Is this true or is it just "don't tread on me"

[Cheung Mo]

http://www.lp.org/fp/article_381.shtml

To be fair, I'm not entirely hostile to the U.S. Libertarian Party: They were my first real exposure to civil libertarianism when I was younger (although I've since turned against their economic views) and I would proudly support Loretta Nall for governor if I lived in Talibama.

[red team]

Don't get your hopes up. Libertarians would simply ride in their private jets to some other province or country which allows abortion and other civil liberties.

Think about it. No taxes or government services. No public schools, police, fire, healthcare, mail, communications and utilities? Which strata of society would support such an economic set up other than the super rich who became super rich from profiteering and who's main enemy is the tax man?

Libertarians are whiny cappie *****es who complain because they can't find any reason why there should be laws against every immoral, unethical and disgusting things they want to do because it "limits their freedom". Rich western pedophile "tourists" comes to mind.

[Severian]

Is what true? That U.S. sovereignty is in danger? Hardly. What country has the power to force the U.S. to do anything against its will?

That it's a danger to the democratic rights of people in the U.S. and other countries? Maybe - why not check what the EFF, the ACLU, and other civil liberties groups have to say?

And if the Libertarians taught you civil liberties...then they didn't do a very good job, Mr. Call for Arbitrary Mass Executions at every opportunity.

Oh, and I'm getting sick of ignorant assumers making sweeping generalizations about the southern U.S.