Noah
31st August 2006, 21:59
I was reading the book 'The Undercover Economist'...
It brought up the argument;
If you take alot of take of someone who is unwilling or doesn't see their tax really helping them they'll command alot for example;
I want you to give me better health service, better schooling, better police and emergency services and so on.
But if you don't take tax or take minimal tax then, you could say 'put your money where your mouth is and pay for everything you need then'.
This has also been used in debates against me as aswell, I do mention that this would be terrible for the people at the bottom who might not be able to afford much at all.
Also I read this on the forum;
And as it is workers labor power, their time that is given up in order to create the products, they should dictate what things are produced, not the consumer
In socialism, if the workers in a factory decided what to make then how do they know whether the rest of the people need them?
And also I think this is a question regarding Marxist economics...
My teacher said the problem with Marxism is that is says;
'If a worker creates something that is not in demand, marxist economics says he should get paid the same as someone who is producing something that is much more in demand and so it kills the economy because marxist economics puts no value in the item itself but the worker's time'
Now he didn't say it exactly like this but that's how I remember it, I can't rreally argue back, he's an ex-anarchist but now he's social democratic .... I'm guessing that he's talking about the transitional stage; socialism as communist society doesn't have money anyway.
Can anyone help me out? I'm trying to learn, it's taken me about a year now, I've not even grasped the basics have I? xD
It brought up the argument;
If you take alot of take of someone who is unwilling or doesn't see their tax really helping them they'll command alot for example;
I want you to give me better health service, better schooling, better police and emergency services and so on.
But if you don't take tax or take minimal tax then, you could say 'put your money where your mouth is and pay for everything you need then'.
This has also been used in debates against me as aswell, I do mention that this would be terrible for the people at the bottom who might not be able to afford much at all.
Also I read this on the forum;
And as it is workers labor power, their time that is given up in order to create the products, they should dictate what things are produced, not the consumer
In socialism, if the workers in a factory decided what to make then how do they know whether the rest of the people need them?
And also I think this is a question regarding Marxist economics...
My teacher said the problem with Marxism is that is says;
'If a worker creates something that is not in demand, marxist economics says he should get paid the same as someone who is producing something that is much more in demand and so it kills the economy because marxist economics puts no value in the item itself but the worker's time'
Now he didn't say it exactly like this but that's how I remember it, I can't rreally argue back, he's an ex-anarchist but now he's social democratic .... I'm guessing that he's talking about the transitional stage; socialism as communist society doesn't have money anyway.
Can anyone help me out? I'm trying to learn, it's taken me about a year now, I've not even grasped the basics have I? xD