Islamo Fillth And Its Hypocrisy!

[AutumnWindIsARaider]

In this article I shall describe the Islamic Paradise or Jannat which was invented by Prophet Mohammed to bribe the Arabs into committing hedious crimes by promising them materialistic things which they couldn't obtain in the harsh desert. The paradise contains six important items: beautiful virgins, young boys, water, wine, fruits and wealth.

To prove my point I have taken verses from the Koran and quotes from the Hadiths.

VIRGINS (HOURIS)

Mohammed knew that sex would sell very well among the group of his lecherous followers who were motivated to fight battles by the promise of sex slaves and booty. By constantly emphasizing to his followers that they would get untouched virgins in Paradise, Mohammed is clearly expressing his "high" opinion of the institution of marriage and his fairness to women. Once the followers go to heaven, they can conveniently ditch their wives for the fresher and more pleasurable sexual encounters with 'Houris' (beautiful virgins). Not only that, the poor wives who gave up their virginity for the pleasure of their husbands do not get even one Male Sex Bomb. But wait, Allah is all merciful! He gives the wives the rare honour of watching their husbands deflower those 72 Houris (virgins) and 28 young pre-pubescent boys.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Continued at http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/heaven.html

The possibility of sex with young boys should give the Iranians pause after they whipped then hanged http://gaypatriot.net/2006/04/21/report-ir...g-false-charges (http://gaypatriot.net/2006/04/21/report-iran-executes-gays-following-false-charges) a couple of young men for engaging in that sort of activity.

Lets us remember that we have some militant homosexual extremists on this board who support Islamic terrorism and are againt war against these folk... <_<

[RedAnarchist]

Why would we care about some contradicting rubbish in a book deemed to be "holy"? Most of us on this board are either Atheist or Agnostic.


Islamic terrorism? The insurgents are protecting their country from invaders. Are you saying that if America was invaded, you would invite the would-be oppressors into your home for tea and a nice chat?

[RaiseYourVoice]

the americans fought a guerilla war against the british for independence, they were some of the pioneres on the area of this kind of warfare.


To prove my point I have taken verses from the Koran and quotes from the Hadiths.
yes take some quotes here, some quotes from there and mix them together so it fits our opinion. i dont even bother to read this crap, course really, why should i defen islam its just another religion. and obviously this war is not only the fault of religions but of material aspects

[An archist]

I&#39;m nto trying to defend any religion, but at least muslims and muslim priests are allowed to have sex, unlike other religions eh? ;)

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Originally posted by [email protected] 25 2006, 04:19 AM
Lets us remember that we have some militant homosexual extremists on this board who support Islamic terrorism and are againt war against these folk... <_<
First, "homosexual extremist" is a patently obvious strawman - how the fuck is demanding equal tights for queers extremist?

Secondly, those so-called "homosexual extremists" do not support Islamists but support foreign peoples&#39; right to self-determination in the face of imperialism, a different matter altogether.

[AutumnWindIsARaider]

I&#39;m nto trying to defend any religion, but at least muslims and muslim priests are allowed to have sex, unlike other religions eh?

Catholics are allowed sex too....but don&#39;t tell that to young boys. ;)

[theraven]

Originally posted by [email protected] 25 2006, 06:51 AM
the americans fought a guerilla war against the british for independence, they were some of the pioneres on the area of this kind of warfare.


To prove my point I have taken verses from the Koran and quotes from the Hadiths.
yes take some quotes here, some quotes from there and mix them together so it fits our opinion. i dont even bother to read this crap, course really, why should i defen islam its just another religion. and obviously this war is not only the fault of religions but of material aspects
a) you guys mix and match bibles versus all the time

b) true america used gurellia tactics against british forces, but we didnt&#39; behead them, nor did we blow up carriages in the middle of markets..

[VermontLeft]

Yes, the koran is a bloody and awful midieval sack of lies which justifies all sorts of horrible things.

Just like every other religious text.

you guys are "discovering" something that communists figured out 150 years ago.

Welcome to the 19th century.... :rolleyes:

[Jazzratt]

Originally posted by [email protected] 25 2006, 02:40 PM
a) you guys mix and match bibles versus all the time

b) true america used gurellia tactics against british forces, but we didnt&#39; behead them, nor did we blow up carriages in the middle of markets..
a) Which shows that the bible can be interpreted by anyone in any way as long as they can copy out a couple of verses. Kinda makes you wonder about how seriously we should be taking the book if anyone can make it say anything - especially since it has so many contradicting statements.

b) That&#39;s because those tactics had yet to become widespread. Also beheading somone is just another way of killing them, if you shoot them or behead them they&#39;re still dead but beheading has the added bonus of demoralising their friends. Using vehiclilar IEDs is a fiarly sound tactic although unsing them in a mainly civilian area or whilst the vehicle has a driver strike me as supremely stupid but no more morally repugnant thank americans bombing populated areas (by accident of course. Just like all that back shooting (er, I mean &#39;friendly&#39; fire) you guys did in the world wars.).

[Comrade-Z]

Islam is filth, I&#39;ll give you that.


b) true america used gurellia tactics against british forces, but we didnt&#39; behead them, nor did we blow up carriages in the middle of markets..

If American revolutionaries had had IED technology back then, I&#39;m sure they would have used them.

I mean, god, those American revolutionaries...er, I mean terrorists hid behind trees and specifically targeted officers with shots to the back&#33; Ah, those sick fucks&#33; If only Britain had had B-2 bombers back then, they could have cluster-bombed Philadelphia back into the stone age. If course, lots of civilians would have died due to "collateral damage," but who the hell cares? Those were cold-blooded terrorists that they were after&#33; :rolleyes:

The point is, British people had the same kinds of feelings about American revolutionaries as Americans have about modern day "terrorists."

[theraven]

Originally posted by Comrade&#045;[email protected] 25 2006, 04:41 PM
Islam is filth, I&#39;ll give you that.


b) true america used gurellia tactics against british forces, but we didnt&#39; behead them, nor did we blow up carriages in the middle of markets..

If American revolutionaries had had IED technology back then, I&#39;m sure they would have used them.

I mean, god, those American revolutionaries...er, I mean terrorists hid behind trees and specifically targeted officers with shots to the back&#33; Ah, those sick fucks&#33; If only Britain had had B-2 bombers back then, they could have cluster-bombed Philadelphia back into the stone age. If course, lots of civilians would have died due to "collateral damage," but who the hell cares? Those were cold-blooded terrorists that they were after&#33; :rolleyes:

The point is, British people had the same kinds of feelings about American revolutionaries as Americans have about modern day "terrorists."
not really, many would agure that cornwallis held back, and also remember that unlike america and the terroirst over there, the britsiha nd americas were almost cousions.

[Zero]

He didn&#39;t "hold back" he was in a fucking war with France.

[violencia.Proletariat]

AutumnWindIsARaider, how can you even start to criticize a religion when you are a godsucker yourself. Can we say hypocrite?