Log in

View Full Version : Nixon Considered Using Nukes In Vietnam



Janus
1st August 2006, 20:18
Originally posted by AP News
President Nixon, in his first year in office and eager to end an unpopular war that killed tens of thousands of U.S. troops, considered using nuclear weapons against the North Vietnamese, recently declassified documents show.

By mid-1969, Nixon and national security adviser Henry Kissinger had settled on a strategy using international diplomacy with threats of force against the communists ruling the north in an attempt to get them to buckle, according to an analysis of the papers by the National Security Archive. The private research group is headquartered at George Washington University.

Kissinger and his staff began developing contingency military plans under the code name of "Duck Hook." He also created a committee within the National Security Council to evaluate secret plans prepared by Joint Chiefs of Staff in Washington and military planners in Saigon.

A pair of declassified documents raised the question of nuclear weapons use in connection with the military operation against the north, which was fighting to reunite with the democratic south, according to the archive.

The first is a Sept. 29, 1969, memo from two Kissinger aides — Roger Morris and Anthony Lake — to Capt. Rembrandt Robinson, who had a central role in preparing the Duck Hook plans. Robinson had prepared a paper for the NSC committee outlining the Joint Chiefs plans to attack North Vietnam.

But the archive says Morris and Lake, unhappy with the document, asked Robinson to rework it to present "clearly and fully all the implications of the (Duck Hook) action, should the president decide to do it."

They said the president needed to decide in advance "the fateful question of how far we will go. He cannot, for example, confront the issue of using tactical nuclear weapons in the midst of the exercise. He must be prepared to play out whatever string necessary in this case."

The second document is an Oct. 2, 1969, memo from Kissinger to Nixon, introducing an NSC staff report on the state of military planning for Duck Hook. The report said the basic objective of the operation would be to coerce Hanoi "to negotiate a compromise settlement through a series of military blows," which would walk the fine line between inflicting "unacceptable damage to their society" and causing the "total destruction of the country or the regime."

But Nixon abandoned Duck Hook shortly after Oct. 2. Both his secretaries of Defense and State, Melvin Laird and William Rogers, opposed the plan. Nixon apparently also began to doubt whether he could sustain public support for the three- to six-month period the plan might require. He also concluded that his military threats against the North Vietnamese had no effect.

U.S. troops remained in the country throughout Nixon's first term despite a gradual withdrawal of forces that he began in 1969. Nixon was re-elected in 1972 and secured a cease-fire agreement the following year, but it was never implemented.

Two years later, in 1975, North Vietnamese forces overran the South, reuniting the country under Communist rule.

What do you think? Personally, I don't think it's very surprising since these types of plans are probably developed in pretty much every US war since WWII.

ComradeOm
1st August 2006, 21:18
The military loves nukes but politicians hate them. MacArthur was sacked during the Korean War because he was pushing nuking China.

Janus
1st August 2006, 23:24
Yep, politicians understand the political risks while military officials have nothing better to do than plan all the time.

I'm sure they put up a lot of other plans as well concerning every weapon in their arsenal. That's just what professional military planners do.

Gold Against The Soul
2nd August 2006, 00:17
The US once planned to fake terrorist attacks on civilians and blame it on Cuba, as a pretext for an invasion (Sound familar?). This is no crazy conspiracy either. It is a fact : Google 'Operation Northwoods'

So this sort of thing is not surprising at all. They'll consider anything to stop anyone who gets in their way.

Morag
2nd August 2006, 06:00
I agree with Janus that this isn't surprising. If you have a weapon in your arsenal, you need to have some plan of when you may or will not use it. And contingency plans during war are common; every country has them, I'm sure. Rumsfeld has admitted that the US currently has plans for the invasion of almost every nation on earth- it might be a bad example, but I don't think the US plans to invade all the countries it has contingency plans for. Just the really really annoying ones. :)