View Full Version : Bush Has No Authority
Ferg
30th June 2006, 06:15
He has no authority to go against the Geneve convention. Conservatives can argue in saying that they're terrorists and have no rights but that is the same as an American enemy saying that Marines do not deserve the rights of the Geneve convention. America signed the convention and they have to stick by it.
Soviet Militia
30th June 2006, 06:20
Originally posted by
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:16 AM
He has no authority to go against the Geneve convention. Conservatives can argue in saying that they're terrorists and have no rights but that is the same as an American enemy saying that Marines do not deserve the rights of the Geneve convention. America signed the convention and they have to stick by it.
We can all ***** and moan about them breaking international laws but it wont help.
What we need, is China or the DPRK to invade another country and use the exact same speech and lies that bush did, Because it would be very very interesting to see how america would respond when they are on the outside looking in.
Ferg
30th June 2006, 06:26
It would be even funnier if the Chinese government captured innocent Americans on Chinese soil, held them without charges or trial and gave them a tribunal. I would LAUGH. It would absolutly hilarious. God damn Bush, you're fuckin' yourself in the end. I only see bad in the end for America, thank god I live in Canada, where we have a minority Government to keep our Conservative leader in check or else he gets fucked the next year. What congress needs is a Chuck Norris round house kick.
Soviet Militia
30th June 2006, 06:32
Originally posted by
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:27 AM
It would be even funnier if the Chinese government captured innocent Americans on Chinese soil, held them without charges or trial and gave them a tribunal. I would LAUGH. It would absolutly hilarious. God damn Bush, you're fuckin' yourself in the end. I only see bad in the end for America, thank god I live in Canada, where we have a minority Government to keep our Conservative leader in check or else he gets fucked the next year. What congress needs is a Chuck Norris round house kick.
We still have alot of work to do, The conservatives are a scary prospect as well as the liberals.
But yah Ive said it before, America will collapse within the next 15 years, I mean there is no way they can contiue this trend with the way their economy is.
Red Heretic
30th June 2006, 09:08
Originally posted by Soviet
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:21 AM
***** and moan
I find your repeated usage of chauvinistic language to be extremely offensive...
Delta
30th June 2006, 09:14
Originally posted by Red Heretic+Jun 29 2006, 10:09 PM--> (Red Heretic @ Jun 29 2006, 10:09 PM)
Soviet
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:21 AM
***** and moan
I find your repeated usage of chauvinistic language to be extremely offensive... [/b]
I don't think that the language is meant to be sexist in anyway.
Janus
30th June 2006, 09:19
What we need, is China or the DPRK to invade another country
Not really. If China were to invade Taiwan, the US would probably denounce them but continue trading with China and if North Korea invaded South Korea, the US would also vehemently oppose it.
When you look at what Russia is doing in Chechnya or what Israel is doing in Palestine, there is evidence there of how the US would react if another country used the same reasons for an invasion. It would just depend on whether that nation were its ally or not.
Sasha Suvorov
30th June 2006, 09:23
I concur with Ferg- it would indeed be hilarious to see Bush and Co. spin a Chinese take-off on his policies! Tony Snow would be having kittens trying to figure out how 'they are bad' and 'we are good' when invoking the exact same policies.
Even better, if the Americans in question (not that I want anything bad to happen to our citizens) were held completely incommunicado I can imagine the horror stories the MSM would be concocting. BUT, if they were held having every comfort in the world EXCEPT being able to communicate with the outside world, how stupid would THAT make Bush look when the horror stories were proved to be hysterical propaganda!!
Red Heretic
30th June 2006, 09:34
Originally posted by Delta+Jun 30 2006, 06:15 AM--> (Delta @ Jun 30 2006, 06:15 AM)
Originally posted by Red
[email protected] 29 2006, 10:09 PM
Soviet
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:21 AM
***** and moan
I find your repeated usage of chauvinistic language to be extremely offensive...
I don't think that the language is meant to be sexist in anyway. [/b]
Soviet Militia has routinely used chauvinistic language in his threads (examples: he claimed Bob Avakian wasn't a "real man," and before he got banned when his username was Comrade Don, he called LSD a "fag")
I think its very important that he be criticized on his repreated usage of chauvinistic language. He says he is a Maoist, he should be able to take a bit of self-criticism here.
Ferg
30th June 2006, 17:16
Originally posted by Red Heretic+Jun 30 2006, 06:35 AM--> (Red Heretic @ Jun 30 2006, 06:35 AM)
Originally posted by
[email protected] 30 2006, 06:15 AM
Originally posted by Red
[email protected] 29 2006, 10:09 PM
Soviet
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:21 AM
***** and moan
I find your repeated usage of chauvinistic language to be extremely offensive...
I don't think that the language is meant to be sexist in anyway.
Soviet Militia has routinely used chauvinistic language in his threads (examples: he claimed Bob Avakian wasn't a "real man," and before he got banned when his username was Comrade Don, he called LSD a "fag")
I think its very important that he be criticized on his repreated usage of chauvinistic language. He says he is a Maoist, he should be able to take a bit of self-criticism here. [/b]
point taken but he wasen't using the word ***** in a sexist way nor was he using moan in a sexist way, he was just using them as a harsher way of saying comlain to get his point across better.
Karl Marx's Camel
30th June 2006, 17:56
What we need, is China or the DPRK to invade another country and use the exact same speech and lies that bush did, Because it would be very very interesting to see how america would respond when they are on the outside looking in.
[korean accent]Japan creates weapons of mass destruction. Must crush Japan. Dangerous Japan. They tried to kill my father. They not nice to babies. Aaatack![/korean accent off]
Janus
30th June 2006, 22:09
[korean accent]Japan creates weapons of mass destruction. Must crush Japan. Dangerous Japan. They tried to kill my father. They not nice to babies. Aaatack![/korean accent off]
:blink: What kind of joke are you trying to make?
Gojo
30th June 2006, 22:14
What we need, is China or the DPRK to invade another country and use the exact same speech and lies that bush did, Because it would be very very interesting to see how america would respond when they are on the outside looking in.
:huh: ?! :blink:
Jazzratt
1st July 2006, 00:06
Originally posted by
[email protected] 30 2006, 03:16 AM
He has no authority to go against the Geneve convention. Conservatives can argue in saying that they're terrorists and have no rights but that is the same as an American enemy saying that Marines do not deserve the rights of the Geneve convention. America signed the convention and they have to stick by it.
Oddly though he still does. Tells you something about the 'one law for the rich and another for the poor' (rich and poor here not used in the sense of wealth, although dubya is very rich, it's just the Geneava convention seems to apply to some other rather rich people.). Then again everyone here knows (or should know) this already.
Hate Is Art
1st July 2006, 02:34
He has no authority to go against the Geneve convention. Conservatives can argue in saying that they're terrorists and have no rights but that is the same as an American enemy saying that Marines do not deserve the rights of the Geneve convention. America signed the convention and they have to stick by it.
1. It's Geneva :)
2. They don't and you didn't really expect them to follow the rules though did you? That would be naive.
socialistpunk
1st July 2006, 19:58
Technically he does have authority because he's the president of the largest cappie state in the world and you kind of need authority to run a state that size.Im not a supporter of his regime no fucking way cristian right wing is a pile of disguised facist bullcrap.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.