The "left" wing of the Republicrat party is

[Cheung Mo]

http://www.surveyusa.com/50State2006/50Sta...al060315Net.htm (http://www.surveyusa.com/50State2006/50StateBushApproval060315Net.htm)

-14 for Bush in Texas?

Whether or not you have anything good to say about the Democrats, this is just funny.

Incidentally, I don't think the GOP rigs elections: Why would they have to when the Republicrat Party already uses ballot access laws, the media, bought and sold "labour" and corporate interests, and dirty money to rig the American electoral system against parties opposed to the status quo?

[Zak]

I don't know if the left of the Republicans are gaing power, or if people have come to realize Bush is full of shit. Too bad they realized it two years after he got relected.

[YKTMX]

His numbers are fucking unbelievable right now.

I mean, you'd probably get similar numbers to those if you asked the question, "do you approve or dissaprove of giving poor kids Malaria?".


He can only get 44% of the population of Kansas to support his stupid policies.

[Atlas Swallowed]

The whole US government is a full of shit and has been long before any of us were born. Bush just has taken it to another level. Alot of the laws in the Patiot Act were attempted in the Clinton addministration after the OKC bombings. Government terrorism against its own people, something both addministrations had in common besides representation of the wealthy and corporations over anyone else.

[Guerrilla22]

The left wing of the republican party? You mean, the wing that isn't made up of Evangelical theocrats or war mongering neo-cons? The more traditional conservatives? I never thought I'd say this, but I actually miss the time when they controlled the GOP.

[SmithSmith]

"In the United States, the political system is a very marginal affair. There are two parties, so-called, but they're really factions of the same party, the Business Party. Both represent some range of business interests. In fact, they can change their positions 180 degrees, and nobody even notices. In the 1984 election, for example, there was actually an issue, which often there isn't. The issue was Keynesian growth versus fiscal conservatism. The Republicans were the party of Keynesian growth: big spending, deficits, and so on. The Democrats were the party of fiscal conservatism: watch the money supply, worry about the deficits, et cetera. Now, I didn't see a single comment pointing out that the two parties had completely reversed their traditional positions. Traditionally, the Democrats are the party of Keynesian growth, and the Republicans the party of fiscal conservatism. So doesn't it strike you that something must have happened? Well, actually, it makes sense. Both parties are essentially the same party. The only question is how coalitions of investors have shifted around on tactical issues now and then. As they do, the parties shift to opposite positions, within a narrow spectrum." Noam Chomsky

[Eleutherios]

Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2006, 08:21 PM
The left wing of the republican party? You mean, the wing that isn't made up of Evangelical theocrats or war mongering neo-cons? The more traditional conservatives? I never thought I'd say this, but I actually miss the time when they controlled the GOP.
No, the left wing of the Republicrat Party, also known as the Demoblican party.