Log in

View Full Version : "Alaskan villages reject free Venezuelan Oil"



Lenin's Law
11th October 2006, 17:48
I guess this proves what massive corporate propaganda can do to some people - loyalty to some war-criminal like Bush trumps their own safety and security.


http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/09102006/2/worl...zuelan-oil.html (http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/09102006/2/world-poor-patriotic-quot-alaskan-natives-refuse-free-venezuelan-oil.html)

Poor but 'patriotic" Alaskan natives refuse free Venezuelan oil
Mon Oct 9, 7:22 PM


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) - In Alaska's native villages, the punishing winter cold is already coming through the walls of the lightly insulated plywood homes, many of the villagers are desperately poor and heating-oil prices are among the highest in the United States.


And yet, a few villages are refusing free heating oil from Venezuela, on the patriotic principle that no foreigner has the right to call their president "the devil."


The heating oil is being offered by the petroleum company controlled by Venezuelan government. While scores of Alaska's native villages said they have no choice but to accept, others would rather suffer.


"As a citizen of this country, you can have your own opinion of our president and our country. But I don't want a foreigner coming in here and bashing us," said Justine Gunderson, administrator for the tribal council in the Aleut village Nelson Lagoon.


"Even though we're in economically dire straits, it was the right choice to make."


Nelson Lagoon residents pay more than US$1.30 a litre for oil - or at least $300 a month a household - to heat their homes along the wind-swept coast of the Bering Sea, where temperatures can dip to -9 C. About one-quarter of the 70 villagers are looking for work, in part because Alaska's salmon fishing industry has been hit hard by competition from fish farms.


The donation to Alaska's native villages has focused attention on rampant poverty and high fuel prices in a state that is otherwise awash in oil - and oil profits. In 2005, 86 per cent of Alaska's general fund, or $2.8 billion, came from oil from the North Slope.


The Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, a native non-profit organization that would have handled the heating oil donation on behalf of 291 households in Nelson Lagoon, Atka, St. Paul and St. George, rejected the offer because of insults Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has hurled at Bush.


Chavez called Bush "the devil" in a speech to the United Nations last month. He has also called the president a terrorist and denounced the war in Iraq.


Dimitri Philemonof, president and chief executive of the association, said accepting the aid would be "compromising ourselves."


"I think we have some duty to our country and I think it's loyalty," he said.


Over the last two years, Citgo, the Venezuelan government's Texas-based oil subsidiary, has given millions of litres of discounted heating oil to the poor in several U.S. states and cities - including New York, Connecticut, Vermont, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Maine.


Maine Gov. John Baldacci, who approved an agreement last winter to buy discounted oil, said he has no plans this year to seek a similar arrangement. In Boston, a city council member wants a landmark Citgo sign near Fenway Park taken down and replaced with a U.S. flag. In Florida, a legislator asked the state to cancel Citgo's exclusive contract to sell fuel at turnpike service stations.


About 150 native villages in Alaska have accepted money for heating oil from Citgo. The oil company does not operate in Alaska, so instead of sending oil, it is donating about $5.3 million to native non-profit organizations to buy 380 litres this winter for each of more than 12,000 households.


"When you have a dire need and it is a matter of survival for your people, it doesn't matter where, what country, the gift or donation comes from," said Virginia Commack, an elder in the arctic village Ambler, an impoverished community of 280 where residents are paying more than $1.90 a litre for fuel.


For years, Alaska natives have accused the state and U.S. governments of sending too little money to their tiny, far-flung communities, where fuel and grocery prices are bloated by the high costs of delivery by plane and barge.


An editorial last month in the Anchorage Daily News newspaper bashed the Alaska state legislature's rejection in March of an $8.8-million state supplement to a U.S. government program that helps poor Alaskans with home heating costs.


"It's embarrassing that residents in a state with so much oil wealth should be looking to a foreign nation for help," the newspaper said.

"It's hard to blame villagers for accepting the gift."

A spokesman for Alaska Gov. Frank Murkowski, John Manly, said the governor believes Chavez's donation is a ploy to undermine Americans' faith in their government. But he said it is up to each village to make its own decision.

"It seems like a very strange irony that we produce the oil and yet every year there seems to be a chronic problem in getting the fuel to people that need it," Manly said.

Joan Eddy, principal and teacher at Nelson Lagoon's school, said most buildings in town were erected 30 to 40 years ago, which makes them pretty old, considering how they are battered by the constant 40-kilometre-an-Hour wind coming off the ocean. Their heating systems are aging, too.

She noted the fuel barge is late arriving this year and said residents are turning on their furnaces for only a few hours in the morning and at night.

"We're conserving as much as we can because we are concerned. It looks like it's going to be a snowy winter and cold," she said.

Lenin's Law
11th October 2006, 17:54
One thing I noticed is that the article does not specifically mention how many villages actually rejected the aid; it does mention that over 150 villages have accepted it and in here it says that only "a few" villages were refusing the free heating oil.

"And yet, a few villages are refusing free heating oil from Venezuela, on the patriotic principle that no foreigner has the right to call their president "the devil." "


It could be and in fact most probably is that the villages rejecting the aid out of some bogus and idiotic "patriotic" princple are only a small minority while the overwhelming majority accept the aid (despite the entire political/media establishment attacking Chavez) but that is not the story mentioned here.

bcbm
11th October 2006, 18:06
"It seems like a very strange irony that we produce the oil and yet every year there seems to be a chronic problem in getting the fuel to people that need it," Manly said.

Its like he's almost got it, but can't quite make the jump.

Comrade J
11th October 2006, 18:13
So it's ok for them to criticise Saddam Hussein, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong Il etc... but as soon as someone criticises their president, it suddenly becomes such a crime.

Fuck the Bush supporters, let them freeze.

Nothing Human Is Alien
11th October 2006, 18:13
Only a hand full of villages have rejected the donations, and it was mostly petty bourgeois leaders who made that decision, not the every day worker freezing to death.


But I don't want a foreigner coming in here and bashing us,

1. He didn' t bash "us," he bashed the President.
2. He didn't come "here," the UN is international territory.
3. The U.S. does alot more than "bash" other world leaders. See, Operation Mongoose.

Guerrilla22
11th October 2006, 19:17
Even with immense amounts of oil in their state, Alaskans are still freezing during the winter. Welocme to capitalism.

Janus
12th October 2006, 03:55
Even with immense amounts of oil in their state
The amount of oil there isn't exactly immense. I think studies showed that the oil from the Arctic refuge would only satisfy the US's oil demand for 6 months which was why many opposed the drilling operations.


Alaskans are still freezing during the winter
I'm guessing these are more or less Native American Inuits? They have always been marginalized by the gov.

Nothing Human Is Alien
12th October 2006, 05:48
I think studies showed that the oil from the Arctic refuge would only satisfy the US's oil demand for 6 months..

But it would satisfy Alaska's for much longer.. which was the point.


I'm guessing these are more or less Native American Inuits? They have always been marginalized by the gov.

Yes they are, and yes you're right.

Lenin's Law
12th October 2006, 11:47
Originally posted by Comrade [email protected] 11 2006, 03:14 PM
So it's ok for them to criticise Saddam Hussein, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong Il etc... but as soon as someone criticises their president, it suddenly becomes such a crime.

Good point. The US media can attack and demonize leaders and countries it doesn't like all it wants, such as the cases you've just mentioned, but when someone else , particularly a person of color , comes in and attacks "our" president then it becomes a matter of ridiculous patriotism and the reactionaries become oh so self-righteous.

I think Companero de Libertad is right though, only a small numbers of villages actually rejected the aid and this was not done by a democratic process but by a few "leaders" who made the decision for them.

Dr. Rosenpenis
13th October 2006, 00:01
The US doesn't just slander foreign leaders, they also kill them.

The US will be better off after these idiots freeze to death.

Sadena Meti
13th October 2006, 00:06
Originally posted by Dr. [email protected] 12 2006, 04:02 PM
The US will be better off after these idiots freeze to death.
Darwinism in action.