View Full Version : I Feel Bad...
RevSouth
23rd July 2006, 06:10
Almost makes you wish you were lifestylism.
http://www.ecofoot.org/
loveme4whoiam
23rd July 2006, 19:35
Originally posted by My Results
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2 PLANETS.
Oh, now that's just harsh :P However, to put that into perspective I got 3.6 hectares, whereas the UK average is 5.6 :lol: I wonder how many planets the UK requires?
Wanted Man
23rd July 2006, 19:59
Doing better than the rest of my country, apparently:
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.7
MOBILITY 0
SHELTER 0.6
GOODS/SERVICES 0.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 2.9
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 4.8 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.6 PLANETS.
Whitten
23rd July 2006, 21:14
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.8
MOBILITY 0.2
SHELTER 0.4
GOODS/SERVICES 0.5
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 2.9
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.6 PLANETS.
Could be worse, if I started eating properly I may even get that down to average.
che's long lost daughter
24th July 2006, 15:13
I live on a third world country and I expected that I would get very low results...I am totally aghast with the results I saw..it makes me sad :(
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 0.6
MOBILITY 0.7
SHELTER 0.3
GOODS/SERVICES 1.3
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 2.9
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 1.2 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.6 PLANETS.
Whitten
24th July 2006, 16:00
How can you speand that much on mobility + goods and services?
che's long lost daughter
24th July 2006, 16:15
Is that question for me? I didn't realise I was spending that much. I know I don't spend too much. With mobility, I work 5 days a week and I have to take 3 rides to reach the hospital I work in, I guess that explains why. With goods and services, I don't know why it got that high... :unsure:
*edited typos
somebodywhowantedtoleaveandnotcomeback
24th July 2006, 16:54
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.6
MOBILITY 0
SHELTER 0.8
GOODS/SERVICES 0.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 6.7 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.7 PLANETS.
Hmm...
Lord Testicles
24th July 2006, 17:17
FOOD 0.7
MOBILITY 0.2
SHELTER 0.4
GOODS/SERVICES 0.3
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 1.6
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.
Freigemachten
24th July 2006, 17:32
Wow, my footprint is 11, thats half the national average but still, christ, we'd need 2.5 planets partly cuz my town has no public transportation. thats not true, we have one bus that runs from here to the nearest major city twice a day. Any way, that thing makes you wanna reevaluate some stuff.
FriedFrog
24th July 2006, 17:44
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.5
MOBILITY 0.3
SHELTER 0.7
GOODS/SERVICES 0.8
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3.3
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.8 PLANETS.
-----------------
Not bad, but not great. I eat lots of animal products.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.