Log in

View Full Version : Rival Chávez Factions Resort To Deadly Force



Nachie
17th July 2006, 17:06
This is pretty interesting because I actually met with Jose Pinto back in March. Please note though that this article is from the ultra-right Miami Herald.

-----------------------------------------

Rival Chávez factions resort to deadly force

Internal, violent fighting among supporters of President Hugo Chávez is putting the government in an awkward position.

BY STEVEN DUDLEY
[email protected]

Cracks are becoming fissures in Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez's self-declared revolution, as armed groups of leftist supporters clashed in recent weeks in a rough and poor barrio in skirmishes that left at least four dead.

The gunfights are the first between Chávez supporters in public and seem to illustrate the rough scramble over the benefits from Chávez's oil-fueled government as well as bitter jealousies among leaders of Chavista groups.

''Wherever you go in this country, you'll find a [poor neighborhood] . . . where there are internal fights,'' said Alberto Garrido, a longtime Chávez watcher and author of several books on the man and his ideology.

The fighting has put the government in a quandary because it has been arming civilian militias and other groups as part of its plan to defend itself against what it says is a possible U.S. invasion -- something that Washington has repeatedly denied. Now Chávez has to decide how to deal with rogue groups that support him but may be getting out of hand.

Tensions between pro-Chávez organizations in the January 23rd neighborhood, a poor Caracas barrio of about one million people, have been simmering for months but bubbled to the surface June 21 when gunmen killed the son of a prominent community leader, Valentín Santana, after they played soccer. Santana allegedly responded by sending his own gunmen to kill two members of a rival neighborhood.

NO END IN SIGHT

Police said they are searching for Santana and others, and authorities have called for a dialogue among all the factions before more violence erupts. But the groups -- many of which call themselves Tupamaros after Uruguay's 1970s leftist Tupamaro guerrillas -- seem bent on continuing their vendettas.

Chávez, elected in 1998, owes part of his staying power to such radical groups as the Tupamaros and their activities in poor neighborhoods like January 23rd, which has been at the heart of his socialist government's literacy and health programs that have helped him maintain high approval ratings.

The neighborhood also has long been a crime-ridden and volatile place. It was where remnants of Uruguay's Tupamaro guerrillas, crushed by a military dictatorship, took refuge in the 1970s and began sowing the seeds of vigilante groups that use the same name. Some of those groups drove out delinquents, while others slid into crime themselves.

Today, there are at least four groups using the Tupamaro title, and dozens more that sprung from the early groups. All support Chávez, but they also follow leaders who control city blocks and individual buildings in the barrio's 1950s public housing complex. The neighborhood was named after the date in 1958 when dictator Gen. Marcos Pérez Jiménez was toppled.

Some Tupamaros maintain their vigilante role and run government literacy and after-school programs, while others engage in criminal activities. But all are armed and seem to have benefited financially and socially from Chávez's rise to power. Some have government jobs, while others are living off the leftovers from the government's increased social spending.

Several of the January 23rd neighborhood leaders interviewed by The Miami Herald said one of the main sources of trouble has been José Pinto, the head of the Revolutionary Tuparmaro Movement, who according to local media reports may have sent the gunman to kill Santana's son.

Pinto could not be reached for comment by The Miami Herald, but he has denied the reports to the local media. A former ally, Alberto Carias, has said the attacks on Pinto are unfair and alleged that Chávez opponents had infiltrated the Tupamaros to cause discord.

DEATH THREAT

This is not the first outbreak violence among Chavistas. Lina Ron, a prominent Chávez supporter with her own armed group, complained recently that Carias was threatening to kill her. She did not say why.

Carias denied Ron's accusation and now seems to be helping the government scramble to shore up the differences between the Tupamaro factions before more bloodshed occurs.

However, threats of renewed fighting loom daily, and leaders of some of the factions say they are scuttling from safe house to safe house.

''They've created monsters,'' said Lisandro Pérez, a leader of the Tupamaro Popular Resistance Front, referring to the myriad pro-Chávez vigilante groups. ``And now these monsters are eating them.''

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/...herald_americas (http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/americas/15050581.htm?source=rss&channel=miamiherald_americas)

Karl Marx's Camel
17th July 2006, 17:08
Revolutionary Tuparmaro Movement?

Nachie
17th July 2006, 17:59
MRT

I interviewed their president in this pamphlet (http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=3378).

violencia.Proletariat
17th July 2006, 18:46
This sounds a lot like when those Chavez supporters fired on the anti-chavez marches in 2002. Shooting at an empty street ;)

bcbm
17th July 2006, 20:39
Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2006, 09:47 AM
Shooting at an empty street ;)
...

PRIMITIVISTS!!




(They were shooting up, at snipers.)

Marion
17th July 2006, 21:54
Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2006, 03:00 PM
MRT

I interviewed their president in this pamphlet (http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=3378).
...and a quality pamphlet it is too (have already linked to it on this site in the last few days and posted it to some mates). Best bit of writing I've read in ages - plus it killed about three hours at work!

Janus
17th July 2006, 22:33
So, this is basically similar to a gang war where they're fighting over resources and power?

Nachie
17th July 2006, 22:43
Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2006, 06:55 PM
...and a quality pamphlet it is too (have already linked to it on this site in the last few days and posted it to some mates). Best bit of writing I've read in ages - plus it killed about three hours at work!
awww, shucks :blush:

That essay has caused a ton of new interest in the organization that produced it, and we're actually kinda swamped with correspondence right now... I hope that it leads to some interesting stuff in the future.

Glad you liked it + it helped distract from work! ;)

Karl Marx's Camel
17th July 2006, 23:22
Isn't the MRT a terrorist organization..?

bcbm
18th July 2006, 00:23
Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2006, 02:23 PM
Isn't the MRT a terrorist organization..?
Used to be. They were the Urban Guerrilla model in the 70's (inspiring comrades all over the world: Tupamaros-West Berlin, anyone?) but after being effectively wiped out by state repression, they've entered politics proper.

Marion
18th July 2006, 00:40
Originally posted by black banner black gun+Jul 17 2006, 09:24 PM--> (black banner black gun @ Jul 17 2006, 09:24 PM)
[email protected] 17 2006, 02:23 PM
Isn't the MRT a terrorist organization..?
Used to be. They were the Urban Guerrilla model in the 70's (inspiring comrades all over the world: Tupamaros-West Berlin, anyone?) but after being effectively wiped out by state repression, they've entered politics proper.[/b]
Tupamaros West Berlin? Only read about them through Bommi Baumann's book and read some stuff on the net about one of their actions being pretty anti-semitic - I think some members bombed a Jewish site on the anniversary of Kristallnacht but other members were not happy about the act at all. You read the Baumann book?

Nothing Human Is Alien
18th July 2006, 00:46
We all know about the MRT, but who are the 'Tupamaro Popular Resistance Front' ? Sounds fishy.

Severian
18th July 2006, 08:11
This is a neat example of why groups or factions claiming to be revolutionary shouldn't use violence to settle their disagreements.

Only the ruling class benefits; the Miami Herald making hay over it is a small aspect of how it does.

bcbm
18th July 2006, 08:30
Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2006, 03:41 PM
Tupamaros West Berlin? Only read about them through Bommi Baumann's book and read some stuff on the net about one of their actions being pretty anti-semitic - I think some members bombed a Jewish site on the anniversary of Kristallnacht but other members were not happy about the act at all. You read the Baumann book?
I'm not too familiar with T-WB, but that is possible. A lot of the support for Palestinians from Europeans began to drift into anti-semitic territory. I haven't read "Terror or Love" (That's the one, right?) but I have an interview with an ex-J2M (forget his name, its an AK press pamphlet) that outlines similar critiques of the movement (although the communiques in response weren't printed with it, sadly).