Yesterday I Saw A Kid...

[General Patton]

I drove by this 12 or 13 year old kid wearing a Che T-shirt. Would it have been wrong to stick my hand out the window as I drove by hoping to smack some sense into him? I thought that that might get me into trouble, so I simply yelled to him, "nice shirt, idiot." I could tell by the look on his face that he felt like a moron. Hopefully, he will never wear that disgraceful garbage in my country ever again, as a result of my outspoken nature. Who knows, maybe I saved him the embarrassment and humiliation of becoming an actual communist. I certainly hope so. What do you think? Should I have left him well enough alone, or should I have envoked my first amendment right to ridicule someone for using theirs in an effort to promote communism? If I had a kid that wore that crap, I'd ground him until he was 18 or make him read the Constitition of the United States of America and the Federalist Papers until he understood the error of his ways. Some parents are completely AWOL when it comes to promoting good sense. Had I seen his parents walking down the street with him, I most definitely would have stuck my hand out the window hoping to smack one of them.

This raises the questions for the toy-commies on this website. What kind of parenting styles do your parents use? Are they okay with you being communists? I, myself, would be tempted to turn my kids over to the state if they held your views, because they would be advocating state involvement in their upbringing. Why not give them what they want?

I am so sick of these snot nose kids wearing this crap. Therefore, I am going to buy an anti-Che T-Shirt. For my capitalist buddies, here is the link if you are interested:

Communism Killed 100 Million People and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt (http://www.thoseshirts.com/lousy.html)

Copyright 2006

[which doctor]

I drove by this 12 or 13 year old kid wearing a Che T-shirt.
So he's older than you, huh?


Would it have been wrong to stick my hand out the window as I drove by hoping to smack some sense into him?
I don't know if it would be wrong, but it would be very stupid since scientific studies prove that slapping someone on the had will not put sense into their head.


I simply yelled to him, "nice shirt, idiot."
Real, real intelligent.


I could tell by the look on his face that he felt like a moron.
Or maybe you were looking in the mirror.


Hopefully, he will never wear that disgraceful garbage in my country ever again,
Your country? It's not yours. The corporations own America.


What do you think? Should I have left him well enough alone, or should I have envoked my first amendment right to ridicule someone for using theirs in an effort to promote communism?
Well, it's also their first amendment right to wear the shirt.


If I had a kid that wore that crap, I'd ground him until he was 18 or make him read the Constitition of the United States and the Federalist papers until he understood the error of his ways.
Well, the first amendment of the constitution does say that your kid has the right to free speech and that includes their right to wear a che shirt.

[Capitalist Lawyer]

Are you sure you're not a plant? Gosh, I wouldn't even resort to some of your arguments.

Who is this guy? And why does he keep flooding the board?

Besides, I think you made that story up...so why couldn't you just asked your question about parenting styles instead of looking like a total moron in the process?

[Entrails Konfetti]

I think he made it up, I don't understand where he'd have to go seeing how he doesn't do anything but flood these boards!


Originally posted by FOB
Your country? It's not yours. The corporations own America
Or it the indigeonous peoples land, who never felt an exclusive ownership of it since the begining.

[General Patton]

Gosh, I wouldn't even resort to some of your arguments.

Well, golly, I have seen some of yours too, and I am in complete disbelief that you are an actual lawyer.

[violencia.Proletariat]

http://www.military-collections.com/GeneralPattonMuseumPhotos/IMG_6281.jpg

[Solitary Mind]

so apparently "your" country is a country where people cant have ideas that arent yours?...nice going Adolf

[MrDoom]

Heh, even the other OI's look down on him.

[C_Rasmussen]

Hopefully for your sake you dont say that shit to someone whos a fucking hothead or you'll wish you never made those comments. Seriously you gotta watch out who you cock off to in life.

[Zero]

Why hasn't this thread spammer and troller gotten banned?

[RebelDog]

Its typical that you call yourself 'General Patton' and you think you have the right to go around slapping people when you feel like it. The US must be a real hellhole with people like you in it.

[General Patton]

so apparently "your" country is a country where people cant have ideas that arent yours?...

Of course he has that right. However, any time someone uses that right they had better be prepared for the ridicule that it might inspire. Take my case, for instance, I made a statement about not liking kids who wear Che-T-shirts on a leftist messageboard. Now, I am subject to your ridicule. However, I find that it is the leftists here that are acting as the facists, since I hear them calling for an all out ban. This is really the difference between advocates of the free market system and capitalism and those who promote the dictatorship of the proletariate. I support the right of people to make statements contrary to mine, although I would ridicule them. The left is not content merely ridiculing, because they know that their system of ideas can not hold water. Therefore, they resort to removing those they disagree with. Whether of not this is done through the use of gulags, or done through the use of a ban on a message board, the chilling effect that they wish to instill in society is much the same. Free speech can not and will not exist in a communist community, no matter the size or the nature of the community. Revolutionaryleft.com's use of the ban provides further evidence of this. By using the ban, you only prove that my assertions about communism have been correct all along, as you are acting in a manner which is consistent with those states that have actually imposed communistic edicts.


Hopefully for your sake you dont say that shit to someone whos a fucking hothead or you'll wish you never made those comments. Seriously you gotta watch out who you cock off to in life.

Why, because you think it's alright for someone to commit a crime against someone they disagree with? Not only are communists intellectually and logically weak, they prove themselves to be hypocrites virtually every time they open their mouths. You would disagree if I were to stick my hand out the window and slap somebody (which I remind you, I didn't do) for what they believe, yet you condone use of violence when it is against someone that you disagree with. Too funny. Perhaps this is why communists find it hard to debate. The more they talk the easier it is too see through the bullshit that they claim to believe.

Copyright 2006

[MichaelCollins]

General Patton:

The Federalist Papers are just about the most offensive piece of garbage in the world. So is the Constitution. If you read Patick Henry's speeches to the Virginia Radifaction Committee, you will see why. Read his speaches and others found in the Anti-Federalist Papers and then tell me that they totally didn't call Clinton and Bush Jr. when they opposed the radification of the Constitution.

Ruby Ridge, Waco, the gun-grab in New Orleans after Katrina, the PATRIOT ACT, et cetera. These things were TOTALLY forscene by the Anti-Federalists and why I am one.

[General Patton]

So what are you, a confederate? YeeeeHaaaw!

[MichaelCollins]

Originally posted by General [email protected] 31 2006, 04:57 AM
So what are you, a confederate?
The Anti-Federalist Papers also show how some of the arguments used to leigimize secession are flawed. I am not a Confederate, though some of my ancestors were CSA officers (some were also Union officers)

I'm an economic Distributivist and a radical decentralist -- not quite an Anarchist but by no means do I subscribe the the economics of the Libertarians.

[General Patton]

You interest me. Go ahead and describe a bit more about your political and economic leanings. Define economic distributism and radical decentralism for me, using your own interpretation. Basically, it sounds like you promote overthrowing the current U.S. government.

[C_Rasmussen]

Originally posted by General [email protected] 30 2006, 10:50 PM

so apparently "your" country is a country where people cant have ideas that arent yours?...

Of course he has that right. However, any time someone uses that right they had better be prepared for the ridicule that it might inspire. Take my case, for instance, I made a statement about not liking kids who wear Che-T-shirts on a leftist messageboard. Now, I am subject to your ridicule. However, I find that it is the leftists here that are acting as the facists, since I hear them calling for an all out ban. This is really the difference between advocates of the free market system and capitalism and those who promote the dictatorship of the proletariate. I support the right of people to make statements contrary to mine, although I would ridicule them. The left is not content merely ridiculing, because they know that their system of ideas can not hold water. Therefore, they resort to removing those they disagree with. Whether of not this is done through the usse of gulags, or done through the use of a ban on a message board, the chilling effect that they wish to instill in society is much the same. Free speech can not and will not exist in a communist community, no matter the size or the nature of the community. Revolutionaryleft.com's use of the ban provides further evidence of this. By using the ban, you only prove that my assertions about communism have been correct all along, as you are acting in a manner which is consistent with those states that have actually imposed communistic edicts.


Hopefully for your sake you dont say that shit to someone whos a fucking hothead or you'll wish you never made those comments. Seriously you gotta watch out who you cock off to in life.

Why, because you think it's alright for someone to commit a crime against someone they disagree with? Not only are communists intellectually and logically weak, they prove themselves to be hypocrits virtually every time they open their mouths. You would disagree if I were to stick my hand out the window and slap somebody (which I remind you, I didn't do) for what they believe, yet you condone use of violence when it is against someone that you disagree with. Too funny. Perhaps this is why communists find it hard to debate. The more they talk the easier it is too see through the bullshit that they claim to believe.
Yeah it is wrong to fuckin hit someone over a shirt. You have no business starting shit with people. You're pretty hypocritical there yourself, GP. Why you may ask? Oh I dont know because you call us weak yet you talk shit to someone FROM THE SAFETY OF A MOVING VEHICLE. How is that NOT weak? If I have an issue with someone I take it up with them face to face like it should be done, not like some idiot who's too scared to do it alone. Afraid you'd get punched out by a 12 year old? :lol:

[General Patton]

Yeah it is wrong to fuckin hit someone over a shirt. You have no business starting shit with people. You're pretty hypocritical there yourself, GP. Why you may ask? Oh I dont know because you call us weak yet you talk shit to someone FROM THE SAFETY OF A MOVING VEHICLE. How is that NOT weak? If I have an issue with someone I take it up with them face to face like it should be done, not like some idiot who's too scared to do it alone. Afraid you'd get punched out by a 12 year old?

If I had been walking down the street my reaction would have been much the same. However, I didn't want to slam on the breaks of a 20 ft U-Haul in the middle of traffic, and cause an accident, just so I could personally shake his hand before I told him what I thought about his shirt. I had to do it quickly and succinctly.

Sorry, I come across communists and apologists for Jihadists all the time and have no problem telling them what I think face to face. In fact, last month I was in a convenience store where the BBC was playing a segment on the Bolivian president's nationalization of U.S. oil company's extraction and processing infrastructure in that country. I told the cashier that they should repeal executive order 12333 and go after Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales. The cashier responded that they should get Bush instead. I proceeded to argue with him. Throughout the process I found out he was a Libyan national who believed in the "Protocols of the Elder States of Zion". Throughout this argument, it was also my position that the United States should not let people like him into the country, because they are hostile to modernity, western culture, and the America. In addition, I told him that I didn't think it was a good idea to allow people to immigrate who hold allegiances to countries whose states are also hostile to those things. The guy actually agreed with me, which I find quite odd. I contended that our country was superior because he and I could stand there and disagree on these issues and criticize the government. He disagreed on that point using the typical leftist ramblings that America has a nasty habit of interferring with foreign government's when it was in it's interest. I asked him why we shouldn't, and his response was that it breeds terrorism. Quite possibly, I was probably talking to an Islamic sleeper agent. I don't know this for a fact, but he sure made many of the same arguments that I would expect out of "Azzam the American". Am I the only one that is troubled that we have people like this in our country? Am I the only one assuming that this wave of Mexican illegals might actually have similar goals to the Jihadists? Am I the only person that would actually debate these very things with these people? No, you are quite wrong about me. I am outspoken in any medium. You should be able to tell that by my personality here. Perhaps you are right. One day, it might get me killed.

Copyright 2006

[RevSouth]

I checked out yor link, and would like to show the other members some of the xenophobic, blindly nationalistic shit you are promoting.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaomil600.jpg

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-closed.gif

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaogun600.jpg

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-coulter.jpg

Whats with the fucking cult of personality around Reagan? He lied to the public, sold arms to Iran and funded terrorism.
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/rect-reagan.jpg

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-ropeback.gif

Ooh, look, a racist one, too.
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-forecast-back.gif

[Zero]

"8. No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey."

I loled XD

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by General [email protected] 31 2006, 01:39 AM
I drove by this 12 or 13 year old kid wearing a Che T-shirt. Would it have been wrong to stick my hand out the window as I drove by hoping to smack some sense into him? I thought that that might get me into trouble, so I simply yelled to him, "nice shirt, idiot." I could tell by the look on his face that he felt like a moron. Hopefully, he will never wear that disgraceful garbage in my country ever again, as a result of my outspoken nature. Who knows, maybe I saved him the embarrassment and humiliation of becoming an actual communist. I certainly hope so. What do you think? Should I have left him well enough alone, or should I have envoked my first amendment right to ridicule someone for using theirs in an effort to promote communism? If I had a kid that wore that crap, I'd ground him until he was 18 or make him read the Constitition of the United States of America and the Federalist Papers until he understood the error of his ways. Some parents are completely AWOL when it comes to promoting good sense. Had I seen his parents walking down the street with him, I most definitely would have stuck my hand out the window hoping to smack one of them.

This raises the questions for the toy-commies on this website. What kind of parenting styles do your parents use? Are they okay with you being communists? I, myself, would be tempted to turn my kids over to the state if they held your views, because they would be advocating state involvement in their upbringing. Why not give them what they want?

I am so sick of these snot nose kids wearing this crap. Therefore, I am going to buy an anti-Che T-Shirt. For my capitalist buddies, here is the link if you are interested:

Communism Killed 100 Million People and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt (http://www.thoseshirts.com/lousy.html)

Copyright 2006
I would have been almost tempted to smack him one. Self-respecting capitalists should not produce that garbage. You exhibited appropriate self-restraint in a difficult situation. I commend you.

[General Patton]

I would have been almost tempted to smack him one. Self-respecting capitalists should not produce that garbage. You exhibited appropriate self-restraint in a difficult situation. I commend you.

Why thank you Ebeneezer. I thought so, too.

[theraven]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 05:59 AM
I checked out yor link, and would like to show the other members some of the xenophobic, blindly nationalistic shit you are promoting.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaomil600.jpg


IMAO is a joke site, the slogains are humous.


http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-closed.gif

whats wrong with that?


http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaogun600.jpg

again an imao joke


http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-coulter.jpg

belh stupid


Whats with the fucking cult of personality around Reagan? He lied to the public, sold arms to Iran and funded terrorism.
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/rect-reagan.jpg

thier making fun of your cult of personaltiy visa vis che


http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-ropeback.gif

again funny


Ooh, look, a racist one, too.
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-forecast-back.gif

whats racist?

[BurnTheOliveTree]

Raven, shit, look again. Perhaps racist is the wrong word, but that is a truly disgusting attempt at humour. Admit that much?

-Alex

[Rollo]

So you're syaing it's ok for everybody in the USA now to be there because they were illegal immigrants hundreds of years ago instead of now?

[General Patton]

Wrong again, commie. Prior periods of immigration were done legally, immigrants were checked for disease, and were assimilated into our culture through the public school system. In fact, public schools were created to help socialize younger generations of immigrants to incorporate American ideology, traditions, and historical persespectives within their own value system. Really, quite different than today. We also enforced limitations on the number of immigrants that we allowed into our country, in order to avoid a demographic meltdown and a complete Balkanization of the United States.

[somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 08:04 AM


http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-closed.gif

whats wrong with that?
For your information, it basically says "immigrants stay out".

[which doctor]

General Patton, are you even going to respond to any of my points or is debating above your head?

http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php...st&p=1292129174 (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=53528&view=findpost&p=1292129174)

[OneBrickOneVoice]

Originally posted by General [email protected] 31 2006, 01:39 AM
I drove by this 12 or 13 year old kid wearing a Che T-shirt. Would it have been wrong to stick my hand out the window as I drove by hoping to smack some sense into him? I thought that that might get me into trouble, so I simply yelled to him, "nice shirt, idiot." I could tell by the look on his face that he felt like a moron. Hopefully, he will never wear that disgraceful garbage in my country ever again, as a result of my outspoken nature. Who knows, maybe I saved him the embarrassment and humiliation of becoming an actual communist. I certainly hope so. What do you think? Should I have left him well enough alone, or should I have envoked my first amendment right to ridicule someone for using theirs in an effort to promote communism? If I had a kid that wore that crap, I'd ground him until he was 18 or make him read the Constitition of the United States of America and the Federalist Papers until he understood the error of his ways. Some parents are completely AWOL when it comes to promoting good sense. Had I seen his parents walking down the street with him, I most definitely would have stuck my hand out the window hoping to smack one of them.

This raises the questions for the toy-commies on this website. What kind of parenting styles do your parents use? Are they okay with you being communists? I, myself, would be tempted to turn my kids over to the state if they held your views, because they would be advocating state involvement in their upbringing. Why not give them what they want?

I am so sick of these snot nose kids wearing this crap. Therefore, I am going to buy an anti-Che T-Shirt. For my capitalist buddies, here is the link if you are interested:

Communism Killed 100 Million People and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt (http://www.thoseshirts.com/lousy.html)

Copyright 2006
Wow your a douche. Way to call a someone probably half your age an idiot and feel good about it. BTW you obviously don't know shit about communism, why don't you go find some little dems-rep forum where you can talk all the garbage you feel like.

[Free Left]

This raises the questions for the toy-commies on this website. What kind of parenting styles do your parents use? Are they okay with you being communists?

Well, my parents must have done something right if I became a leftist but your mother must have smoked crack and drank vodka while she was pregnant for you to turn out the way you are. :mellow:



I, myself, would be tempted to turn my kids over to the state if they held your views, because they would be advocating state involvement in their upbringing. Why not give them what they want?

Same reason the world did not give Hitler what he wanted...

[Chicken of Bristol]

You insulted a 12 year old? You deserve one of these:

http://www.ctgilles.net/images/pictars/assclown.jpg

[Qwerty Dvorak]

Hey you guys better not cross him, or he might shout an insult at YOU from his car and drive off straight away.

[Free Left]

Hey you guys better not cross him, or he might shout an insult at YOU from his car and drive off straight away.

OMG! No! If that happened to me I'd immediately shun my lefty ways and sign up to the nearest Redneck/Republican convention..... :P :lol:

[Rollo]

No guys seriously, this is a funny matter. Or is it a seriously funny matter? Either way the guy's an idiot. Why do they man all these guards at the mexican border when you can easily run to the USA from canada? Most people living in the USA now are descendants of illegal immigrants or slaves of illegal immigrants, and they say having a country based on convicts was crazy.

[-Red_Star-]

the mecca one is very offensive!
this type of humor could only entertain people like the KKK

[somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback]

Guess who got banned?

[Janus]

Oh come on, the kid could've been wearing that shirt because he admired Che's medical ability. :P

[Zero]

Heh, owned. I <3 teh admins.

[MichaelCollins]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 06:16 PM
No guys seriously, this is a funny matter. Or is it a seriously funny matter? Either way the guy&#39;s an idiot. Why do they man all these guards at the mexican border when you can easily run to the USA from canada? Most people living in the USA now are descendants of illegal immigrants or slaves of illegal immigrants, and they say having a country based on convicts was crazy.
There was no State to form laws to restrict immigration when my ancestors came to America. Immigration presupposes crossing a border. There was none. Legal vs illegal presupposes a law. There was none.

Conqurors? yes. Imperialists? yes. Colonists? yes. "Illegal Immigrants?" no.

Now there is a State with borders and laws. legal vs. illegal and "immigrant" are now valid terms. do they count for much? not really. is it different than pligrims v. indians? yes -- at least in practical terms, if not moral.

[MichaelCollins]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 07:12 PM
Oh come on, the kid could&#39;ve been wearing that shirt because he admired Che&#39;s medical ability. :P
I would venture to state that the vast majority of people who wear Che paraphenalia have little to no clue about who or what he was, what he stood for, or what he did and where. They just know that its "cool" to sport his image on &#036;25 t-shirts at the temple of capitalism (aka the mall).

[Janus]

I would venture to state that the vast majority of people who wear Che paraphenalia have little to no clue about who or what he was, what he stood for, or what he did and where
Yeah, that&#39;s the sad thing: how Che&#39;s image has been so commercialized by the very same institution that he stood against.

[bezdomni]

Just so you know, if you&#39;d have said that kind of shit to me you&#39;d be lucky to have any teeth left.

OI people get stupider by the day. I feel bad that this is all your "movement" has to offer as far as argumentation goes.

The people in the United States should rise up, kill the politicians and convert the masses to revolutionary communism.

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 09:16 PM
Just so you know, if you&#39;d have said that kind of shit to me you&#39;d be lucky to have any teeth left.

OI people get stupider by the day. I feel bad that this is all your "movement" has to offer as far as argumentation goes.

The people in the United States should rise up, kill the politicians and convert the masses to revolutionary communism.
Our movement grows stronger by the second. Yours wanes. You cannot destroy us because we follow the forces of evolutionary greed. As such, we do the most good.

And all your movement can offer is violence. I do not appreciate this aspect and Im not sure others can either. Greed and glorious capitalism will always be here.

[Free Left]

Our movement grows stronger by the second. Yours wanes.

I would disagree. As your system continues to widen the gap between the elite rich and the (ever more) poor, a revolution is bound to happen.


And all your movement can offer is violence

How? Why would we want violence

[BurnTheOliveTree]

Ebeneezer - I&#39;m decided now, you&#39;re clearly a social darwinist. Admit it. You keep falling back on the whole selfish gene idea, as a kind of overriding proof that you&#39;re correct.

-Alex

[ebeneezer]

Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2006, 09:28 AM
Ebeneezer - I&#39;m decided now, you&#39;re clearly a social darwinist. Admit it. You keep falling back on the whole selfish gene idea, as a kind of overriding proof that you&#39;re correct.

-Alex
Yes I am a social darwinist. And YOU are a social-darwinophobe.

[red team]

Our movement grows stronger by the second. Yours wanes. You cannot destroy us because we follow the forces of evolutionary greed. As such, we do the most good.

And all your movement can offer is violence. I do not appreciate this aspect and Im not sure others can either. Greed and glorious capitalism will always be here.


Nah&#33; We&#39;re just building up our forces...

Why settle for one country when you can have the whole world&#33;

[red team]

Yes I am a social darwinist. And YOU are a social-darwinophobe.

Dumb, dumb, dumb...

Genetic evolution has become insignificant ever since people started developing technology, that is ever since fire was discovered genetic heredity has become an increasingly insignificant factor in the evolution of human society. It&#39;s ideas that matters now.

[red team]

Aaaugh&#33; You&#39;ve spotted my H.Q. where I plot world domination&#33; Gotta move my mobile command center&#33;

[theraven]

Originally posted by s3rna+Jul 31 2006, 03:58 PM--> (s3rna @ Jul 31 2006, 03:58 PM)
[email protected] 31 2006, 08:04 AM


http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/square-large-closed.gif

whats wrong with that?
For your information, it basically says "immigrants stay out". [/b]
i got that so what?

[theraven]

Originally posted by [email protected] 31 2006, 08:18 AM
Raven, shit, look again. Perhaps racist is the wrong word, but that is a truly disgusting attempt at humour. Admit that much?

-Alex
its not nice..but so?

[theraven]

Originally posted by &#045;Red_Star&#045;@Jul 31 2006, 06:59 PM
the mecca one is very offensive&#33;
this type of humor could only entertain people like the KKK
why? whats wrong with it?


So you&#39;re syaing it&#39;s ok for everybody in the USA now to be there because they were illegal immigrants hundreds of years ago instead of now?

yep.