Exploited Class
20th May 2003, 02:57
Lately we have seen a lot of action by large corporations to derail one of the most basic rights of humans, the right of free speech.
We've seen a lot of the following, Dixie Chicks over seas the lead singer says only that "She is embarresed to be from Texas like Bush." and clear channel? which ones most the radio stations in the country pulled thier music.
Danny Glover was pulled from MCI ads because of statements he said, off work.
Sean Penn was attacked for his belief that there were no WMD in Iraq and a war was unjustified.
They refused to play a baseball movie that Tim Robbins was in at the baseball hall of fame. They also did not allow him to come and speak because they hid behind it Controversial and him being Political.
The right wing uses the defense in many of these cases as, "Corporations have the right to use whomever they chose to represent them." or that "They respond to customers and pull ads or songs that customers/viewers/listeners dislike.
Is this a great way to take away a right without actually taking it away? Instead of the controlling government it is the controlling companies. Same ruling class, different branch.
People and right wingers will agree, it is a companies provacative, it is the government that can't take away your rights.
So we all know that it is the same people, getting the same goal accomplished. Methods of course different.
It shows that dissent will be dealt with, it removes the unwanted speakers.
What are some other examples?
What is a good debate tactic.
I use the "So American companies dislike America and what it stands for? They hate America so much that they remove our most cherished right. Why do we let them do that? If they don't love they should leave it"
Is capitalism a perfect setup for control, does it allow for companies to dictate what is okay with bans that the government can not?
Ideas, debate?
We've seen a lot of the following, Dixie Chicks over seas the lead singer says only that "She is embarresed to be from Texas like Bush." and clear channel? which ones most the radio stations in the country pulled thier music.
Danny Glover was pulled from MCI ads because of statements he said, off work.
Sean Penn was attacked for his belief that there were no WMD in Iraq and a war was unjustified.
They refused to play a baseball movie that Tim Robbins was in at the baseball hall of fame. They also did not allow him to come and speak because they hid behind it Controversial and him being Political.
The right wing uses the defense in many of these cases as, "Corporations have the right to use whomever they chose to represent them." or that "They respond to customers and pull ads or songs that customers/viewers/listeners dislike.
Is this a great way to take away a right without actually taking it away? Instead of the controlling government it is the controlling companies. Same ruling class, different branch.
People and right wingers will agree, it is a companies provacative, it is the government that can't take away your rights.
So we all know that it is the same people, getting the same goal accomplished. Methods of course different.
It shows that dissent will be dealt with, it removes the unwanted speakers.
What are some other examples?
What is a good debate tactic.
I use the "So American companies dislike America and what it stands for? They hate America so much that they remove our most cherished right. Why do we let them do that? If they don't love they should leave it"
Is capitalism a perfect setup for control, does it allow for companies to dictate what is okay with bans that the government can not?
Ideas, debate?