Ahmadinejad's Letter to Bush

[Ander]

For those of you who are not aware, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran, sent Bush a letter a few days ago. It is actually quite interesting. Check it out:

http://medias.lemonde.fr/mmpub/edt/doc/200...9629_lettre.pdf (http://medias.lemonde.fr/mmpub/edt/doc/20060509/769629_lettre.pdf)

[MurderInc]

Ahmadinejad is a serious psycho.

[Leo]

Ah, that such a sweet letter!!! :) :D :lol: Wouldn't Bush and Ahmadinejad make a wonderful ( :P :!: ) couple!!!

Seriously, I find Iran's situation pretty dangerous right now. According to the German press, US is planning to test a new nuke in Colorado in June 21st and attack Iran in the following month. Germany will support US secretly but publicly they won't be that supportive. Turkey is going to co-operate and help US forces but won't actively join the war. Israel is most definetly going to join the war. Very disturbing, and the fact that no other newspaper, especially no American newspaper writes about this is more disturbing... Hopefully a new war won't start.

[drain.you]

US is planning to test a new nuke in Colorado in June 21st and attack Iran in the following month
I doubt that source is too reliable. I mean, it wouldn't get published if it was true caus Iran would find out and would have time to prepare or retaliate.

[Leo]

I doubt that source is too reliable. I mean, it wouldn't get published if it was true caus Iran would find out and would have time to prepare or retaliate.

It might not be, but as no other source 'screamed' about this, it might be something that leaked out. I hope you are right but I mean how is Iran gonna prepare for a nuke anyway?

[DORRI]

what do you really think about it? :huh:
the last sentence ( va salam ala man ataba alhoda) is an arabic phrase from quran and means peace be upon those who fallow the path of the righteous

[Leo]

what do you really think about it?

I don't really have a specific prediction...I'm not sure...At one side I want to think that it won't happen...but based on what I learned in the past about world politics, I feel it will. I don't know, we will see.

[Leftolefty]

okay Leo, I could agree with you at some point, wars agree or not, could happen anywhere on the planet, but when its come up with human being nukes one more time its seems to be something really hard to be accepted moraly, by the way could you please help me/us with links of that Germans press associated with that very very disturbing news?

[wet blanket]

The likelihood of a United States military strike on Iran at the moment is really slim to non-existant. There's also a ton of speculation surrounding the issue so I'd dismiss any claims of a US strike on Iranian soil in the near future, unless they come from a verifiable source. I'm guessing that there will be sanctions and the inevitable skyrocketing oil prices, a confrontation between Russia/China and the west in the UN, and a lot of saber-rattling between Iran and Israel.

Things are very complicated at the moment with major developments every week it seems. I get the feeling that all of this could have a very interesting/deadly climax in the coming years.

[peaccenicked]

I think any responsible peace activist must keep a very close eye on the US threat to Iran. Speculation exists because Bush has not ruled anything out and the removal of Jack Straw from the post of British foreign secretary is a bad sign. He said a nuclear strike on iran would be "nuts"
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/07/...in1596108.shtml (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/07/politics/main1596108.shtml).
The insanity of such an act might be a problem for sensible people get their heads around. Nevertheless Iran is the leading player against US interests in the world.
http://cryptogon.com/2006_05_07_blogarchiv...756741701030786 (http://cryptogon.com/2006_05_07_blogarchive.html#114756741701030786)

The new British foriegn minister Beckett is following Bush
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2006...tt_defends.html (http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2006/05/beckett_defends.html)

As each day passes the news is like a follow up to the iraqi war.
http://www.carnegieendowment.org/npp/publi...fa=view&id=1308 (http://www.carnegieendowment.org/npp/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1308)

And
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8958


The timing of such insanity might be marked by a 9/11 type attack

"Reynolds argued that 9/11 truth is a matter of extreme urgency, since the perpetrators seem to be preparing another 9/11-style terror hoax as a pretext for attacking Iran with nuclear weapons. He said that exposing the 9/11 fraud is the best way to stop Cheney’s plan to stage an unprovoked nuclear attack on Iran, and the military draft and Pinochet-style prison camps and death squads for dissenters that might accompany it"
from
http://milwaukee.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/205461.shtml

The point is to stop this madness in anyway we can.

The heat is on.


The US bully is huffing and puffing. Iran is huffing and puffing, it is a dangerous situation akin to the Cuban missile crisis.
Burying our heads in the sand is not a good idea.
We have to let everybody know, and the left is beginning to wake up.
http://www.socialistworker.org/2006-1/588/...Hypocrisy.shtml (http://www.socialistworker.org/2006-1/588/588_04_Hypocrisy.shtml)
People get ready! make our voices heard. We ve got our own huffing and puffing to do.

[andrew_the_fox]

9/11 was a hoax.

once we get attacked again in another falsified "terrorist" attack, we'll be sending troops elsewhere. Which brings up another topic of "Border Control" which the moron talked about tonight in his address to the nation. Why do we fear terrorists sneaking across our borders when the supposed "9/11 Hijackers" all came in legally?

The hypocrisy is incredible.