Log in

View Full Version : The "Farce" of July - or you could call it "the force of the



rebelafrika
4th July 2003, 19:42
"What To The Slave Is The 4th Of July?"
FREDERICK DOUGLASS SPEECH 1841




Independence Day Speech at Rochester, 1841

Frederick Douglass (A former slave himself, Frederick Douglass
became a leader in the 19th Century Abolitionist Movement)


Fellow citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here today? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us? and am I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, and to confess the benefits and express devout gratitude for the blessings resulting from your independence to us?

Would to God, both for your sakes and ours, that an affirmative answer could be truthfully returned to these questions! Then would my task be light, and my burden easy and delightful. For who is there so cold that a nation's sympathy could not warm him? Who so obdurate and dead to the claims of gratitude that would not thankfully acknowledge such priceless benefits? Who so stolid and selfish that would not give his voice to swell the hallelujahs of a nation's jubilee, when the chains of servitude had been torn from his limbs? I am not that man. In a case like that the dumb might eloquently speak and the "lame man leap as an hart."


But such is not the state of the case. I say it with a sad sense of the disparity between us. am not included within the pale of this glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The blessings in which you, this day, rejoice are not enjoyed in common. The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity, and independence bequeathed by your fathers is shared by you, not by me. The sunlight that brought light and healing to you has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony. Do you mean, citizens, to mock me by asking me to speak today? If so, there is a parallel to your conduct. And let me warn that it is dangerous to copy the example of nation whose crimes, towering up to heaven, were thrown down by the breath of the Almighty, burying that nation in irrevocable ruin! I can today take up the plaintive lament of a peeled and woe-smitten people.

"By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down. Yea! We wept when we remembered Zion. We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. For there, they that carried us away captive, required of us a song; and they who wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. How can we sing the Lord's song in a strange land? If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. If do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth."

Fellow citizens, above your national, tumultuous joy, I hear the mournful wail of millions! Whose chains, heavy and grievous yesterday, are, today, rendered more intolerable by the jubilee shouts that reach them. If I do forget, if I do not faithfully remember those bleeding children of sorry this day, "may my right hand cleave to the roof of my mouth"! To forget them, to pass lightly over their wrongs, and to chime in with the popular theme would be treason most scandalous and shocking, and would make me a reproach before God and the world. My subject, then, fellow citizens, is American slavery. I shall see this day and its popular characteristics from the slave's point of view. Standing there identified with the American bondman, making his wrongs mine. I do not hesitate to declare with all my soul that the character and conduct of this nation never looked blacker to me than on this Fourth of July! Whether we turn to the declarations of the past or to the professions of the present, the conduct of the nation seems equally hideous and revolting. America is false to the past, false to the present, and solemnly binds herself to be false to the future. Standing with God and the crushed and bleeding slave on this occasion, I will, in the name of humanity which is outraged, in the name of liberty which is fettered, in the name of the Constitution and the Bible which are disregarded and trampled upon, dare to call in question and to denounce, with all the emphasis I can command, everything that serves to perpetuate slavery-the great sin and shame of America! "I will not equivocate, I will not excuse"; I will use the severest language I can command; and yet not one word shall escape me that any man, whose judgment is not blinded by prejudice, shall not confess to be right and just....

For the present, it is enough to affirm the equal manhood of the Negro race. Is it not as astonishing that, while we are plowing, planting, and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses, constructing bridges, building ships, working in metals of brass, iron, copper, and secretaries, having among us lawyers doctors, ministers, poets, authors, editors, orators, and teachers; and that, while we are engaged in all manner of enterprises common to other men, digging gold in California, capturing the whale in the Pacific, feeding sheep and cattle on the hillside, living, moving, acting, thinking, planning, living in families as husbands, wives, and children, and above all, confessing and worshiping the Christian's God, and looking hopefully for life and immortality beyond the grave, we are called upon to prove that we are men!...



What, am I to argue that it is wrong to make men brutes, to rob them of their liberty, to work them without wages, to keep them ignorant of their relations to their fellow men, to beat them with sticks, to flay their flesh with the lash, to load their limbs with irons, to hunt them with dogs, to sell them at auction, to sunder their families, to knock out their teeth, to burn their flesh, to starve them into obedience and submission to their masters? Must I argue that a system thus marked with blood, and stained with pollution, is wrong? No! I will not. I have better employment for my time and strength than such arguments would imply....

What, to the American slave, is your Fourth of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciation of tyrants, brass-fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are, to Him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy-a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States at this very hour.

Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms- of the Old World, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.

Severian
5th July 2003, 05:15
Good speech. Douglass was a great revolutionary. And yes, the Fourth of July is still a giant hypocrisy-fest.

'Course, I think we should also keep in mind another side of it. I'm going to spend a little time on it 'cause it's the aspect that present-day revolutionaries sometimes mess up on IMO. It's correct to bring out the limits of the American revolution, that its leaders were slaveowners and capitalists. To combat the mystified and santized version of its history.

But one shouldn't throw out the baby with the bathwater, and forget that the progressive side of the American War of Independence is part of the revolutionary heritage of humanity.

The First American Revolution/War of Independence was, despite all its warts, a progressive act.

For example: even though many of its leaders were slaveowners, it began the work of undermining slavery, and laying the groundwork for the Second American Revolution that abolished slavery.

By saying "all men are created equal", it provided ammunition to those who wanted to practice "all men are created equal. Within a few years after independence, some states had outlawed slavery; in contrast, it wasn't even an issue before the revolution.

Douglass speaks "in the name of the the Constitution and the Bible which are disregarded and trampled upon" and asks "Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us?"

Because those principles had been proclaimed, even selectively and hypocritically, Douglass was able to demand they be extended to include everyone.

And the American Revolution inspired other democratic revolutions....from France to Haiti.

rebelafrika
5th July 2003, 19:20
The so-called amerikkkan revolution was not a revolution at all. It was a fight between the son (amerikkkan colonies) and the father (Europe) over who was going to reap the bounty of their piracy.

But if you are saying that Capitalism was at one point a revolutionary system and a progressive step forward from Fuedalism, I agree.

Chinjanista
5th July 2003, 20:42
why three k's on american?

Felicia
5th July 2003, 22:53
Oh say can you see, by the donzeeerrrrrrlyyyyyy light

Bush is a capitalist
6th July 2003, 00:02
Quote: from Chinjanista on 8:42 pm on July 5, 2003
why three k's on american?


To signify the Ku Klux Klans roots in the United States.

fuck Bush
6th July 2003, 00:20
another day since iraq has become "indepedent" of it's oil.

CompadreGuerrillera
6th July 2003, 08:02
see, the thing that makes THIS past 4th of July hypocritical, is that the Americans once gained their independence from an imperialist:England, and now Iraq is being occupied by an imperialist:America, it seems so hypocritical, altho every-year does seem hypocritical. This one was more hypocritical then the rest, in my opinion.

Severian
12th July 2003, 04:40
Quote: from rebelafrika on 7:20 pm on July 5, 2003
The so-called amerikkkan revolution was not a revolution at all. It was a fight between the son (amerikkkan colonies) and the father (Europe) over who was going to reap the bounty of their piracy.

But if you are saying that Capitalism was at one point a revolutionary system and a progressive step forward from Fuedalism, I agree.


Yes, and your first paragraph doesn't contradict the idea that it was a capitalist revolution.

Edit: CompadreGuerrillera brings up an interesting point. This is not the first time the U.S. has been imperialist, of course; but it does mark a departure towards direct colonialism.

Throughout U.S. history, many people have been uncomfortable with direct colonialism, to a greater degree than in some other countries maybe. The origin of the U.S. may have something to do with this...

(Edited by Severian at 4:43 am on July 12, 2003)

Hampton
12th July 2003, 07:21
Intresting fact about the Revolutionary war: More blacks fought with the British than on the side of the colonial rabble, and that over 25,000 former slaves left America with the British army in 1781-83.

Nobody
14th July 2003, 03:56
Sadly, many blacks became slaves in the Brit's sugar island. If you went to Canada you were free, went to Barbatoas, return to the chains.

Severian
14th July 2003, 18:14
Quote: from Hampton on 7:21 am on July 12, 2003
Intresting fact about the Revolutionary war: More blacks fought with the British than on the side of the colonial rabble, and that over 25,000 former slaves left America with the British army in 1781-83.


Not specially interesting. More colonial whites probably fought with the Brits, too. It's normal for the army of the established order to be larger, sometimes much larger, than the army of the revolution.

Interesting use of the word "rabble" on a communist board.

Hampton
14th July 2003, 19:49
Sorry, next time I'll dumb down my nouns to meet your pleasure and post more intresting factoids about the Revolutionary War.