Log in

View Full Version : DPRK to conduct "another nuclear test"



Kurt Crover
3rd October 2006, 21:09
Pyongyang, DPRK - North Korea is to conduct a nuclear test "in the future", the foreign ministry said in a statement.
The move would "bolster" the country's self-defence in the face of US military hostility, official agency KCNA said.

Pyongyang has faced mounting international pressure over its nuclear programme, and in July was condemned by the UN for test-launching missiles.

The news has been condemned by the US, Japan, South Korea and Russia - all members of the six-nation talks.

The US state department said any nuclear test would further isolate the North Korean regime and said the US would work with allies to discourage "such a reckless action".

North Korea gave no time-frame for a test, but correspondents say a successful nuclear trial would signal the end of international negotiations on the North's nuclear ambitions, and threaten a dangerous arms race in East Asia.

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said the nuclear test plans were unacceptable and would be responded to "harshly".

South Korea's government went into emergency security talks, while Yang Chang-Seok, a spokesman for the country's unification ministry, warned that any test would have "a decisively negative impact on inter-Korean relations".

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called for restraint, and a diplomatic solution, while UK foreign office officials warned of "serious consequences" to what would be regarded as "a highly provocative act".

North Korea is thought to have developed a handful of warheads but has never before announced it would test one.

The announcement comes as six-nation talks on its nuclear programme have been stalled for a year.

The North has also appeared increasingly angry at sanctions imposed by the US and other countries on North Korean businesses accused of arms sales and illegal activities.

The statement from Pyongyang said it would "in the future conduct a nuclear test under the condition where safety is firmly guaranteed", though it did not state when.


"The US daily increasing threat of a nuclear war and its vicious sanctions and pressure have caused a grave situation on the Korean Peninsula," it said.

The ministry went on to say that "under the present situation in which the US moves to isolate and stifle" North Korea, the country "can no longer remain an onlooker to the developments".

The move comes after the UN imposed sanctions on North Korea in July, for test-firing seven missiles including a long-range Taepodong-2 - believed to be capable of reaching Alaska.

The missile tests also prompted South Korea to suspend aid to the North, and correspondents say China had been showing signs of frustration with its old Communist ally.


North Korea claims to have nuclear weapons and to be working on building up its arsenal.

In 2002 it restarted its nuclear reactor at Yongbyon and forced two UN nuclear monitors to leave the country.

It is unclear how far work has progressed at the plant since then.

Washington is not only concerned about the development of such weapons in North Korea, but also wants to curb Pyongyang's capacity to export missile and nuclear technology to other states or organisations.


Oh shit. The US ain't gonna like this :blink:

TC
3rd October 2006, 21:37
Oh shit. The US ain't gonna like this

Yah and what are they gonna do about it lol attack a nation with real "WMD"?

Kurt Crover
3rd October 2006, 21:42
I saw this on a MySpace page and I'll repeat it here:

"DO NOT FUCK WITH THE JONG!" :D

bloody_capitalist_sham
4th October 2006, 01:09
To be secure that north america wont invade the DPRK, dont the DPRK only need a few nukes that can reach South Korean cities?

Surely they could never invade the DPRK then??

Dreckt
4th October 2006, 04:00
Well, this will surely get North Korea some fighting ground, but it really won't accomplish anything. As long as they don't use them, there won't be any "problems" so to say...

Nothing Human Is Alien
4th October 2006, 05:09
http://images.cafepress.com/product/69829171v3_240x240_Front.jpg

bcbm
4th October 2006, 07:16
Originally posted by Compań[email protected] 3 2006, 08:10 PM
http://images.cafepress.com/product/69829171v3_240x240_Front.jpg
Holy crap, I want that shirt.

Kurt Crover
4th October 2006, 12:54
Originally posted by [email protected] 4 2006, 01:01 AM
Well, this will surely get North Korea some fighting ground, but it really won't accomplish anything. As long as they don't use them, there won't be any "problems" so to say...
I thought that, at least the US will be brought to the negotiating table.

TC
4th October 2006, 16:31
Originally posted by Compań[email protected] 4 2006, 02:10 AM
http://images.cafepress.com/product/69829171v3_240x240_Front.jpg
I need that shirt! where did you find it?????

Nothing Human Is Alien
4th October 2006, 17:09
You should have read my earlier thread!

http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=56833

red team
4th October 2006, 17:49
Originally posted by Compań[email protected] 4 2006, 02:10 AM
http://images.cafepress.com/product/69829171v3_240x240_Front.jpg
...And the constitution of the DPRK says that if you say anything critical about "Dear Leader" then the police can break down your door and drag you off to be re-educated right?

You know better than that. Dear leader is an infallible super-genius.

Kurt Crover
4th October 2006, 21:02
Originally posted by red team+Oct 4 2006, 02:50 PM--> (red team @ Oct 4 2006, 02:50 PM)
Compań[email protected] 4 2006, 02:10 AM
http://images.cafepress.com/product/69829171v3_240x240_Front.jpg
...And the constitution of the DPRK says that if you say anything critical about "Dear Leader" then the police can break down your door and drag you off to be re-educated right?

You know better than that. Dear leader is an infallible super-genius. [/b]
Finally somebody with some sense :lol:

Guerrilla22
4th October 2006, 21:39
Another nuclear test? When did the first one take place? Sure I'd love it if the DPRK tested a nuke out in the open where the world could see, however I doubt they actually have a nuke, sounds like more useless rhetoric from Dear Leder to me.

Red Heretic
4th October 2006, 22:01
Let's let Bush spy on us so they can't test nuclear weapons.

JazzRemington
4th October 2006, 22:08
I read that S. Korea and China are disputing N. Korea's claim.

Whitten
4th October 2006, 22:42
Its not "another" they have never tested a nuke before.

Goatse
5th October 2006, 00:33
Who cares if Kim has a nuke? The US has about 10,000, and they've been known in the past to use them.

Guerrilla22
5th October 2006, 03:09
Like I said, before it would be off the hizie if the DPRK did in fact have a nuke. Unfortunately its doubtful.

chimx
5th October 2006, 03:43
i went to a panel discussion a year ago on the nuke issue and all the experts discussed that there were 3-4 confirmed nuclear weapons in the dprk.

Guerrilla22
5th October 2006, 03:59
Originally posted by [email protected] 5 2006, 12:44 AM
i went to a panel discussion a year ago on the nuke issue and all the experts discussed that there were 3-4 confirmed nuclear weapons in the dprk.
What experts? experts in the US also claimed that Saddam had ongoing chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs if I remeber correctly. I'll believe Kim Jong Il has a nuke when I see it.

Tekun
5th October 2006, 04:42
Originally posted by Compań[email protected] 4 2006, 02:10 AM
http://images.cafepress.com/product/69829171v3_240x240_Front.jpg
Damn, that's one crazy shirt
If I were caught wearing it, I'd be the talk of the town :lol:


Regarding the DPRK, they're pushing their weight around, seeing if the US will call in their lackies (UN)
They're bluffing, and I think the US is gonna take the bait

Janus
5th October 2006, 07:10
The US ain't gonna like this
Nor South Korea or Japan.

Here's the summarized North Korean statement concerning the test.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/5402292.stm

bcbm
5th October 2006, 07:59
My man Kim Jong ILL knows how to bring the PAIN, ya'll best recognize.

Kurt Crover
5th October 2006, 15:27
Originally posted by black banner black [email protected] 5 2006, 05:00 AM
My man Kim Jong ILL knows how to bring the PAIN, ya'll best recognize.
sounds like something an American wrestler would say.

CheRev
5th October 2006, 16:02
Well here´s the US governments view on things:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/5408246.stm

It sounds like they´re threatening to blow them out of the water if they get a nuclear weapon... maybe even a preemptive attack.

Whitten
5th October 2006, 16:16
The US cant go nuclear on the DPRK, that would have most of their allies reject them. If they go for conventional warfare then the DPRK can launch its nukes at the south, or maybe Japan. They're already under sanctions, I cant see they have much to lose.

bloody_capitalist_sham
5th October 2006, 17:35
USA on DPRK Nukes (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/5408246.stm)

Uh ho

I really hope all hell doesnt break loose. Or i imagine lots of north koreans civilians will be bombed to shit by american planes.

bcbm
6th October 2006, 07:24
If the US moves against North Korea, much of South Korea would be leveled by artillery fire pretty quickly. I think the US isn't in much of a position to do more than talk shit though, given the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Kurt Crover
6th October 2006, 12:07
in that BBC report, does it look like one of the nukes is picking Kim Jong Il's nose? http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42165000/jpg/_42165198_seoulrally_ap203b.jpg


But seriously...

If there's a new Korean War, It's pretty obvious the DPRK could take the ROK pretty easily, but the problem is that Bush will send his soldiers once again miles and miles away from home, and it'll be the same as it was in the 50s. But if the DPRK uses nuclear weapons, that's a dangerous new territory that we don't know anything about: nuclear war.

Personally I think Kim Jong Il probably would nuke South Korea in the war wasn't going the DPRK's way, but the US would totally level the DPRK if it did. Pyongyang would be levelled and Washington would declare a "victory" whatever the casualties and fatalities.

Anyway I must go, Oasis "Some Might Say" is on the TV and I wanna dance :lol:

Pink Moon
6th October 2006, 19:55
Originally posted by Guerrilla22+Oct 5 2006, 01:00 AM--> (Guerrilla22 @ Oct 5 2006, 01:00 AM)
[email protected] 5 2006, 12:44 AM
i went to a panel discussion a year ago on the nuke issue and all the experts discussed that there were 3-4 confirmed nuclear weapons in the dprk.
What experts? experts in the US also claimed that Saddam had ongoing chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs if I remeber correctly. I'll believe Kim Jong Il has a nuke when I see it. [/b]
Careful on what you wish for.

Kurt Crover
7th October 2006, 15:12
If the DPRK does possess nuclear weapons, It's unlikely they'll reach the US, right? Because didn't the previous weapons crash into the Sea Of Japan?

Tatarin
9th October 2006, 03:46
If the DPRK does possess nuclear weapons, It's unlikely they'll reach the US, right? Because didn't the previous weapons crash into the Sea Of Japan?

You don't build nuclear weapons to use them, specially not against the US, because that would be suicide. You make them because it will stop foreign troops to occupy your nation. Kim Jong Il is not that desperate... yet.

Guerrilla22
9th October 2006, 19:23
Originally posted by Kurt [email protected] 7 2006, 12:13 PM
If the DPRK does possess nuclear weapons, It's unlikely they'll reach the US, right? Because didn't the previous weapons crash into the Sea Of Japan?
Of course not, last time I checked the US ahd a few nukes themselves. 12,000 thousand of them and the uS obviously has the capacity to hit the DPRK with a ballistic missile.