Log in

View Full Version : New Direct Action Organization



lovebombanarchy
21st July 2006, 22:09
Recently, a group of friends and I embarked on a campaign of charitable shoplifting somewhere in the Southern United States. We decided to share the ideas and principles which inspired our campaign, in hopes that they would inspire others across the world to begin their own campaigns of charitable shoplifting. While these ideas certainly aren’t original, we hope that they will be useful.

(the information posted here can also be found at www.myspace.com/charitableshoplifters )

Charitable Shoplifting Front
why shoplift?
Shoplifting from large corporations is easiest means of organically redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor. Shoplifting is both an easy way of punishing corporations that deliberately destroy the environment, exploit and abuse laborers, and destroy communities and local culture, and an effective way of acquiring resources to give to the impoverished victims of capitalist oppression.

If you don’t think that it is fair that billions of people live in crippling poverty so that a tiny elite can live in unimaginable luxury; if you’re tired of waiting for government bureaucracy to solve the problem; if you want to wage class warfare and don’t want to wait for your fellow humans to wake up and “join the revolution” to start doing the right thing; you can make a concrete difference today at very low risk to your personal freedom, by taking from the rich and giving to the poor!

But doesn’t shoplifting just hurt workers?
No. Workers are almost always paid by the hour that they work, not by the number of their products that are sold. By the time a product reaches a store, the workers who created it have, in all likelihood, has already been paid. The vast majority of workers are already being paid the minimum wage anyway, so there’s no way that the corporation could legally transfer the cost of stolen merchandise to workers. The only people who really stand to lose much money are the multibillionaire corporate elites.
(for more, read Why I love Shoplifting From Big Corporations by CrimethInc.) http://www.crimethinc.com/library/english/shoplifting.html

how?
While the simple technique of just putting desired merchandise in your pocket or shoe and walking out of the store is usually very successful, some shoplifters prefer more complex schemes. Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoplifting#Common_Shoplifting_Scams ) has a list of various techniques which have proved effective. Some highlights include:

"Accidental" Stealing is when a thief takes their place in the queue with the items they intend to steal, and pay for only one of those items while holding what they want to steal in full view to cause confusion (or place said items into their pockets) but avoid suspicion due to their apparent intention of payment. If the unlikely event of being caught, the thief could simply pass off the attempt at stealing as accidental.

Self-checkout Scam: At some larger retailers, such as Wal-Mart, customers have the option of using self-checkout lanes, in which customers do not interact with employees at all when making purchases but check themselves out at a computer. Customers are expected to scan the items that they wish to purchase, insert payment for the scanned items, then bag the items and leave the store. Shoplifters have been known to purchase small items with these machines, and place additional items in their bags without paying for them. Many shoplifters intentionally act slightly confused when using these machines, and act as if they are attempting to scan the item which they wish to steal, so that, if confronted, they can claim that they took the additional items by mistake.

Grab and Run: A common shoplifting technique is known by the Loss Prevention community as a "grab and run." Simply put, a shoplifter enters a retail establishment usually with prior knowledge of what they are looking for. The shoplifter moves very quickly toward the merchandise they wish to steal. Once the shoplifter has found the merchandise they proceed to the nearest store exit, usually running. Due to the short time that shoplifter is inside the store persons who attempt this scam are rarely caught, or in some cases even detected. Less common is for a group of people to rush a store and grab as much merchandise as possible and then rush out. The speed with which this happens and the large numbers of people involved make it difficult to stop.

requirements
For an action to be endorsed by the CSLF, it must conform to a certain set of guidelines:
1. Items shoplifted must be taken from corporate chains ONLY. NEVER shoplift from independently owned businesses.
2. Items must be given to poor and disadvantaged individuals. If you yourself are poor, then we support your effort to shoplift items necessary to your own wellbeing (however, it’s always good to share!) If you’re rich, then you need to give your loot back to people who are poor and really need it.
3. Don’t be violent. There’s no absolutely no need to be.
4. Items shoplifted must be either life necessities—food, clothes, medicine, water, material to build shelter, etc—or items related to promoting political, artistic, or scientific progress (for instance, we support efforts to shoplift book from Barnes & Nobles to give to local libraries). There is an exception to this rule. If you take an expensive luxury item, sell it, and use the money for charitable purposes, we will endorse your action.

safety
Some suggestions on how to avoid getting caught.
1. Know your escape. When you shoplift, you should always have a plan for action if you are caught, whether that plan is to run, or to laugh and claim that don’t know how to use the automatic checkout machines and you’re sorry for your mistake.
2. Make sure that you are knowledgeable about applicable laws regarding “theft” and shoplifting in your state, as well as the policies of specific retailers. You can probably find this by searching google. It should be noted that Wal-Mart, the biggest corporation in the world, has a policy of NOT taking legal action against shoplifters caught with merchandise worth less than $25, provided the shoplifter does not threaten violence and is carrying ID. (http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20060716140827194 )
3. NEVER shoplift in front of surveillance cameras or other shoppers. These other shoppers may snitch on you, or, they could be undercover employees known as “loss prevention agents” whose job it is to find and punish shoplifters.
4. Don’t take unnecessary risks. Make sure that you are not carrying illegal substances or evidence of other criminal activity when you shoplift. There is some degree of legal risk involved in shoplifting, and a slightly larger than normal chance that you may get into trouble with law enforcement, so it is not wise to risk conviction for additional “crimes” in addition to that of shoplifting.
5. Don’t keep large stores of stolen goods for longer than necessary. Redistribute goods as quickly as possible.

cbm989
22nd July 2006, 00:16
Good stuff here. I practiced what i like to call the 'art' of stealing for a little bit. It was misguided however, as the profits were distrubited among my friends and I. We did it mainly because a) desperation, both from single parent families, little money, etc. b) only hit up rich neighborhoods. But this seems like a much better idea, whereas my motives were mostly greed, these are interesting and i may try it some. Who do you give it to when you distribute it? Oh and i find stealing from residences much easier than from commercial centers. for example, we would do 'garage raiding' basicly looking for people who left their garages open (at about 2 am) and taking whatever was in there, or in their cars. So, if you want a less chance of being caught, but less options on what you can take i suggest that route. its quite easy.

lovebombanarchy
22nd July 2006, 00:55
its up to you to decide who to give your loot to... homeless people, people just down on their luck, whatever...shoplift a bunch of stuff and take it down to mexico, whatever you want.

which doctor
22nd July 2006, 02:18
Originally posted by [email protected] 21 2006, 02:10 PM
Self-checkout Scam: At some larger retailers, such as Wal-Mart, customers have the option of using self-checkout lanes, in which customers do not interact with employees at all when making purchases but check themselves out at a computer. Customers are expected to scan the items that they wish to purchase, insert payment for the scanned items, then bag the items and leave the store. Shoplifters have been known to purchase small items with these machines, and place additional items in their bags without paying for them. Many shoplifters intentionally act slightly confused when using these machines, and act as if they are attempting to scan the item which they wish to steal, so that, if confronted, they can claim that they took the additional items by mistake.

That's a great idea. I've never thought of that before.

Thanks!

lovebombanarchy
22nd July 2006, 04:40
Originally posted by Fist of Blood+Jul 21 2006, 11:19 PM--> (Fist of Blood @ Jul 21 2006, 11:19 PM)
[email protected] 21 2006, 02:10 PM
Self-checkout Scam: At some larger retailers, such as Wal-Mart, customers have the option of using self-checkout lanes, in which customers do not interact with employees at all when making purchases but check themselves out at a computer. Customers are expected to scan the items that they wish to purchase, insert payment for the scanned items, then bag the items and leave the store. Shoplifters have been known to purchase small items with these machines, and place additional items in their bags without paying for them. Many shoplifters intentionally act slightly confused when using these machines, and act as if they are attempting to scan the item which they wish to steal, so that, if confronted, they can claim that they took the additional items by mistake.

That's a great idea. I've never thought of that before.

Thanks! [/b]
thanks... i actually added that one to wikipedia..

just be careful about one thing. if you put something too heavy in the bag, the machine might say something like "unexpected item found in bag." best to pick up the bag and then put your stolen items in.

cbm989
22nd July 2006, 07:31
well i have to wonder..is it wrong to shoplift solely for yourself? Is that just another form of greed or would it classify as wealth dsitribution, seeing as I (the poorer party) is taking from the corporation (the overly-wealthy party)?

which doctor
22nd July 2006, 07:36
Originally posted by [email protected] 21 2006, 11:32 PM
well i have to wonder..is it wrong to shoplift solely for yourself? Is that just another form of greed or would it classify as wealth dsitribution, seeing as I (the poorer party) is taking from the corporation (the overly-wealthy party)?
It all depends what you are stealing. In your case, if you weren't stealing luxury goods, than it would be a-okay.

Ricardo
22nd July 2006, 08:01
I would say it's not wrong if you're stealing from a corporation and giving it to yourself, because at least you are taking from a corporation, but if you really don't need what you're stealing, you might as well give it to someone poorer than you.

RaiseYourVoice
22nd July 2006, 11:24
well the problem is, were do you think they cut the costs for these actions? right, they cut down on employees working there. the company itself doesnt loose anything, they pass the additional cost on

Solidarnosc
22nd July 2006, 16:27
Fuck building a revolutionary movement, we can just destroy the system by petty crime!

Er, no.

This is NOT the Middle Ages.
You are NOT Robin Hood.
And this is NOT progressive. It is fuckwitted.




Anytime liberalism rears it's ugly head...

RebelOutcast
22nd July 2006, 16:38
Solidarnosc, could you please point out where he suggested his method over a proletarian revolution?
The answer is he didn't, the idea I believe is to provide relief to those in need by "liberating" items from corporate chains.
This is certainly not the first time I've heard this idea, although I have to say, building a movement around it is not really a good idea, acting on your own, or in a small group is the best way as this doesn't cause the shop to increase security measures.
So Solidarnosc, what is your real objection to this concept?

Solidarnosc
22nd July 2006, 17:48
My real objection to this concept is that it replaces revolutonary activity with pseudo-radical social work. Which is what it is.

Now, don't get me wrong, I couldn't give a crap about corporate profits or 'stock leakage'. If people steal from corporations, it's no skin off my teeth. But what is the point? If you want to alleivate the alienation of captialism for the poor, then get involved in building unions, act against corporations which don't pay minimum, or indeed, living wages. Get involved in strikes and agitate for a rank & file victory.

Such politically glorified social work dressed up in a Robin Hood garb doesn't actually do anything for anyone. A unionisation drive in today's retail sweatshops like Walmart or Tesco does much more to make sure that people don't have to steal in order to survive in the first place.

Random acts of petty crime a revolution does not make.

RebelOutcast
22nd July 2006, 20:19
Originally posted by [email protected] 22 2006, 02:49 PM
Random acts of petty crime a revolution does not make.
And no one said they did, there was never a suggestion of this replacing the "usual" revolutionary methods.

lovebombanarchy
22nd July 2006, 21:00
"well the problem is, were do you think they cut the costs for these actions? right, they cut down on employees working there. the company itself doesnt loose anything, they pass the additional cost on "

see this:
"But doesn’t shoplifting just hurt workers?
No. Workers are almost always paid by the hour that they work, not by the number of their products that are sold. By the time a product reaches a store, the workers who created it have, in all likelihood, has already been paid. The vast majority of workers are already being paid the minimum wage anyway, so there’s no way that the corporation could legally transfer the cost of stolen merchandise to workers. The only people who really stand to lose much money are the multibillionaire corporate elites."


as to your complaint about this sort of project not being revolutionary... i really don't see why both such projects can't coexist... it just frustrates me when more orthodox revolutionaries than me spend all their time talking about what's going to happen when "the revolution" comes, and never take time to fight the class war in the here and now. it's a lot like religious people who promise the poor "pie int he sky when they die" to quote a famous labor song...

anyway, I salute you if you truly are involved in union organizing and the like... but too many radicals aren't really involved in anything, and are just waiting for the revolution. here is something easy you can do to make a concrete difference until it comes.

Solidarnosc
22nd July 2006, 21:18
Originally posted by [email protected] 22 2006, 06:01 PM
as to your complaint about this sort of project not being revolutionary... i really don't see why both such projects can't coexist... it just frustrates me when more orthodox revolutionaries than me spend all their time talking about what's going to happen when "the revolution" comes, and never take time to fight the class war in the here and now. it's a lot like religious people who promise the poor "pie int he sky when they die" to quote a famous labor song...

anyway, I salute you if you truly are involved in union organizing and the like... but too many radicals aren't really involved in anything, and are just waiting for the revolution. here is something easy you can do to make a concrete difference until it comes.
Certainly this 'orthodox' revolutionary (as opposed to what? The psudo liberal reformist petty crime you propose?) doesn't just talk about revolution being something far off. It's something that revolutionaries build in their day to day lives, whether it be recruiting my fellow call centre workers to the Communication Workers Union, or by selling (or even giving away) a revolutionary newspaper to someone, or by getting up on their theory, to working on an anti-deportation campaign, to building a revolutionary party or organsiation.

Whereas, if you just go around and steal things to give to the deserving poor, then you relegate the role of people to a subordinate one, there to gratefully recieve your kind gifts while you go about liberating them. It's snobbish middle class liberalism in place of working class self-empancipation.

It's social work. And the working class will not be emancipated by social workers.

bcbm
22nd July 2006, 22:54
Solidarnosc, the things you say are not mutually exclusive. I can build unions and steal. Theft from the rich has been part of revolutionary practice for over a century, so I don't see why we're bothering to hold discussions on it still.

lovebombanarchy
22nd July 2006, 22:55
Originally posted by Solidarnosc+Jul 22 2006, 06:19 PM--> (Solidarnosc @ Jul 22 2006, 06:19 PM)
[email protected] 22 2006, 06:01 PM
as to your complaint about this sort of project not being revolutionary... i really don't see why both such projects can't coexist... it just frustrates me when more orthodox revolutionaries than me spend all their time talking about what's going to happen when "the revolution" comes, and never take time to fight the class war in the here and now. it's a lot like religious people who promise the poor "pie int he sky when they die" to quote a famous labor song...

anyway, I salute you if you truly are involved in union organizing and the like... but too many radicals aren't really involved in anything, and are just waiting for the revolution. here is something easy you can do to make a concrete difference until it comes.
Certainly this 'orthodox' revolutionary (as opposed to what? The psudo liberal reformist petty crime you propose?) doesn't just talk about revolution being something far off. It's something that revolutionaries build in their day to day lives, whether it be recruiting my fellow call centre workers to the Communication Workers Union, or by selling (or even giving away) a revolutionary newspaper to someone, or by getting up on their theory, to working on an anti-deportation campaign, to building a revolutionary party or organsiation.

Whereas, if you just go around and steal things to give to the deserving poor, then you relegate the role of people to a subordinate one, there to gratefully recieve your kind gifts while you go about liberating them. It's snobbish middle class liberalism in place of working class self-empancipation.

It's social work. And the working class will not be emancipated by social workers. [/b]
well, i dont consider expropriation a reformist tactic (after all, expropriation is at the heart of the marxist revolutionary project which you no doubt support, and a large component of the anarchist revolutionary project which I am more interested in) but you can call it whatever you want, it's getting vital goods in the hands of people who desperately need these goods, while at the same time harming the corporations we all agree are destroying the earth. while i admire your efforts to organize workers, i think we have to be realistic and admit that, at the current rate, its going to be a long, long time before we actually see a signifigant drop in inequality because of actions taken by unions etc. it's hard for oppressed people in our society to commit a great deal of time to these causes which promise salvation in the future, because they carry immediate risks with no immediate benefits. most oppressed people, i have found, would rather ease their immediate suffering, so they indulge in drugs, alcohol, consumerism, etc. expropriation can allieviate immediate ills, while simultaneously offering hope for a completely liberated future.

and like the prevoius poster said, the two tactics can be used to complement each other. are there striking workers in your town who are holding out for a deal, but who need basic supplies because they havent been getting their paycheck? steal it for them, so they wont have to break their strike (or, if you're the one on strike, steal the stuff for yourself and your comrades!)

need some paper for your revolutionary newspaper? you know how to get that too.

im not proposing a radical new strategy for revolution. just suggesting that we pay more attention to a good tactic that has been overlooked.


"It's snobbish middle class liberalism in place of working class self-empancipation. "

no its not. this campaign is more about getting poor people to start taking what they need for themselves, it isnt about subordinating the poor. i think that the best way to share our ideas about expropriatoin is by acting on these ideas. this is largely because im an anarchist and believe in a praxis of theory and action.
if i see someone in need, shoplift something for them, then tell them how i got it, explain the political philosophy which inspired my action, and encourage them to take what they need in the future in a similar fashion, there's nothing snobbish about that, anymore than its snobbish for a person from the middle class to encourage a worker to find a union.