Originally posted by
[email protected] 29 2006, 12:20 AM
For sure, a street fight (especially between groups of people) is in many ways different from a one on one sport fight. But the flipside is that some "Reality Based" systems without sparring can leave people over-confident about their capacity to 'end a fight with a single blow', and that type of thing.
One thing about Systema - and it has been criticsed for being "too brutal" in this respect - is that you damn well finish the guy ! ;)
I agree with you about this, and I hear the Aikido types usually criticise Systema in this way, I think it was the knife disarming they where criticising, because in the video clips Vlad would always basically redirect the blade and stab the guy attacking, and they thought it was too cruel... I'm sorry, but someone tries to stab me, unless it's a good friend who went off his rocker, I'm gonna' shove it up his ass if I can! :lol:
Then again, my Systema instructor told me Krav Maga is too brutal, and I met a Krav Maga instructor not too long ago who said the same thing about Systema! :huh:
The lesson here is that people talk a lot, but we have to realize it's their interpretation, and that different MA's will work for different people and what you heard is not always true. Also, what you see might be different from what you feel. Watching training drills is a lot different from trying them out and then actually applying those techniques.
The human body can take a hell of a lot of abuse, and styles with hard sparring at least give you some sense of your capacities and of how hard it can be to actually do damage to somebody that is seriously resisting you.
Not if your wearing gloves, which we rarely ever do in Systema. In fact, I thought it was odd that they used them in that UK clip. I just got back from Systema about an hour ago, and my eye has a cut because I was hit with a staff... I didn't move fast enough. We were doing a drill were one guy is in the middle with the staff and tries to hit 4-5 others, casually, with the staff. Now, had he really wanted to hit me with the staff, a single blow could have knocked me out or even killed me. But the point of the drill is to teach you to move, and get out of the way of the weapon. You challenge yourself by moving in closer and closer, but in a real life situation, you are not going to do that - unless you really needed to take him out - you would run at first chance. This is just a traiing drill to teach you not to get hit before you can run!
I agree with you that struggling with a fully resisting opponent is different and it is very frustrating to take someone down who is really solid. We do it from time to time though, so I've been through this before... but guess what? A tree is stiff and sturdy but when it starts to fall: "temburrrr!" ;)
So guy is trying to wrestle you to the ground and with brute strenght, and you can lock up with him and get into a stenght battle, sure you can see how it feels. But if he is stronger than he will win. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out. Watch what happens though, if you grab him by the ears and force him in one direction simply by walking, etc., or maybe let him take you down but meanwhile you are ripping out his eyeball. The point is brute strenght, speed, etc. has it's limits. So if the guy is bigger, stronger, faster, etc. then you, what do you do? I would like to think something is possible.
Sure there are some people out there who could take the eye goughing, knees to the balls, etc. but it's rare, and I honestly don't think full force sparing is going to help you figure this out. I haven't seen a MA school that goes full contact, atleast not with anything goes, so how you can apply this to the street is still debatable.
And no, I'm not saying fighting with gloves / pads shouldn't be done... it's fun and great excercise, sharpens your reflexes, sensitivity, builds stamina and stenght, etc. but we have to know the difference.
I'll give another example: we did a lot fo ground fighting today, and we did this in groups of threes rather than two guys wrestling. You get a BJJ to take down a guy, lock him up and he breaks his arm, fine. But then another guy is stomping on the BJJ guy's face. Thisis the reality of the street and mass fights. Systema teaches to deal with this situation, and even how to breath / not get crushed if six guys pile on top of you....
Sounds like you've found a good mix of training though - savate should gives you a solid practical base in striking, and judo is a great (and often under-rated) grappling style.
Thanks, it really has helped... I have actually used it in a at least two situations (Toledo riot, and once to push off security gaurds when we disrupted an MPP press conference on a campus).
I agree with you that Judo is severely underrated, my main criticism of Judo / Jiu Jitsu is the Gi, you've simply got to work without it sometimes if you want it to work in the street... That being said, it really depends on the instructor and what he is teaching for. I would also argue in this case that the "sporty" aspect can get in the way. You try to do certain Judo takedowns on a guy wearing an undershirt, and it will rip in your hands! :D
That said, Judo guys are hard to take down and get on top of, and are really good at staying on top on the ground.
On the flipside, Systema teaches that sometimes you want to be on the bottom... like when someone is firing off a gun. Sometimes we will be wrestling for about 5 minutes (which feels like 5 hours) and my instructor will suddenly announce that he is going to use the whip on whoever is on top! :lol: That's when the bigger guys lose, because trying to get een a smaller guy on top of you when you've already pinned him is not easy, espcially if that small guy is goughing your eyes, ripping your ears, wrenching your skin, breaking your fingers, etc...
Systema sounds a bit esoteric, but it seems like you're getting a lot of useful things out of it. It's probably one of those things I'd have to experience to fully appreciate.
Believe me, it's really not estoric; but it is something you really have to try to get a feel of. I am willing to admit that not everyone would like it, but I don't think there is any one MA out there that fits everyone. I did carefully study before I made my descision, and I am really confident that I made the right choice. Even just the fact that my breathing is better in general, and I'm in better shape is owed to Systema!
Glad it's worked for you, but one of my AFA comrades who was a brownbelt in TKD eventually switched over to kickboxing and Muay Thai because he found that TKD hand techniques were not as effective as western boxing, and that all the high kicks from TKD were not very useful on the street because they tend to leave you off balance.
I took TKD when I was young, as I mentioned, and I disgree with you somewhat. The main thing is, certain people can kick and some can't. Even though I take Savate, I really can't kick for shit, simply because I'm a short beer bellied guy, and even if I could kick really high / long it's still not going to be that high or long! :lol:
Therefor, I only use low kicks and go for knees, balls, ankles, etc.
My dad was a bit taller and skinny, so it worked well for him.
Any high kicks will leave you off balance, so if you start using that crap in a street fight and you have not been practicing it for like 20 years you will probably get fucked up. Stick with low sneaky kicks. That said, if your high kicks are even a bit decent, your low kicks should be good.
As for comparing the punches to western boxing, some people really like to use their hands... some are fist fighters, well others prefer a different approach. If I was attacked by a boxer, I would definately want to take him down or confine his hands somehow, and kicking could be useful even in just breaking his/her posture and composure....
My main criticism of TKD was that it is too constrictive; you are supposed to block, kick, punch, etc in a certain way and maintain a certain stance. I find that it's somewhat dogmatic and also won't transfer well to a street situation, were you aren't always going to be in a stance when someone suddenly attacks you by surprise. Systema was like a fresh breath of air in the sense, for me. This might not be the same feeling for someone else who feels comfortable an reassured by certain stances, techniques, etc.
TKD did teach me decent balance, how to throw a punch/ kick with power, and what parts of the body are vunerable.
Muay Thai is a great stand up style that emphasizes practical and effective low kicks, knees and elbows that work very well in street fights.
Some MT does, some doesn't. I have weak shins, and they often hit with the shin. I wouldn't try to do some of those kicks, because if the other guy simply raises their knee, it would hurt like hell when I hit! That said, MT guys toughin' it up and kick bamboo trees with their shin. The knees and elbows are excellent. The balance, I'm not entirely convinced. The MT guys tend to fall on their asses in fights more than the Savate guys, and as with both styles the sporty aspect of it assumes the other guy can only do to you what you are doing, so you get a good grappler who suddenly has you in his paws you could be fucked. That said, MT is overall an excellent striking art that could mix well with a grappling style.
Have you seen Tony Ja? This guy is like the next Bruce Lee. He does Mauy Thai Boran (which is sort of like the more traditional version), and also mixes in some TKD in some of his kicks. This fight is from "Ong Bak Mauy Thai Warrior":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PolCX6EG6TY&search=tony%20ja
He also does some crazy stunts like Jackie Chan, only he doesn't use any safety lines, nets or matting... Ong Bak is a great movie...
There is also a military style of MT apprantly, though I have never seen it it is supposed to be M. Bison's from Street Fighter II style.... ;)
FYI, here's a TKD vs. Muay Thai clip:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=s3X6jrV1vOY&sea...ay%20thai%20tkd (http://youtube.com/watch?v=s3X6jrV1vOY&search=muay%20thai%20tkd)
To be fair, the TKD guy looks like brown belt, and some of the TKD places give away belts like AOL floppies in the 1990s. TKD is such a popular MA, that it's almost a given their is going to be lots of morons out there... The Kickboxing guy clearly had the better game. That said, I think there was a TKD guy that actually did well in UFC a decade ago, before UFC had lots of rules and was basically all out fighting.
As my MA instructor says, more often than not, it's the fighter and not the style. Certain styles though, build good fighters. But of course that also requires good instructors. :)
On an odd note, the KB guy's name is Tomi Makkonen and he's Finish... At first I thought it was Tomi Makinen, the WRC driver for Mitsubishi... maybe a second hobby... nevermind.. :lol: