchered untold numbers of people at Tiannanmen Square, has massively increased class divisions, and is riven with corruption, so they should be worried.
This buying up of dollars has enabled the mind-boggling deficits that the usa currently has. The federal government gets to borrow more money, i.e. print it, because China (and others) are buying lots of treasury bonds -- i.e. sending the usa money to get a promised amount of dollars in the future. What is the government here borrowing money for? The war in Iraq, among other things. This increases the federal budget deficit. China's policy also enables, of course, the tremendous increase in the balance of payments problem, i.e. the trade deficit. To buy all of the goodies manufactured in China, the usa sends them dollars, and right now there are about eight-hundred billion more dollars flowing out of the country than coming into the country, every year. That situation would be bad if the government didn't print more money, since the usa would eventually run out of currency reserves -- then, boom, no more dollars to buy China's goodies (this situation has arisen historically in other countries). So the purchase of treasury bonds, and the printing of further dollars, is critical to maintaining that trade imbalance.
One thing is a given. China may have one trillion dollars in reserves, but they sure as hell aren't going to get one trillion dollars of goods or services directly out of that, beyond the maintenance of their export markets. If the central bank there tried to dump their dollars, the value of the us currency would collapse globally, and that would significantly reduce the true value of China's remaining holdings -- once dollars start getting sold off, many other central banks would quickly follow suit, in an attempt to realize their returns or at least break even. There would be too many dollars on the market to find buyers, and what sucker would want to buy dollars at that point anyway?
China has been attempting to reduce its holdings by purchasing big-ticket items in the usa, with dollars from its reserve. CNOOC, a Chinese state oil firm, attempted to buy out the amerikan oil company Unocal a few years ago. The government here, amidst spasms of xenophobic nationalism, did not approve the merger. This obviously makes many countries that have significant dollar holdings skeptical that they will be to make actual investments in the usa with that money. Those countries include, for example, major oil producing states in the Arab world (which have lots of dollars from the recent run-up in oil prices) that are not likely to get a friendlier reception than China did.
This situation is rife with ironies and is clearly not sustainable. If there is any country that is going to give the usa a real kick in the teeth – I mean something way beyond the impending defeat in Iraq – it will be China. They could knock the usa out of the imperial game the way that the usa knocked out Britain and France during the Suez crisis in 1956. :D
(edited for grammar)