Log in

View Full Version : Communism In The Past - Have any countries ever been even va



CubanFox
14th June 2003, 08:27
Well, have they?

Have any countries been at all communist?

I'm including places like Saxony that were communist for like a year.

Emmanual Goldstein
14th June 2003, 08:39
Interesting question. I suppose we should include the time honored leftist answers of the Paris Commune and Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War. Included with those we might add Grenada or Nicaragua during their own respective revolutionary situations.

However, a more important consideration would be that in times of crisis, vast underground economies can appear that show vaugely communistic principles. From the "unemployment councils" in America during the Great Depression to the social network established by the National Liberation Front of Vietnam in their 30 year independance struggle, these people's economies have risen time and time again.

Saint-Just
14th June 2003, 23:02
There are enough countries that have been so absoultely communist that I can't be bothered to name them all, a few: PRC, USSR, Cuba, DPRK, GDR, Albania etc.

Emmanual Goldstein, Orwell wasn't a Marixst. In addition, this character was supposedly meant to reflect Leon Trotsky, I do not imagine Trotsky would quite endorse your avatar. He may to some extent, but I do not think it is much to do with him. He was fairly brutal and led a large army.

CubanFox, since you call yourself that, surely you would say Cuba was a communist country.

Non-Sectarian Bastard!
15th June 2003, 01:01
CM how did you get the idea that EG claims Orwell to be a marxist?

BTW Emmanuel Goldstien cool name. Too bad EG was a figure made up to generate hate and energy from the people.

CubanFox
15th June 2003, 01:34
Never heard much about the Eastern Bloc aside from Romania. How well did they fare during the "communist" period? I've heard some nice things about Hoxha's Albania...

malachi151
15th June 2003, 02:41
Quote: from Chairman Mao on 11:02 pm on June 14, 2003
There are enough countries that have been so absoultely communist that I can't be bothered to name them all, a few: PRC, USSR, Cuba, DPRK, GDR, Albania etc.

Emmanual Goldstein, Orwell wasn't a Marixst. In addition, this character was supposedly meant to reflect Leon Trotsky, I do not imagine Trotsky would quite endorse your avatar. He may to some extent, but I do not think it is much to do with him. He was fairly brutal and led a large army.

CubanFox, since you call yourself that, surely you would say Cuba was a communist country.


I don't consider any country that was not democratic to have been Communist. Without Democracy you don't have Communism.

Nobody
15th June 2003, 03:00
Chairman Mao, none of the countries you gave were communist. The closes would have been Cuba, which is socialist, but DPRK is now a monarchy with a Mandate from Heaven (rainbows around the sun anyone?). The USSR stopped having any vestiages of being communist when Stalin came to power, destroying Lenin's dream of pure communism. PRC is closer to being Facist then communist. If they were so communist, they why are they trying to turn Shanghi (spelling) into the next Hong Kong. HK is so capitailistic that is not fun, being a big banking hub and what not. In addition to trying to mimic the Capitailist system, but staterun manner, how are they any better then U$. They remind me of the Italian econmy under Musolli. I need to do more research into Albania. the closes to a communst society we have ever gotten was the anarchists control of Lisbon in the thirties, the Paris Commue, or that little island of 300 inhabants in the Cribbiean.

Emmanual Goldstein
15th June 2003, 09:49
Lev, from the little I've read about Albania they were somewhat similar to the DPRK. For anything to be communist from my perpsective, it would have to include dempcratic control over the economy and democratic control over the workplace. If we accept that definition, the places that the Chairman mentioned in his post were not communist.

Thank you, CCCP, for pointing out that I never asserted that Orwell was a Marxist, even though I should probably point out that he wrote an entire book about fighting in a Marxist militia in Spain. In the Chairman's narrow view, I suppose something has to fit his narrow, authoritarian vision of Marxism in order to be good.

Nobody
15th June 2003, 13:20
In my opinion a communist society should be one party, becasue the people are happy and don't see a better alternative. If you have to use the army to crack down on dissedents then you are a dictarship of the Party, not of the working class.

Communist Superhero
15th June 2003, 15:03
"here are enough countries that have been so absoultely communist that I can't be bothered to name them all, a few: PRC, USSR, Cuba, DPRK, GDR, Albania etc. "

This is an absurd statement and one that you should re-evaluate.

I am not sure exactly what school of thought you assign yourself with, but it surely is not communism.

Communism is a beautiful ideology. It resembles logic out of which grows freedom and the passion for life. It is reality, where every human enjoys the fruits of their labour, and lives side by side in peace and friendship. "Man will become immeasurably stronger, wiser, and subtler; his body will become more harmonious, his movements more rhythmic, his voice more musical. The forms of life will become dynamically dramatic. The average human type will rise to the heights of an Aristotle, a Goethe, or a Marx. And above these heights, new peaks will rise." - Leon Trotsky. These are not principles that we as Communists can compromise on, these are principles that should be burnt into our minds.

Communism is a stateless society based on common responsiblity not on state oppression "While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State" - Lenin.

Communism can only be won through an international struggle, not through isolated nations!

In order to make this a reality, the working class must be conscious, they must awake from this day dream and realise their material significance in society. Do you think that the workers in North Korea (it is an outrage to call it the Democratic Peoples Republic) are conscious of their material significance. Do you believe that they live in Freedom and enjoy the fruits of their labour. They live in fear of oppression, they have no food to eat. the government expropriates land from peasents and hands it over to army generals and government officials. There is no common responsibility, there is state control, with a state apparatus to suppress the workers and coerce them into hailing some meglamaniac who thinks he is God.

This my friend, is far from Communism.

in 1940, while Hitler in the west of poland was murdering poles etc, Stalin was enslaving them in the East. Women and children forced to work as slaves in Russia. Are these ideals which Marx or Lenin spoke off? I think not. The mass purges of the thirties, the suppression of any kind of opposition. Stalin rubbed shoulders wiht Roosavelt and Churchil, and carved up Europe with the same Nationalistic zealousness as Hitler. Stalin was a treator to Communism, and demonstrated as much when he ordered an ice pick to be burried into Trotskys head.

The PRC which has just signed up to the World Trade Organization which is partly responisble for the chaos in Argentina, where the police routinly beat and murder members of the working class who protest because they have no food are no better then any bourgois nation. Let us remember Tiannaman Square 1989.

And with all this in mind, all three of those countries have or had vast armies and promote nuclear weapons, of which killed millions of japense workers in 1945. These are not ideals harboured by communists, they are haboured by evil and cruel men who use communism not as a force for the emanciptaion of the working class, but for the suppression of it. These countries do not believe in the consciousness of the workers, but the subornitation of them to the state.

Every day I have to fight and argue with people to try and explain that these countries where not communist, that Communism is an ideology which means to elevate the oppressed from their exploitation, yet there are treators like you who spin the propoganda and give support to the oppressors and exploiters. You make a mockery of mine and my comrades efforts to build a revolution.

"Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!"

Pete
15th June 2003, 15:34
#Moderation Mode

About the past.

Moved here (http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/topic.pl?forum=26&topic=411)