Log in

View Full Version : Voting for the "well qualified atheist"



LSD
22nd April 2006, 04:55
A recent Canadian poll indicates that 68% of voters would elect an Atheist or Muslim Prime Minister. By contast, in the US, fully 52% of voters indicate that they would not elect an Atheist President, 14 percent more than the percentage who say they would not vote for a Muslim! :o

This highlights rather sharply the difference between the two countries' views on religion and, more specifically, on the role of religion in politics.

This data would seem to show that, as far the Canadian public is concerned, lack of religious "faith" is irrelevent; whereas Americans seem to find it objectionable.

I think, more than any census data or "self-identification" information, this shows just how powerful the Christian right is in the US as compared with the rest of the industrialized world.

That, even in the current climate of blatant antiarab hysteria, more Americans would vote for a Muslim than an Atheist shows just how important "faith" has become in the entire American socioeconomic system.

For those who deny that there is a real threat from conservative Christian groups or who claim that the US isn't "special" in its conservative movement, this clearly demonstrates how deluded such a position is.

There is simply no other country in the "west" today that values "faith" so highly. And considering that we're talking about the country with the most deadly standing army in the world, that's an incredibly scary fact! :o

Canadian poll (http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/11631)
American poll (http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=19114)

RevMARKSman
22nd April 2006, 12:43
...It's not fascism when we do it! :ph34r:

This is scary...When exactly is this revolution we speak of going to start?

Hegemonicretribution
22nd April 2006, 13:01
Originally posted by [email protected] 22 2006, 11:58 AM
...It's not fascism when we do it! :ph34r:

This is scary...When exactly is this revolution we speak of going to start?
Not when 52% of the electorate worship imaginary figures, and see their "leader" as the messenger.

I doubt that things would actually start in America (at least Northern America) primarily. I think a more scular Europe would be a better bet for things kicking off first. Over there the only issues are those that are seen to be affecting the people in perceived reality, the trick is to make this more realistic. When the enemy isn't seen as immigrants, or heathens, much more is possible.

The Bitter Hippy
23rd April 2006, 15:16
Don't look for any revolutions coming from the UK at least, not for the next few centuries. The anti-communist sentiment inherent to society will take at least another three generations to be diluted to an extent that any mass communist revolution is possible :(... Even worse, if the revolution started elsewhere in europe, the british proletariat would be swayed by the right-wing tabloids into a fever of hate and terror... It seems we must wait for gradual changes in ideas or some major event...

violencia.Proletariat
23rd April 2006, 20:18
Who is this poll supposed to cover? Half of the voting-able population in the US does NOT vote. Is it 52% of these people? If so thats not as significant as it seems.