Severian
14th September 2006, 01:41
Originally posted by Black
[email protected] 13 2006, 09:13 AM
Mandela was 'influenced' by the ideas of many of his close-friends in the South African Communist Party, but at heart he was always a liberal - the conditions of apartheid South Africa forced him (and the ANC) to take bigger and bigger steps in order to stay relevant to the African population, kind of like militant liberalism?
I'd describe him as a revolutionary democrat. Unlike liberalism, which is a tendency of the big bourgeoisie, revolutionary democracy is a middle-class tendency. Liberalism in South Africa was represented by the Progressive Federal Party/Democratic Party.
In Mandela's early political life, he was actually hostile to the role of the SACP in the ANC. When he was head of the ANC Youth League, that is, he said the SACP and particularly its white members had too much influence.
Later he had a more cooperative relationship with them. But.....
Mandela, and those closest to him politically, were more revolutionary than the SACP. The SACP certainly was a major part of the ANC and the "democratic alliance"; but not the most advanced part.
For example, at a critical point during the negotiations with the apartheid regime, SACP leader Slovo wrote a piece advocating the ANC agree to a rotten compromise - including that it should be ready to accept "a 'sunset' clause in the new constitution which would provide for compulsory power-sharing for a fixed number of years...." that is, require the ANC to form a coalition government with the apartheid National Party, no matter what conditions the National Party put on this. source (http://www.liberation.org.za/collections/sacp/slovo/negotiations.php)
This was accepted by the ANC Negotiations Committee - reflecting the influence of the SACP and other reformist elements. But it was, fortunately, rejected by the ANC National Working Committee.
Successfully arguing for this rejection, ANC leader Pallo Jordan wrote of Slovo's proposal:
While we will not get at the [negotiating] table what we have not won on other fronts, we should be equally careful not to give away what we have won on those fronts at the negotiating table. I fear "Strategic Perspecitve" is a prescription to do that. This attempt to revise the ANC's strategic perspective forms a composite whole, linked by a radically misguided conception of what is possible in the present. It must resolve itself in a perspective that projects or accomodates the piecemeal eradication of the substantive elements of CST - a reformist perspective!
Unfortunately, it does not work! Look at the history of social democracy!
(CST = "colonialism of a special type", one way of referring to apartheid.)
(This document, and others rejecting Slovo's proposal, aren't available on the web. But it is printed in the Dec. 25, 1992 issue of the Militant among other places.)
So in conclusion: No, Mandela was and isn't a communist. But he, and other ANC leaders, acted in a more revolutionary way than the Moscow-following "Communists" of the SACP!