Log in

View Full Version : win for pro-choicers



rioters bloc
17th February 2006, 03:15
Vote makes pill available within a year

By MALCOLM FARR and ALISON REHN

February 17, 2006

THE abortion pill RU486 will be in pharmacies within a year after a big majority of MPs yesterday gave away ministerial veto of its use.

Women MPs and senators applauded a final vote in the House of Representatives which passed legislation giving the Therapeutic Goods Administration power of approval.

Click here to see what your local member said in parliament

About two-thirds of the House of Representatives backed the Bill, although Mr Abbott declined to call for a specific tally of votes after it was obvious he didn't have the numbers.

He appeared upset by the outcome and issued a statement saying: "I am disappointed that the Bill has passed but am confident the TGA will exercise its additional responsibilities with utmost professionalism."

Democrats leader Lyn Allison, who introduced the Bill in the Senate, said the vote was a "wonderful win for women".

Senator Allison said Australian women could expect to be able to access RU486, like women in the US, the UK and New Zealand, within a year.

"I would hope that the vote today clears the air," she said.

An hour before the conscience vote Prime Minister John Howard tried to rally MPs to support an amendment which would have allowed Parliament to still have veto power over the drug.

The Prime Minister said restoring control of the drug to the TGA was a cop-out.

"There is just a whiff in this whole debate of this being a little too difficult and controversial, so let's give it to somebody else," he said. "I'm disappointed ... because in the end, we are elected to make decisions on difficult issues.

In a compelling five-minute speech, Labor's Health spokeswoman Julia Gillard, a strident supporter of the bill, said she agreed with former US President Bill Clinton that abortion should be safe, legal and rare.

"If we were to truly live in a world where abortion was safe, legal and rare then we would need to live in a world where there was no sexual violence against women ... where no woman was ever bullied or pressured into having sex," she said.

The conscience vote, which eliminates parties directing MPs how to ballot, was dramatic. Female senators who sponsored the original Bill sat to one side, watching closely as events unfolded.

Labor Party MPs bunked up alongside Liberal Party members, Treasurer Peter Costello sat on opposite sides of the House from his close friend and Health Minister Tony Abbott and his boss, Mr Howard.

It took an hour to get the result, with MPs first dealt with two amendments which would, in different ways, have allowed parliamentary oversight over the approval of the drug.

source: the daily telegraph (http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,20281,18169635-5001021,00.html)

rioters bloc
17th February 2006, 03:18
this is belated, but here's the exuse one islamophobic mp gave for voting against the pill...

Muslims targeted in RU 486control debate

A former government minister is urging her colleagues to keep control of abortion drug RU 486with the parliament to stop Australia becoming predominantly Muslim.

MPs will begin debating a bill which would strip control over the drug from Health Minister Tony Abbott.

Last week the Senate backed the legislation by a 45 to 28 majority.

Liberal backbencher Danna Vale is backing moves for parliament to retain power of approval over the controversial abortion-inducing pill.

Mrs Vale argued that such a move would stop Australia from aborting itself out of existence and ultimately becoming a Muslim nation.

"I've actually read in The Daily Telegraph where a certain imam from the Lakemba mosque actually said that Australia's going to be a Muslim nation in 50 years' time," she said.

"I didn't believe him at the time, but you know when you actually look at the birth rates and when you look at the fact that we are aborting ourselves almost out of existence by100 , 000abortions every year and that's on a guesstimate.

"You multiply that by 50 years, that's five million potential Australians we won't have here."

MPs will have a rare conscience vote to decide whether the health minister's control should be handed to medical experts at the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

source: nine msn (http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=85905)

Commie Rat
17th February 2006, 06:12
yay

Nathe
17th February 2006, 09:07
another womens rights victory!!!

equality for all

Nothing Human Is Alien
17th February 2006, 09:38
That second article is fucking disgusting. "We've got to preserve Autralia for the whites. We don't want to abort ourselves out of existence!" What a load of shit.

Clutch
17th February 2006, 09:52
For once, just once and perhaps only once, the system actually works.

rioters bloc
17th February 2006, 10:05
Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2006, 09:19 PM
For once, just once and perhaps only once, the system actually works.
i wouldn't go that far hun ;)

the abortion pill is much less violating than invasive surgery, and seemingly safer as well, and so is definitely a step forward. however, abortion is still in the criminal code, and you need to satisfy a number of criteria to be eligible for abortion. basically, you have to prove that if you didn't have an abortion, you would be physically or psychologically traumatised.

so it's just as hard to get an abortion. it's just that the process is easier and offers more choice to women who are allowed to get one.

but nonetheless, it is progress. apparently this has been the most tense and volatile debate since the pill. australia is rather uptight abt &#39;sexual morals&#39; it seems <_<

chebol
17th February 2006, 10:48
but nonetheless, it is progress. apparently this has been the most tense and volatile debate since the pill. australia is rather uptight abt &#39;sexual morals&#39; it seems

Interestingly that dates back to the earliet days of settlement, when apparently homosexual behaviour was rife...... My ex-flatmate (who works at UTS) referrred me to an article on this about half a year ago.

Clutch
17th February 2006, 22:13
Originally posted by rioters bloc+Feb 17 2006, 08:32 PM--> (rioters bloc @ Feb 17 2006, 08:32 PM)
[email protected] 17 2006, 09:19 PM
For once, just once and perhaps only once, the system actually works.
i wouldn&#39;t go that far hun ;)

the abortion pill is much less violating than invasive surgery, and seemingly safer as well, and so is definitely a step forward. however, abortion is still in the criminal code, and you need to satisfy a number of criteria to be eligible for abortion. basically, you have to prove that if you didn&#39;t have an abortion, you would be physically or psychologically traumatised.

so it&#39;s just as hard to get an abortion. it&#39;s just that the process is easier and offers more choice to women who are allowed to get one.

but nonetheless, it is progress. apparently this has been the most tense and volatile debate since the pill. australia is rather uptight abt &#39;sexual morals&#39; it seems <_< [/b]
Guess I was wrong then...