You Communist Women Must Hate...

[ebeneezer]

Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own $1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)

[B.E. Jones]

*Deleted*

My post was as pointless as the original post.

[Whitten]

Dont you think thats a rather pathetic existance? Not everyone worships the dollar

[Black Dagger]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 07:18 PM
Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own $1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)
What is the point of this thread?

[Mujer Libre]

Yeah because communist women are all after money and men who fit rigid gender-role stereotypes. (And yeah, we're WOMEN, not girls)

And we combine the two by relying on men to provide us with money and happiness.

Oh and we're all hetero.

I can't believe I wasted two minutes on this thread.

[RaiseYourVoice]

Originally posted by Mujer [email protected] 31 2006, 10:46 AM
Yeah because communist women are all after money and men who fit rigid gender-role stereotypes. (And yeah, we're WOMEN, not girls)

And we combine the two by relying on men to provide us with money and happiness.

Oh and we're all hetero.

I can't believe I wasted two minutes on this thread.
i just quote this so i dont waste two minutes on this thread but only one...
i am no women though so in my mind i replaced we by women

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by Mujer [email protected] 31 2006, 10:46 AM
Yeah because communist women are all after money and men who fit rigid gender-role stereotypes. (And yeah, we're WOMEN, not girls)

And we combine the two by relying on men to provide us with money and happiness.

Oh and we're all hetero.

I can't believe I wasted two minutes on this thread.
I can't beleive that three of you didn't get hte point of this thread...

Point) Any girl who dreams of being a princess cannot be communist for obvious reasons. Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.




Yeah because communist women are all after money and men who fit rigid gender-role stereotypes. (And yeah, we're WOMEN, not girls)

Sure your not wimin or womyn or somehting like that to remove the masculine root making it "womb-men"? I mean that part's representative of man's hedgemony over the earth, right? And his philological hedgemenoy over the development of languege right?

Gee, sorry to DEFAME you. And What's wrong with me calling women girls? Gee, U sound just like one of my ex who kept telling me how 'sexist' i was being. What if I called you a chick, u wouldn't like that would u? And yet lotsa girls use that word in describing themselves. Call me a boy and I won't cry foul murder despite the fact there have been matriarchal societies such as the Minoans and early Welsh and even the Tamazight Berbers of North Africa EXISTING TODAY where the males wear veils and not females and the female name is the surname! How's that for oppression!!! Anyway, you can only be insulted if you have respect for me, which I'm guessing since im capitst you dont.

[Qwerty Dvorak]

Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.
Source please

[Rollo]

It's stereotypical to say all women are narcisists.

[Herman]

Im guessing at least 95%.

YOUR guess? Oh of course! Your guess represents the entire population of women on Earth or the US of A or whatever. I mean, you can read the minds of women. They're completely transparent to you, like an open children's book, ready to be flung open and read.


Gee, sorry to DEFAME you. And What's wrong with me calling women girls? Gee, U sound just like one of my ex who kept telling me how 'sexist' i was being

It's wrong because:

a) A girl, as we know it, is an underaged (below 18) human female. A woman is someone who is or is more than 18, in other words, AN ADULT.

b) There is no b). I just wrote this so as to make it look like there was another reason.


Call me a boy and I won't cry foul murder despite the fact there have been matriarchal societies such as the Minoans and early Welsh and even the Tamazight Berbers of North Africa EXISTING TODAY where the males wear veils and not females and the female name is the surname! How's that for oppression!!!

Oh right. It's so unfair that Minoan and Welsh woman have oppressed men for... how long? Compared to the subordination of women to men in the majority of the world for most part of history?

[Whitten]

I can't beleive that three of you didn't get hte point of this thread...

Point) Any girl who dreams of being a princess cannot be communist for obvious reasons. Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.

you really do live in your own little dream world, domt you?

[RaiseYourVoice]

In germany all the royal are nuts, some make shows like the osbourne show, i highly doubt many german girls or women would want a prince.

and if your definition of a prince is just a man with money and a castle i wonder whos dream that would be.

if you are just talking about a girl meeting the man of her dreams, hell good for her! if he has a castle and money, thats nice!

if she though all night dreams of a man with money and a castle, that pretty damn sad.

i like especially how you are not defining a character apart from him being charming and confident, by that you are reducing the dream guy to a strict material backround, with variable charateristics for everyone to find their own prince in the person. thats exactly what fairytails do, they present you completly flat characters, which you can fill with your owns experience so they fit everyone.

[Forward Union]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 11:33 AM
I can't beleive that three of you didn't get hte point of this thread...

Point) Any girl who dreams of being a princess cannot be communist for obvious reasons. Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.



So some fairy tale dream that 5 year olds have is somehow an argument against communism, I have to give you 100% for creative criticism :lol:

But what's more, the title "princess" is of a feudal society, and so their desire to be a princess is also a rejection of your ideal, capitalist society. There's nothing free about a market based on bloodline eh?

five year old kids against capitalism! :lol:

[somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback]

Labeled "D" for Dumb Thread

[Black Dagger]

Originally posted by ebeneezer+--> (ebeneezer)Anyway, you can only be insulted if you have respect for me, which I'm guessing since im capitst you dont.[/b]

What are you talking about? Anyone can insult anyone, there's no special rule that states that if you dont have respect for someone you can't be insulted by what they say to you :wacko:


ebeneezer
Any girl who dreams of being a princess cannot be communist for obvious reasons. Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.

Okay, so you're saying that most female communists secretly want to be princesses? Because 'at least 95%' of wom*n includes millions of communists.

And the 'princess' stereotype is culturally specific - and no, not specific to anywhere near the majority of the world's population, least of all 'at least 95%' as you claim/made up on the spot.

And seriously, how many wom*n above the age of 6 'dream of being a princess' in 2006? For fuck's sake :rolleyes:


And What's wrong with me calling women girls? Gee, U sound just like one of my ex who kept telling me how 'sexist' i was being.

Can't take a hint can you?

You don't think if wom*n keep callin you sexist... uh... you might actually be one? :o

How about you listen to what wom*n are telling you about your attitude towards them, and modify your approach accordingly?

[somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 10:18 AM
Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own $1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)
You get a 1 on the schale of v.P ;)

[Entrails Konfetti]

You're an idiot, this isn't a real-life senario.
All the prince would want from a working-class Communist women is a fuck.

[Corvus]

Replace the monarchic title 'princess' with person.

Replace the ball dress with a simple sun dress and blue sweat-shop free demin jeans underneath.

Replace the glamourous ball with a environmental protest.

Replace the sterotypical male (nothing wrong with them and all, let people be people, but not my thing) with a passionate eco-communist womyn.

Take away all that money, and replace it with a Hippie Commune (like the one I live in)

And the abiltiy to live out my life as how I please with the one I love.

And sure, you got a pretty nice picture that I like. But Im wierd and different, I dont know if any other womyn would share such a dream.

[dannie]

this guy has nothing to say, at least some of the other cappies on this board use arguments

filed under useless

[Morag]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 09:18 AM
Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own $1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)
No, Ebeneezer, we don't dread fairy tales. They are told to children along with tales about Santa and the Easter Bunny for a reason, and we all know it.


Point) Any girl who dreams of being a princess cannot be communist for obvious reasons. Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.


As it turns out, communists don't have to be poor. Moreover, fuck you. Stop telling women what they can and cannot do.


Gee, U sound just like one of my ex who kept telling me how 'sexist' i was being. What if I called you a chick, u wouldn't like that would u? And yet lotsa girls use that word in describing themselves.

Why do all you whiny little cappie bastards come crying to the communists about how wretched women are? Get a life, we don't care.

My points. 1). Women can do and think whatever they like, so long as they aren't harming people, and this includes dating anyone they like for any reason they might have. 2). I don't really have a two, because it's early, but I think number one is good enough. Ebeneezer, you don't get to decide what communist women can or cannot do or think.

[OneBrickOneVoice]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 09:18 AM
Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own $1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)
Rememeber, for every 1 cinderella story there are a million sweatshop-minimum wage-living in the ghetto etc... stories

[The Sloth]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 09:18 AM
Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own $1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)
to be taken away somewhere, not having to face the general, everyday bullshit.. well, why the hell not? doesn't everyone want to live in peace, and in security?

[red team]

Rememeber, for every 1 cinderella story there are a million sweatshop-minimum wage-living in the ghetto etc... stories

Which is why Cinderella stories are so appealing and so useful to the elites including the Capitalist elite. Take the bait and you can share in the luxurious life afforded by a robber baron.

[PRC-UTE]

this should win some kind of award. :P

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by PRC-[email protected] 1 2006, 04:26 AM
this should win some kind of award. :P
Tell me about it. :)

I think some of you have seen that princess-like happiness can only be possible under capitalism.

If capitlaism dies, the Cindarella stories die with it... Do you want this?

[Black Dagger]

Originally posted by ebeneezer
If capitlaism dies, the Cindarella stories die with it... Do you want this?

Who cares?

[RaiseYourVoice]

I think some of you have seen that princess-like happiness can only be possible under capitalism.

actually princess like happiness should only happen in a monarchy, no?

[Forward Union]

Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2006, 07:10 AM
I think some of you have seen that princess-like happiness can only be possible under capitalism.

If capitlaism dies, the Cindarella stories die with it... Do you want this?
no, it's impossible in Capitalism, to achieve the title of princess (or be born with it) in any meaningful way, is only possible within a Feudal society or consitutional monarchy, you fucking idiot.

As for cinderalla, that's impossible in all political systems, because magical fairy godmothers don't exist.

[Morag]

Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2006, 07:10 AM


I think some of you have seen that princess-like happiness can only be possible under capitalism.

If capitlaism dies, the Cindarella stories die with it... Do you want this?
Not true. My daddy built me and my sisters a castle when we were little, without having a Prince Charming or a million dollars. It might double as a shed and be made out of 2x4's, but it has a drawbridge, a spiral staircase and turrets, and you can see the entire town from the top of it. It's also real, and that's more important then any pipe dream.

But then, my dad is a real prince, not a fairy tale prince, so I'm probably biased.

[Dyst]

Uhhh. Dude.

Prince/princess stories are hardly a product of capitalism, if that's what you are suggesting. :huh: :P

Anyways, who of us are princesses/princes? None. See, this topic has no meaning in real life. Which you wouldn't know about, jerk.

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by Additives Free+Aug 1 2006, 09:34 AM--> (Additives Free @ Aug 1 2006, 09:34 AM)
[email protected] 1 2006, 07:10 AM
I think some of you have seen that princess-like happiness can only be possible under capitalism.

If capitlaism dies, the Cindarella stories die with it... Do you want this?
no, it's impossible in Capitalism, to achieve the title of princess (or be born with it) in any meaningful way, is only possible within a Feudal society or consitutional monarchy, you fucking idiot.

As for cinderalla, that's impossible in all political systems, because magical fairy godmothers don't exist. [/b]
Actually, there are thousands and thousands of rich European royalty in today's capitalism.

And even if there werenot, lets say I buy my girl a chateaux and put a tiara around her head. Isn't that the same thing? I'd love to see you let me do that in your system.

[Jazzratt]

What the fuck is this dribbly shite? I'm away for all of three days and this board goes to the fucking dogs. We have Patton being an internet tough guy and getting banned and we have Ebeneezer typing this crap out.

Who the fuck wants to be cinderalla now? Maybe, MAYBE a three or four year old. You're accusing a set of intellegent, level headed women of pursuing a fucking fairytale. This is fairly obvious sexism.

Come on, I mean commie men don't want to be that prince charming do they? Why the fuck, if the men don't want to be princes, would the women want to be princesses? More to the point what the fuck is wrong with you?

I suggest you fuck off now whilst you have some sembelance of a vestige of an illusion of respect.

[TC]

Everyone, or rather everyone who is single, wants to meet and fall in love with a confident, sexy, attractive person of the prefered gender.

And everyone wants financial security.

To the extent that 'cinderella stories' have universial appeal, its because these are universially desirable things, i think men want them as well.

Theres nothing wrong with a communist wanting it...communists are communists percisely because we understand just how important having money is and we want to ensure that everyone has financial security, while capitalists think financial security is a privilege, communists think it is a human entitlement.

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2006, 04:16 PM
Everyone, or rather everyone who is single, wants to meet and fall in love with a confident, sexy, attractive person of the prefered gender.

And everyone wants financial security.

To the extent that 'cinderella stories' have universial appeal, its because these are universially desirable things, i think men want them as well.

Theres nothing wrong with a communist wanting it...communists are communists percisely because we understand just how important having money is and we want to ensure that everyone has financial security, while capitalists think financial security is a privilege, communists think it is a human entitlement.
Sure, I didn't mean to restrict this to women. Men too wouldn't mind falling in love with cute rich girl. But for me money is not an issue as it is perhaps with girls.

I mean look at Cindarella, Jane Eyre, Pride and Prejudice, Joe Millionaire, etc, etc, etc.

Always a rich guy. Why? Being a princess is a bigger dream for girls than a prince is for guys. Absolute fact.

And no, financial security is not a human right. I think I will start a thread upon this issue.

[Raisa]

I hate all disney stories before 1993 just about......

They always paint the protagonist white as if cinderella isnt worthy of compassion if she had dark thick hair and semetic features (no not JEW< but semetic)
like the person they always put as bad.

WHo ever wrote that shit was a white supremacist and their movies aint shit&#33;

[RedAnarchist]

Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 12:05 PM
I hate all disney stories before 1993 just about......

They always paint the protagonist white as if cinderella isnt worthy of compassion if she had dark thick hair and semetic features (no not JEW< but semetic)
like the person they always put as bad.

WHo ever wrote that shit was a white supremacist and their movies aint shit&#33;
Disney was a known fascist, so it wouldnt surprise me if his crap was full of rascist shit.

[TC]

Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 11:05 AM
I hate all disney stories before 1993 just about......

They always paint the protagonist white as if cinderella isnt worthy of compassion if she had dark thick hair and semetic features (no not JEW< but semetic)
like the person they always put as bad.

WHo ever wrote that shit was a white supremacist and their movies aint shit&#33;
Snow White, despite the name, had black hair and black or very dark brown eyes, no?

Jasmine from the pre-1993 disney film was &#39;semetic&#39;/arab.

Belle in Beauty and the Beast (also, pre-1993) had dark hair and dark eyes.

[somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback]

And there were anti-nazi cartoons during WW2 of Donald Duck ridiculing Hitler.

[colonelguppy]

i apologize for capitalists everywhere for this thread.

[Raisa]

snow white is the only eception.
Beauty and the beast ....and jasmine are recent.
But in beauty and the beast the bad guy looks like more of a semite then belle.
And the beast turns into a white man when his curse is lifted.

I think they used to be anti semetic.

[somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback]

Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 06:33 PM
i apologize for capitalists everywhere for this thread.
:D It&#39;s ok, we know ebeneezer is... "special" ;)

[Morag]

Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 07:55 PM
snow white is the only eception.
Beauty and the beast ....and jasmine are recent.
But in beauty and the beast the bad guy looks like more of a semite then belle.
And the beast turns into a white man when his curse is lifted.

I think they used to be anti semetic.
Gaston (the bad guy in Beauty and the Beast) looks pretty French, actually, which is what they were all supposed to be.

I think Disney&#39;s policy of how to design characters might have something to do with where the stories are from. I don&#39;t know much about fairy tales outside of the European cultures, so I can&#39;t really say whether they all have counter-parts (though I know Cinderella specifically has a Chinese counterpart that ain&#39;t Mulan)

[RevSouth]

Torch castles. :P Fucking byproducts of feudalism and oppression in one of its oldest forms.

Jasmine was downright attractive for a cartoon character.

And I don&#39;t think Donald Duck was a disney character.

[Zero]

=&#092;

Castles are really really sweet IMO. Sure they represent fudal intrests...

but when was the last time you heard someone saying "Hey you guys&#33; Hey&#33; Okay. Stop going to work, and warship me. Because I&#39;m your king."

When I was in France I had the privilage to go visit Mon St. Michelle... a castle built upon a mountain in the middle of a beach, about a mile off of the coast. It was magnificent.

http://www.rdrop.com/~mbliss/France/Mt._St._Michel1.JPG

[bezdomni]

Being a princess is a bigger dream for girls than a prince is for guys. Absolute fact.
You produce a lot of unsubstantiated "absolute facts".

[Rosa Lichtenstein]

Eben-queezier:


Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own &#036;1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)

Speaking for myself, I look forward to the day, so I can knee him in the capaitalist nuts.

[Red Heretic]

Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 10:07 AM
I mean look at Cindarella, Jane Eyre, Pride and Prejudice, Joe Millionaire, etc, etc, etc.
Oh, so if the bourgeoisie produces male chauvinistic movies and television shows, then that obviously reflects the truth.

Your posts are nothing more than a bunch of male chauvinist bullshit, mish mashed with subjective ramblings.

[Xiao Banfa]

There will be no millionaires in socialist society, no royalty, no fucking parasitic aristocracy or bourgeoisie living in obcene luxury at the expense of everyone else&#39;s leisure and financial security.

I think ebeneezer may require a little more time in the re-education camps than the other bourgeois.

[Matty_UK]

Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 10:07 AM
I mean look at Cindarella, Jane Eyre, Pride and Prejudice, Joe Millionaire, etc, etc, etc.
Obviously you haven&#39;t read the book. If you had you&#39;d know Jane Eyre rejects being dependant on a man and only marries Rochester when she has acquired her own wealth and he is blind and poor.

[Domino]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 05:33 AM
Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.
I suppose I&#39;m in the 5% of that then. This is one of the most stupid threads I&#39;ve seen.

[pandora]

Originally posted by ebeneezer+Jul 31 2006, 03:03 PM--> (ebeneezer @ Jul 31 2006, 03:03 PM)
Mujer [email protected] 31 2006, 10:46 AM
Yeah because communist women are all after money and men who fit rigid gender-role stereotypes. (And yeah, we&#39;re WOMEN, not girls)

And we combine the two by relying on men to provide us with money and happiness.

Oh and we&#39;re all hetero.

I can&#39;t believe I wasted two minutes on this thread.
I can&#39;t beleive that three of you didn&#39;t get hte point of this thread...

Point) Any girl who dreams of being a princess cannot be communist for obvious reasons. Now what percentage want to be princesses? Im guessing at least 95%.




Yeah because communist women are all after money and men who fit rigid gender-role stereotypes. (And yeah, we&#39;re WOMEN, not girls)

Sure your not wimin or womyn or somehting like that to remove the masculine root making it "womb-men"? I mean that part&#39;s representative of man&#39;s hedgemony over the earth, right? And his philological hedgemenoy over the development of languege right?

Gee, sorry to DEFAME you. And What&#39;s wrong with me calling women girls? Gee, U sound just like one of my ex who kept telling me how &#39;sexist&#39; i was being. What if I called you a chick, u wouldn&#39;t like that would u? And yet lotsa girls use that word in describing themselves. Call me a boy and I won&#39;t cry foul murder despite the fact there have been matriarchal societies such as the Minoans and early Welsh and even the Tamazight Berbers of North Africa EXISTING TODAY where the males wear veils and not females and the female name is the surname&#33; How&#39;s that for oppression&#33;&#33;&#33; Anyway, you can only be insulted if you have respect for me, which I&#39;m guessing since im capitst you dont. [/b]
What the heck are you talking about, where is your data for the idea that 95% of women, particularly well educated women want to live a lonely existence as the concubine to a rich man in mansion while he goes out and fucks everything that lives coming home with a veneral disease, please.

You use the monikor Ebneezer because your ideas are Victorian. Not all women dream of living in the home wearing fancy dresses with braces and whale bones. MOST DON&#39;T, for your information, we prefer running through fields free to spread our wings and being happy and free. In fact in most modern marriages women are extremely sensitive to roles not wanting to end up in a cage. Freedom is one of the greatest gifts on Earth right after Life comes Liberty.

What makes you think most women would give up there liberty for a gilded cage? Love and parntership is different it is the wind beneath your wings not a clamp clamping you down, or a chain. Money is often a chain. 52% of workers are women, WORLDWIDE. How can you assume that the majority of workers do not get some sense of satisfaction at a job well done, even if they are not properly compensated for their wages.

My dreams involve freedom from wage slavery and oppression for all peoples, not just myself, how can I be free when my brothers and sisters are not. I dream of healing the planet, ice on the poles, and freedom from illness for my loved ones.

I hope to one day have a home and some family related and not that I love around me, but most wish this.

Please go back to the Victorian Era where you came out from where women were not allowed to vote least they become bad wives, and women were not told when they were infected by a vuneral disease by their husbands even when it resulted in death.

[EwokUtopia]

What the hell were you thinking when you came on here to attack left leaning women by basically calling them stupid little golddiggers deep down? You clearly dont understand women at all, and you especially dont understand the left. Any woman here would likely never be at some party where Count von Richekapitalist would be at, and if they were, I should hope they crash the fucking place. Nobody wants to live some eurotrash lifestyle revolving around porche&#39;s and fucking 50,000 dollar dresses except for stupid insecure people who have been beaten down by sexist propaganda that tells them they cant live without a prince charming. Id say fuck you, but noting your sexism, this isnt likely to happen to you for a long time.

[hoopla]

Didn&#39;t I post, some semi-inflamtorty "sexist" ;) remarks here? :huh:

Tbf on me, bah, I&#39;m allowed to be bitter, I mean no harm, and do not generalize beyond, erm... all women :huh: nah, like, blah blah blah sure that most women don&#39;t care about money (I would never say, all), its just difficult to admit, what with me being a misogonyst ;) (who strongly believes in marxist feminism) - I just like being bitter and it does no harm - if anyone is offended my the remark I think I made, I am sorry. Blah blah blah :ph34r:

[Raisa]

Really Ebenezer, if you came to marry my poor ass,
and hook me up in the game, Id allow it.
And Id take all the princess langere you buy for me and wear them for a man in the struggle while you are off playing polo, cause yall aint shit&#33; :blink:

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by Matty_UK+Aug 7 2006, 12:08 PM--> (Matty_UK @ Aug 7 2006, 12:08 PM)
[email protected] 3 2006, 10:07 AM
I mean look at Cindarella, Jane Eyre, Pride and Prejudice, Joe Millionaire, etc, etc, etc.
Obviously you haven&#39;t read the book. If you had you&#39;d know Jane Eyre rejects being dependant on a man and only marries Rochester when she has acquired her own wealth and he is blind and poor. [/b]
I have read it. We had to read it in literature lol and its &#39;sequel&#39; Wild Sargasso Sea which was shit.

And i know Jane Eyre is sorta feminist but its still a cinderella flick. (oh im so tempted to say absolute fact here...)

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by [email protected] 8 2006, 10:24 PM
What the hell were you thinking when you came on here to attack left leaning women by basically calling them stupid little golddiggers deep down? You clearly dont understand women at all, and you especially dont understand the left. Any woman here would likely never be at some party where Count von Richekapitalist would be at, and if they were, I should hope they crash the fucking place. Nobody wants to live some eurotrash lifestyle revolving around porche&#39;s and fucking 50,000 dollar dresses except for stupid insecure people who have been beaten down by sexist propaganda that tells them they cant live without a prince charming. Id say fuck you, but noting your sexism, this isnt likely to happen to you for a long time.
lol im not a sexist and certainly not when im out courting women.lol. Just b/c i talk about cindarella does not make me sexist. you guys are WAY to sensitiuve and need to chill out a little. I LOVE WOMEN AND RESPECT THEM&#33;&#33;&#33;

And I love how you used the racist slur &#39;eurotrash&#39;. anyway, europe is so socialist they have no rich people basically. Its the US where the rich come out to play.

[Jazzratt]

Originally posted by [email protected] 9 2006, 05:09 AM
europe is so socialist they have no rich people basically. Its the US where the rich come out to play.
Er...what the fuck are you talking about? I suggest you lay off the crayons a la carte and take a look at the politics of europe: you will notice that it has FUCK ALL in the way of socialist tendencies - unless you are using some previously unheard of definition of &#39;socialist&#39; which means &#39;capitalist&#39;.

[Lings]

hey ebonehead, have you ever met a woman? Like in real life? ever?

[Cryotank Screams]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 09:18 AM
Are there any girls here? You must hate the possibility of one day attending a grand ball and meeting up with a dashing ultra-confident Prince Charming man-of-your-dreams with lots of money and and nice chateaux to wisk you away to. Your own &#036;1,000,000 per annum spending account. Your own whatever-it-is-you-wish.

You must really really DREAD that possibility. Or have I exposed a little flaw?

(...sorry about that)
Shallow trinkets point to shallow feelings espoused by shallow people; true love can not be bought, it comes in no package. A tender kiss from your lover is worth more than anything that you could buy in any store. Or are you to incompetent to gain and keep a lover without trinkets?

[bezdomni]

Shallow trinkets point to shallow feelings espoused by shallow people; true love can not be bought, it comes in no package. A tender kiss from your lover is worth more than anything that you could buy in any store.
It&#39;s like a Maoist hallmark card. :wub: