Count Von Eurotrash.
18th August 2006, 14:16
Indeed, my manifold experience demonstrates the inate phsychology of women is fundumentally anti-feminist.
It is imporant to recognise that our phsychology evolved NOT in the context of the 20th century female liberation movement, but rather the paleolithic situation of our ancestors which is highly alien to today's consumer sentiment.
I found out recently that one of my close aquaintences has killed himself over a love which was not returned simply because he was treating his woman with TOO MUCH respect. BIG MISTAKE!
In short, although women appreciate gentleman-like behaviour from their friends and partners, in the subconscious female mind the preferable partner is NOT a nice guy. On the contrary, he is assertive and unyielding to his lady's desires whilst maintaining his confident cool. Although he must not be mean, it is acceptable, nay, preferable that he treat her as though he were superior. Why? Becuase this is a factor involved in our evolution in times where the nice guy was seen as nothing more than an unmanly weakling. I have been testing this constantly for years and it is undeniably true. If you give your girl presents, she will see you as a weakling as it implies masculine inferiority. If you do give her presents, it is demonstrating that you simply don't have the power to woo other women, and are not the dominant male. In fact, you will have infinitely lot more success with her if you don't even smile to her whilst flirting/teasing. Should we blame consumer capitalism for this development? No, I prefer to lay the blame on the feminists who have falsely brainwashed society into the idea of treating women as definitive equals rather than natural complements to masculinity.
And yet you women all know this don't you? You can't deny it for I know its true. So whence the feminism? Don't you see it's nullifying effect upon the masculinity you innately desire?
It is imporant to recognise that our phsychology evolved NOT in the context of the 20th century female liberation movement, but rather the paleolithic situation of our ancestors which is highly alien to today's consumer sentiment.
I found out recently that one of my close aquaintences has killed himself over a love which was not returned simply because he was treating his woman with TOO MUCH respect. BIG MISTAKE!
In short, although women appreciate gentleman-like behaviour from their friends and partners, in the subconscious female mind the preferable partner is NOT a nice guy. On the contrary, he is assertive and unyielding to his lady's desires whilst maintaining his confident cool. Although he must not be mean, it is acceptable, nay, preferable that he treat her as though he were superior. Why? Becuase this is a factor involved in our evolution in times where the nice guy was seen as nothing more than an unmanly weakling. I have been testing this constantly for years and it is undeniably true. If you give your girl presents, she will see you as a weakling as it implies masculine inferiority. If you do give her presents, it is demonstrating that you simply don't have the power to woo other women, and are not the dominant male. In fact, you will have infinitely lot more success with her if you don't even smile to her whilst flirting/teasing. Should we blame consumer capitalism for this development? No, I prefer to lay the blame on the feminists who have falsely brainwashed society into the idea of treating women as definitive equals rather than natural complements to masculinity.
And yet you women all know this don't you? You can't deny it for I know its true. So whence the feminism? Don't you see it's nullifying effect upon the masculinity you innately desire?