Tekun
13th September 2006, 22:39
Originally posted by
[email protected] 8 2006, 11:49 PM
Eisenhower may have been an "imperialist" but that does not mean he was opposed to civilian rule.
What exactly do u mean by "civilian rule?"
So in your opinion he was FOR democracy?
Is that why he helped overthrow and kill Patrice Lumumba?
Is that why he overthrew the democratically elected government of Jacobo Arbenz Guzman?
Or maybe you don't remember how Eisenhower helped overthrow Mohammed Mossadegh, and then imposed the Shah upon the ppl without an election
Whatever gave u the impression that this man supported democracy or "civilian rule?" :huh: