Log in

View Full Version : Nazis and Women



kaaos_af
26th September 2006, 17:02
Here is a discussion from VNN that clears up our questions about how women will be treated in the Fourth Reich- "Why aren't there more women in the Cause?"

Ha- I wonder.
Here are their answers-

"Women's constant need for social approval in fact makes them inferior to men so you can't complain about White Nationalist males speaking the truth. The Jews have used women's need for social approval against us."
-Desert Fox

You say it brother, Heil Hitler! :D

"It is clear we need some affirmative action, then! Lets knit our problems away!"
-Bolg

"Why would women become involved? Most of the men see women as inferior, only good for having babies, cooking them and their "comrades" meals and generally being a 21st Century slave. The entire right-wing is anti-woman apart from in the most patronising and negative terms and I've seen it so many times."
-MW88
"The reason is because the cause isn't cool. If it was trendy, like coffee, women would be waving the nazi flag stronger than us. HG says it's because it is hostile to women. Well niggers are too, but it seems a lot of women can't get enough of shoving out half breed monstrosities, but niggers are cool you see. Cool and dangerous, because that's what MTV says."
-Cowboy Zeke

"Jewish "feminism" and "careerism" has infected the minds of so many of our women. Are we to believe that a "career in modeling" is a more worthy endeavour than giving birth to a white child? Who does it benefit to have our women embrace this kind of value system?"
-Semitically Incorrect

"Any woman that is married a white man and has two and more children is your supporter. The same with the young girls who plan to do the same."
-Ural

" men are the hunters. men are the gatherers. men are the fighters. men are the killers. men are the destroyers. men are the builders. all the great geniuses have been men. and will continue to be. that's why the GOD DAMNED JEWS, HOMOS, AND FEMINISTS want a levelled-out society!
women are the care-takers. women want security. women birth our children. women suckle their young. women do a larger part than men in raising the young."
-Silverstein

"Spoken like a true feminist!
This is the kind of patent nonsense one would expect to read on the New Labour web site or any other sell-out race-traitor populist party!
Will you be campaigning for `quotas` or `affirmative action/positive discrimination` also?
Women have their place-behind the kitchen sink,cooking my food and producing my babies!
I don`t want them in politics or any other role that they are genetically unfitted for!
Will you also be demanding that we have more `ethnic minorities` within our movement-I know some former WN parties that have already started on that road!
Homosexuals anyone?"
-Aryan Lord

I hope Prussian Blue is reading this!!!

"It is because of the universal franchise and women having the vote that we are in this bloody mess!
Let them produce Aryan babies and not meddle in issues that are not their concern.
We are racialists-not equal opportunity advocates!
-Aryan Lord

"Women are not psychologically suited to engage in the cut and thrust of politics and when they do attempt this they are taking on a role that is properly within the responsibility of men.They psychologically become male.I can think of nothing more unappealing.
The Third Reich was devoid of such creatures.We permit gender and racial confusion at our peril.
One look at the way you behaved on the Phora,salivating over a dirty jew is evidence that women are too fickle to engage in politics."
-(ibid.)

" i have never "salivated" over oriental women. i am not attracted to them. their bodies are not shapely and curved enough. i don't like their facial features either. why would white men "salivate" over them? they can't hold a candle to even an average looking white woman.

of course, compared with female nigger-beasts, i guess an oriental chick wouldn't look TOO bad. thankfully, there are more than enough white women around to lust after... (now if only at least a few of them would change their attitudes...)"
-Silverstein

"Women are contemptible creatures, absolutely incapable of honorable acts. At their best, they breed conformity. In their normal worst, they are agents of vice. The Jew knows that, therefore he uses them for trading sex with semitically-correct attitudes. Like rats, our males have been lured into abject submission through conditioned response. Say some good things about niggs and women will react positively. Say some bad things about niggs and women will want having nothing to do with you.

It is much more than a problem of intelligence. Intelligence tests have proven the biological difference is trivial. Why then are women so ostensibly stupid? For the very reasons listed above: conformity and lack of any feeling of inquiry. Women simply DON'T CARE what happens outside their petty relativistic world. Couple these problems with an enormous voracity for vicious acts (dishonesty, treachery, cowardice, perversion) and you get the formula for something that demands newer terms to qualify the level of moral abyss they live into.

The moment women enter a movement, discipline leaves. I think we need a movement that simply doesn't admin women among its members. Even the 10% (baseless, after all, since no statistical observations on "racists" have so far been done) is far too much for what should have been a pristine 100% Aryan male movement. Aryans love purity, Jews love diversity. MAKE YOUR CHOICE."
-Aherne

"Males build the nest, males defend the nest, females soften the nest, females fill the nest with young. End of story."
-Hitler Goddess

By the way, Hitler Goddess, who made the above comment, was understandably repulsed by some of the comments her 'comrades' made and objected to their sexism. And was banned. She said on the Phora:

"It finally happened. And it appears to be a permanent ban. the last thing I was talking about was simply women in "the cause" and "misogyny" hindering this."

Anyway- back to the discussion at hand.

""White women are the prize who will go to the victors.

This war, if it is ever fought, will have to be fought by White men essentially without the moral support and respect and love of their women (or many of their women). This is the society the jew has created. It greatly increases the difficulty for our men warriors because they have to very often go it alone. This is one of the factors limiting the number of White men willing and able to see through the jew anti-white propagandasphere, the number of White men willing to fight for their race -- or even to see it. Few White men are willing to pay that necessary price. Defense of their women and children and their White Civilization requires going against the will of their own women.

First the war -- by awakened White men alone.

Then we'll have our women (if we win).

Our women will WANT to go to whoever wins. That is the nature of women. They seek and yearn for whoever is dominant in their society. Race is irrelevant to them. This is why women must never be leaders and why their influence before and during the war for White independence should be shunned, not sought. If they're willing to marry you and have your children, fine. Beyond that their role is necessarily limited -- for the present.

If we lose, the jews, niggers, spics, and asians will have our women (and our children) -- and that will end the genetics of the White race. (And the White feminists will have gotten what they so long have sought -- the defeat and eradication of their White men and brutal domination and enslavement of themselves and their children by non-white men. This will be a fitting and even desirable end for White feminists. Unfortunately, that fitting end will require the end of everything White forever. And so we must not let them have their natural consequence.)
-Devere

"The intelligence difference between men and women is close to 5 IQ points. This is significant. It is the difference between seeing through the propagandasphere and not seeing through it for the average woman. This difference becomes magnified immensely on the extreme ends of the bell curve. This is why there have been almost no great productive women geniuses throughout White history (the only history that matters). This is important because productive genius leads forward society. Discrimination against White men by jews and their feminists, lops off the great productive potential of the White Race -- and mediocritizes White society. All the better for jews to dominate and destroy."
-ibid.

"Without all the marxist feminist agit-prop relentlessly pumped out by the ZOG's media, the majority of White women would be content to fullfill their natural roles as wives and mothers and home-makers."
-hengest

" oh, and i won't miss the feminist jew-apologist so-called Hitler Goddess. i hope she gets her act together, and is not yet too old to bear children."
-Silverstein

"I think the reason there are not more women in the movement is because women are basically followers. I think women follow the lead of men. Many white men today worship blacks. They watch football, basketball, and basically look at those niggers as gods. White women see their men worshipping blacks and so they do the same. On the flip side most women who are in white nationalism are in it because their men got them into it. (It is definitely like that for me and all of my friends.) I was never a wiggerette or anything but I had no real race consciouness until the man in my life showed me the right way to live. If there were a lot of assertive white men out there showing women the way they would follow."
-EvaBraun (a woman!)

" Here is an Aryan mentality: I say what I think and use the proper words for the proper situations. Why prostituting our language, when there are exact words for the way women behave: BRAINLESS VILE WHORES.

I don't care how an intelligent woman would react. If she's honorable, which is impossible, she would have to agree. With women, agreements and disagreements are always a matter of? person, never IDEAS."
-Aherne


So, all you women ready to take up arms now?

Rollo
26th September 2006, 17:09
So full of wisdom. Wonder what people like lillith from stormfront downunder would have to say about this.

kaaos_af
26th September 2006, 17:15
Yeah good point- HEY LILITH- or one of her fucked up mates from Stormfront! What do you have to say in defence of your white brethren?

Rollo
26th September 2006, 17:16
It's true, I'm only useful to make babies, cook and clean for my big tough aryan men.

Forward Union
26th September 2006, 17:21
"Without all the marxist feminist agit-prop relentlessly pumped out by the ZOG's media, the majority of White women would be content to fullfill their natural roles as wives and mothers and home-makers."
-hengest

Somebody tell all the women, quick! they're getting all worked up about nothing!

Anyway some of this rose-petals White-Nationalist brothers ought to tell her to put those fingers away and get back in the kitchen! Unless they havent noticed shes a she yet. They're all talk!
http://www.londonclasswar.org/images/scumbag.jpg

Rollo
26th September 2006, 17:25
As seen on FDB.

The Pieman wrote:

NZTrooper says:
are you shagging Mel yet
NZTrooper says:
ha ha
NZTrooper says:
sorry
Edward - Proud and Ready says:
Who is Mel?
NZTrooper says:
Melanie
Edward - Proud and Ready says:
But who is Melanie?
NZTrooper says:
is this Ed from Wellington?
Edward - Proud and Ready says:
No, this is Ed from Sydney.

kaaos_af
26th September 2006, 17:32
Well boys, that's the answer to your question- "Why aren't there more women in the Cause?"

An archist
26th September 2006, 17:51
it also shows nazis are really weird

kaaos_af
2nd October 2006, 16:07
Hmmm seems that VNN's rival boards are shutting up about this, even though it could get them some trump points against those race-traitors at VNN

Okocim
2nd October 2006, 17:49
fuck. I knew they were backwards, but that's really quite shocking. Still, good for us I suppose - they are alienating 50% of the "white race", that's 50% less people who would ever join them. :)

kaaos_af
3rd October 2006, 16:55
:D good point

RedAnarchist
6th October 2006, 19:12
So why do we not attract more females to our leftist movements? We need to show women that Communism will liberate them from patriarchy in the same way we will liberate the workers from capitalism.

BreadBros
7th October 2006, 02:03
There are a lot of women leftists for that explicit reason. The left may seem male-heavy because it is on this board, i dont know why but my guess would be for whatever reason women are a little less prone to being comp-geeky and posting a lot all day. If you go to a protest or check out most leftist groups though, they tend to be about equal between the genders. Unlike these Nazi brutes.

kaaos_af
7th October 2006, 05:48
Depends on where you are here in Queensland I'd say women make up the majority of the left.

Mujer Libre
7th October 2006, 07:43
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2006, 02:49 AM
Depends on where you are here in Queensland I'd say women make up the majority of the left.
Yeah, I've noticed similar things here, although that tends to be within autonomous, anarchist-type groups. Generally, the less autonomous and the more authoritarian the group, the fewer women...

But I've also noticed that men tend to speak up more, and then when we're doing a stall, people who approach almost always talk to the blokes, even when there are say, three women and one guy. :(

rioters bloc
7th October 2006, 07:50
Originally posted by Mujer Libre+Oct 7 2006, 02:44 PM--> (Mujer Libre @ Oct 7 2006, 02:44 PM)
[email protected] 7 2006, 02:49 AM
Depends on where you are here in Queensland I'd say women make up the majority of the left.
Yeah, I've noticed similar things here, although that tends to be within autonomous, anarchist-type groups. Generally, the less autonomous and the more authoritarian the group, the fewer women...

But I've also noticed that men tend to speak up more, and then when we're doing a stall, people who approach almost always talk to the blokes, even when there are say, three women and one guy. :( [/b]
very true.

i&#39;ve also noticed that even though there are more wom*n than men in the left at my uni, when it comes to making decisions the men tend to be more vocal (even to the point of dominating) but when it comes to actualy work being carried out they seem to disappear...<_<

i brought this up at work (since we work in a flat-structure, non-hierarchical collective way - in theory). it was extremely difficult but i managed to get it all out, and they acknowledged it and suggested ways that they would change their habits.

so far it&#39;s working but i&#39;ve already seen it starting to fall apart again...

Rollo
7th October 2006, 11:03
Originally posted by Mujer Libre+Oct 7 2006, 02:44 PM--> (Mujer Libre @ Oct 7 2006, 02:44 PM)
[email protected] 7 2006, 02:49 AM
Depends on where you are here in Queensland I&#39;d say women make up the majority of the left.
Yeah, I&#39;ve noticed similar things here, although that tends to be within autonomous, anarchist-type groups. Generally, the less autonomous and the more authoritarian the group, the fewer women...

But I&#39;ve also noticed that men tend to speak up more, and then when we&#39;re doing a stall, people who approach almost always talk to the blokes, even when there are say, three women and one guy. :( [/b]
Seriously? I always talk to the women first because I liek talking to women more than I do men.

Comeback Kid
7th October 2006, 14:52
Seriously? I always talk to the women first because I liek talking to women more than I do men.

Thats cuz most men in Queensland are like FOOOTY&#33; and BOYR

BreadBros
8th October 2006, 02:24
What is FOOOTY and BOYR?

kaaos_af
8th October 2006, 08:10
I think it&#39;s something to do with this whole &#39;sport&#39; concept.

Again, it really depends on where you are: The local Autho-Trot factions have about 50/50 men and women. One sect, Socialist Alternative, actually has more women than men. The local leaderships, however, do seem to be reasonably male dominated- but I&#39;m saying that as an outsider, so I may be wrong.

In the Anarchist movement, there aren&#39;t any real groups together right now that are actually operating, but in general I&#39;d say there&#39;s more women (A)&#39;s and that they tend to be more vocal than the blokes. The collective some freinds and I are getting on its feet is about 50/50, Brisbane Anarchists Smashing The Australian Representative Democracy (BASTARD) is mostly male and the Institute of Social Ecology is also led by blokes- so the organised anarchist movement is male-heavy, but I really don&#39;t see this as a problem. We&#39;re all (A)&#39;s right? Not like our groups are filled with sexist fuckwits. There is a group combatting rape in the community that&#39;s mostly women (A)&#39;s I think, but I haven&#39;t been attending their meetings unfortunately. There&#39;s a few hundreds (A)&#39;s locally, and I&#39;m hoping that once my group has some more victories, that many more will be inspired into linking up with us or starting their own collectives.

Rollo
8th October 2006, 08:49
Originally posted by Comeback [email protected] 7 2006, 09:53 PM

Seriously? I always talk to the women first because I liek talking to women more than I do men.

Thats cuz most men in Queensland are like FOOOTY&#33; and BOYR
I live in NSW. I hate beer. I prefer bourbon to be honest....