Log in

View Full Version : Religious attendance could increase longevity?



Janus
4th April 2006, 23:46
Originally posted by AP Press
The effects of exercise, religious attendance and anti-cholesterol drugs on life expectancy were examined.
All three were found to be beneficial, with religious attendance adding two to three years to your life.
The results of the research were published in the March-April issue of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.
Community factor?
Using age-dependent death-rate statistics, scientists from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center found that weekly attendance at religious services accounted for an additional two to three years.
Regular physical exercise clocked up an extra three to five years and cholesterol-reducing drugs such as Lipitor cholesterol about 2.5 to 3.5 years.
Study leader Daniel Hall, a resident in general surgery at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, told the LiveScience website that the benefits of religious attendance may stem more from social set-up, than faith.
"There is something about being knit into the type of community that religious communities embody that has a way of mediating a positive health effect," he said.
Financial cost
He also suggested that religion may have a role in reducing stress, or at least in boosting an individual's ability to cope.
"Being in a religious community helps you make meaning out of your life," he said.
However, such benefits do not come for free. The study estimated the cost of each year of life apparently gained by each method.
The costs were based on average gym fees, medical costs and household donations to religious institutions:
The approximate cost per life-year gained was:
· $2,000 to $6,000 for regular exercise
· $3,000 to $10,000 for regular religious attendance
· $4,000 and $14,000 for cholesterol-lowering drugs.

I wonder who sponsored this study? Did the study account for all the other factors that can maintain a healthy and long life?

redstar2000
5th April 2006, 00:30
Bad "science"! :o

How did they find out if the people in the study (1) actually exercised; (2) actually went to church every week; (3) actually took their medicine as prescribed?

The subjects were all dead...so someone else must have told them. Why should their memory have been accurate or, for that matter, why should they have bothered to tell the truth even if they knew it?

This is the kind of "study" that "looks scientific" and don't mean shit.

There's a lot of that going around these days. :angry:

http://www.websmileys.com/sm/cool/223.gif

GoaRedStar
5th April 2006, 00:44
Yeah there is a load of shitty science out there here is another one "Jesus Walked on Ice, Study Says" from the Florida State University Professor of Oceanography Doron Nof.

http://www.physorg.com/news63367761.html

I posted something in it forum http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=5811&st=15

Comrade-Z
5th April 2006, 00:46
Even if this were true, just think of all the years those people pissed away at church before getting to live a few years longer. If they were truly regular church-goers, they still ended up a few years in the hole, I reckon, by investing their time with religious ceremonies.