View Full Version : Marxist-Leninism
Module
4th November 2006, 04:51
What is it really?
I've seen many a person call themselves "Marxist-Leninist" and today my sister was encountered by a "Marxist-Leninist" group that asked her to join.. without explaining what Marxism even was... <_<
But. yes...
Isn't Leninism Marxist enough for Leninists not to need the word 'Marxist' before the... name of their... political... label?
=o
Rollo
4th November 2006, 04:56
Leninists such as myself believe that the proleteriat can only achieve successful revolutionary consciouscness through a communist party of full time revolutionaries. So it is different from mainstream marxism.
EDIT:
Marxism Leninism is so named because Leninism is based upon Marxism ( communism ) so it uses marxism as a sort of building block.
Module
4th November 2006, 05:53
So... what are the differences between leninism and marxist-leninism? Any?
Rollo
4th November 2006, 06:03
Originally posted by
[email protected] 04, 2006 03:53 pm
So... what are the differences between leninism and marxist-leninism? Any?
Nothing. It's just a shorter way to say marxist leninist.
BreadBros
4th November 2006, 17:22
Originally posted by
[email protected] 04, 2006 05:53 am
So... what are the differences between leninism and marxist-leninism? Any?
Rollo is right. Although I will point out one difference: Trotskyists consider themselves Leninists too but do not use the M-L label. Usually when a group uses the M-L label on their name it means they reject both Trotskyism and "revisionism" (post-Stalin USSR policies) and are more orthodox in their adherence to Lenin, Stalin and the Bolsheviks. Likewise if you see a group with the label M-L-M or MLM it means Marxist-Leninist-Maoist meaning they adhere to the same principles as M-L but consider Mao Zedong to be a continuation of those theories. Trotskyists often refer to M-Lists as Stalinists, because they reject Stalin and what they consider to be his beauracratic "deformations" of the CCCP while the M-Lists see him in a more positive light. Of course, Stalinist is also a pejorative term on the left nowadays, so that may not be a fair label. Up to you to decide for yourself.
AlwaysAnarchy
4th November 2006, 22:35
I Have a very negative opinoin and experience with Marxists Leninists, Stalinists and their cultish "Great Leader" fetishes.....
Comrade Kurtz
4th November 2006, 22:37
They're Stalinists. Nuff said.
Aurora
5th November 2006, 00:54
You have pro-stalin "m-l's" and anti-stalin m-l's.
BreadBros
5th November 2006, 01:26
Originally posted by
[email protected] 05, 2006 12:54 am
You have pro-stalin "m-l's" and anti-stalin m-l's.
Anti-Stalin M-L's? Care to give an example? Usually those people are referred to as Trotskyists and they don't use the title "Marxist-Leninist" in their group names.
Aurora
5th November 2006, 01:32
Originally posted by
[email protected] 05, 2006 01:26 am
Anti-Stalin M-L's? Care to give an example? Usually those people are referred to as Trotskyists and they don't use the title "Marxist-Leninist" in their group names.
Ya,usualy but i have met some people that called themselves m-l but didnt support stalin in the least.You'd think they would call themselves trots but.... :rolleyes:
But ya your right,ive never seen a group like that
chebol
5th November 2006, 05:18
The DSP (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/29) in Australia is both marxist, and leninist, not stalinist yet not trotskyist (we used to be, about 20 years ago, but broke with a number of key points of orthodox trotskyism, including the Permanent Revolution (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/11) theory, as well as issues over our support for Cuba and Nicaragua). We do, however, agree with Trotsky's analysis of the bureaucratic degeneration of the USSR (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/123).
So, we are "trots" (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/114) to stalinists; "stalinists" to the trotskyists (and to the cliffites, who I wouldn't do lev the dishonour of including in his brood); "castroists" (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/110) to the anti-cubanists; third-worldists to the first-world chauvinists, "national chauvinists" because we are internationalist but not in an international (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/115); "red fascists" to the sectarian anarchists; etc (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=documents_debates).
At least noone calls us maoists (http://www.dsp.org.au/site/?q=node/119). :P (That I know of ...)
We just stick with the term "leninist", although if pressed it ought to be explained as "marxist-leninist". We don't often use that term because of the connotations with stalinism, just as we don'tuse the term "trotskyist" because of much of the baggage that carries - and it's not really correct.
We don't claim to be perfect - but we try.
Rollo
5th November 2006, 05:28
Originally posted by BreadBros+November 05, 2006 11:26 am--> (BreadBros @ November 05, 2006 11:26 am)
[email protected] 05, 2006 12:54 am
You have pro-stalin "m-l's" and anti-stalin m-l's.
Anti-Stalin M-L's? Care to give an example? Usually those people are referred to as Trotskyists and they don't use the title "Marxist-Leninist" in their group names. [/b]
Me. If you look at Lenin's works you will see they differ from the USSR.
BreadBros
5th November 2006, 07:42
Originally posted by Rollo+November 05, 2006 05:28 am--> (Rollo @ November 05, 2006 05:28 am)
Originally posted by
[email protected] 05, 2006 11:26 am
[email protected] 05, 2006 12:54 am
You have pro-stalin "m-l's" and anti-stalin m-l's.
Anti-Stalin M-L's? Care to give an example? Usually those people are referred to as Trotskyists and they don't use the title "Marxist-Leninist" in their group names.
Me. If you look at Lenin's works you will see they differ from the USSR. [/b]
I'm not saying their arent Leninists who are anti-USSR or anti-Stalin, what I was saying is that if a group includes the label "Marxist-Leninist" in their name in that hyphenated form it is usually used as a codeword for accepting Stalin's contributions to the USSR. Example: Communist Party of Canda (Marxist-Leninist).
Rollo
5th November 2006, 07:51
Originally posted by BreadBros+November 05, 2006 05:42 pm--> (BreadBros @ November 05, 2006 05:42 pm)
Originally posted by
[email protected] 05, 2006 05:28 am
Originally posted by
[email protected] 05, 2006 11:26 am
[email protected] 05, 2006 12:54 am
You have pro-stalin "m-l's" and anti-stalin m-l's.
Anti-Stalin M-L's? Care to give an example? Usually those people are referred to as Trotskyists and they don't use the title "Marxist-Leninist" in their group names.
Me. If you look at Lenin's works you will see they differ from the USSR.
I'm not saying their arent Leninists who are anti-USSR or anti-Stalin, what I was saying is that if a group includes the label "Marxist-Leninist" in their name in that hyphenated form it is usually used as a codeword for accepting Stalin's contributions to the USSR. Example: Communist Party of Canda (Marxist-Leninist). [/b]
The CPA ( Marxist - Leninist ) Are actually stalinist and maoist. So I get what you mean.
Rodack
5th November 2006, 17:40
Originally posted by Comrade
[email protected] 04, 2006 10:37 pm
They're Stalinists. Nuff said.
Hillary Clinton calls herself a devout Stalinist
BreadBros
5th November 2006, 19:16
Originally posted by Rodack+November 05, 2006 05:40 pm--> (Rodack @ November 05, 2006 05:40 pm)
Comrade
[email protected] 04, 2006 10:37 pm
They're Stalinists. Nuff said.
Hillary Clinton calls herself a devout Stalinist [/b]
Source?
People can call themselves whatever random shit they want, its really actions that determine what you are. So far Hillary Clinton has shown that she is nothing more than a liberal.
Severian
18th June 2007, 09:20
"Marxist-Leninist" is a term coined to describe the official ideology of the USSR after Lenin's death.....
It's used today by various groups which used to look to the Kremlin, or the Chinese regime, or some other apparatchik regime, for guidance.
They call themselves "Marxist-Leninist" - some other people would call them Stalinist (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=41124)
Janus
18th June 2007, 21:17
Please use the search function in the future.
Previous threads:
Leninism (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=65556&hl=Leninism)
Marxism and Leninism (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=62034&hl=Leninism)
Leninism (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=60831&hl=Leninism)
Marxism, Leninism (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=56406&hl=Leninism)
Marxism, Leninism, etc. (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=49775&hl=Leninism)
Marxism vs. Leninism (http://www.revleft.com/index.php?showtopic=47662&hl=Leninism)
Die Neue Zeit
19th June 2007, 01:50
Here's to a resident "Leninist" Marxist who does NOT like to use the awkward term combination known as "Marxism-Leninism" or "Bolshevism-Leninism." :)
Simply put there are few REAL "Leninists" out there, and those REAL "Leninists" prefer the term "revolutionary Marxism." :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.