Log in

View Full Version : Ideological Manifestations



Leo
9th July 2006, 01:44
As it is well know, workers movement is divided into millions of pieces, but there are some basic labels that make things simple for us. Almost all of those labels are dangerous labels, there are many people who would kill someone just for having such label, yet still those labels are products of the developing class consciousness... What are those labels? Marxism, Communism, Anarchism, for us the usual, what they are afraid of. But what is the difference between those movements? Anyone who is familiar to what lies beneath those labels can say that there is no point that those ideologies touch each other. It is almost as if they are on different planes, sort of like different manifestations of the same dream.

Anarchism is the most ancient movement, known anarchist ideas date back to ancient Greece. The hatred towards rulers, ruling institutions, hiearchy, property, bueraucracy etc. is an ancient feeling that has been developing. Anarchism takes its strength from the rebellious and passionate roots of human emotions. Paul Avrich says "Every good person is an anarchist somewhere inside", every action done for the good of human society and against oppression is guided by that feeling. This feeling, this passionate anger against oppression, the first guide of humanity against tyranny, this flame that burned in Galileo and Marx, Goldman and Einstein, Makhno and Debord, Spinoza and Guevara and many many more... Anarchism is truly the emotional ideological manifastation of our dreams.

And communism, it started at the point when we realized we could do it!... Communism is the realization of the power of imagination, it is the point where the oppressed actually realized that they can fly, that they can do what they want, where they can actually be free and happy. Communism is the world we imagine to live, the world we want to build, the reality we want to create. Communism is the intellectual ideological manifestation of our dreams.

Finally Marxism, tools of one man. While describing Marxism, I like using a resemblance to Darwinism. In fact they work almost in the same way. It is not taking every word he says but using the same tools to see the material conditions of the world and relations between classes and relations between individuals. We use those tools to understand how to achieve our dreams. Marxism is the scientific ideological manifestation of our dreams.

Naturally none of those ideological manifestations conflict each other. Yet, there had been many using those labels, each of them falsely because ideological manifestations of our dreams are incredibly powerful. Those three ideologies described might be main manifestations, but we can find more isms that are manifestations of our dreams. Ideological manifestations are products of history, the material conditions created them, therefore they are actually a common product of humanity. Even with Marxism, history would have created another Marx with another name to discover those tools. After all, everything is connected.

It is said that if enough number of people have the same dream, the dream becomes the reality. Now, all that remains for us, the dispossesed class, the working, the exploited, the oppressed, the enslaved, to unite for once and all and to start dreaming together. The possesed class is bound to fall.

Dispossesed dreamers of the world, unite!

:star:

Dean
9th July 2006, 22:30
Actually, I find that the movements, as ideas, are often identical. Trly they can appear more or less appealing to define certain ideas, but marxism can't exist without it's tone of anti - authoritarianism and of course communism.

Ol' Dirty
9th July 2006, 23:57
Leo, I know what you mean.

I find that the left is rather, ironically, non-solid. So much for solidarity, eh?

Rawthentic
10th July 2006, 01:07
I definitely agree with the "anarchist inside of us", the anti-authoritarianism and hate for oppression that fuels the dream for a communist world. It is not enough to dream, but to act on those dreams.

Leo
10th July 2006, 04:39
Leo, I know what you mean.

I find that the left is rather, ironically, non-solid. So much for solidarity, eh?

Yes, unfortunately :(

We see that right-wing movements are mostly united, because there is no place for ideas in a right wing movement, there is only submission to authority. The same thing had been tried for the left, and it did't work, and it couldn't, ever, because left is about ideas.

I think we in the left should start realizing that each of us is different and have different ideas and emotions. There are some things certain in the world, those are the material conditions. We, who have ideas, freethinkers will see and talk about what they don't want us to see. However we will disagree with each other more than usually, and this is natural. Instead of forcing authority on others to be exactly like us, and this is what led to the infamous personality cults among leftists, we must try to make people freethinkers; people who discover their own way of life, people who become independent from what the system forced into their minds and the way we do this will differ in almost every example, but it will never be entirely different, after all we all can only show the way, we can't force others to be freethinkers, doing so is against the concept. The communist society is a society of freethinkers, by promoting free thinking, we will actually be practicing communist action. Solidarity is possible, only by replacing authority with autonomy.


I definitely agree with the "anarchist inside of us", the anti-authoritarianism and hate for oppression that fuels the dream for a communist world. It is not enough to dream, but to act on those dreams.

Exactly! The first major action is, of course, unification, but other than that, our dream should be the part of our everyday life. We should live for the dream and act for the dream despite the fact we are living in the worst nightmare. Our relationship with the dream should become the revolution of our daily lives.

:star: