Log in

View Full Version : 'Exile or trial' for Nepal king



WUOrevolt
13th February 2006, 01:44
'Exile or trial' for Nepal king
By Charles Haviland
BBC Nepal correspondent



Only one photo of Prachanda had been in circulation until now
Nepal's top Maoist rebel leader has said the only future he can envisage for King Gyanendra is exile or trial.

Prachanda made his remarks in a rare BBC interview to mark the 10th anniversary of the Maoist revolt.

He said a trial of the king might take place in a "people's court", leading to possible execution.

However, elsewhere in the interview Prachanda also said he could envisage Nepal remaining a monarchy if the people wanted it.

'People's verdict'

This was the first face-to-face broadcast interview given by the Maoist's reclusive chairman, Prachanda, who has been living an underground existence for 25 years.

Whatever decision the people should give, we will be ready to accept this

Maoist leader Prachanda

His rebels now control much of the countryside, but this is a conflict most observers believe neither side can win militarily. The Maoists are pressing for an elected assembly to write a new Nepalese constitution.

Prachanda said he believed such an assembly would make Nepal into a republic. But he said his party would accept "the people's verdict".


The rebels are in effective control of large swathes of rural Nepal
"Whatever decision the people should give, we will be ready to accept this," he told the BBC.

Asked if that meant he would theoretically be able to accept a people's verdict of keeping the monarchy, he said: "Yes, theoretically it is like that."

But asked later what place the king might have in Nepal five years from now, Prachanda said: "I think he'll either be executed by the people's court or maybe exiled."

He said the king, who took direct political power a year ago, had left no room for compromise.

Nepal does not allow capital punishment and Prachanda's comments will shock many Nepalis and probably cause discomfort to a group of opposition parties which recently signed a political agreement with the Maoists.

'Pragmatic'

Prachanda said he was "saddened" by the number of deaths in the conflict - some 13,000 - and by what he called accidents such as the death of children in bomb blasts.

But he was unrepentant about using violence against those he described as informers.

Asked if the Maoists aimed to conquer the capital, Kathmandu, militarily, he said that foreign help to the government had made that difficult, and that such an action would "cause a lot of harm to the Nepali people".

Analysts say the Maoists are nowadays a pragmatic party, and for much of this interview the 52-year-old Maoist reflected this.

But at other times he spoke with what seemed like rage against those he repeatedly described as feudalists.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4707040.stm

Amusing Scrotum
13th February 2006, 02:56
If this interview is accurate, then it seems a reasonably interesting confirmation that the "most radical" participants in the Nepalese bourgeois revolution, are starting to think of themselves as the new bourgeois. For instance....


Originally posted by BBC News+--> (BBC News)Asked if that meant he would theoretically be able to accept a people's verdict of keeping the monarchy, he said: "Yes, theoretically it is like that."[/b]

Radical words about "exile" or "execution" really don't hold the same weight when you go on to say you'll "accept" the King if the "people want him". Indeed the way Prachanda has "covered all the bases" is rather similar to the way a bourgeois politician refuses to give a "straight answer".

Plus there's this....


BBC News
Prachanda said he believed such an assembly would make Nepal into a republic. But he said his party would accept "the people's verdict".

Viva la Republic! :lol:

All this when coupled with the "breaking news" about "Multi Party Democracy" and Prachanda's "suave" suit (see article). Suggest Prachanda is about to settle for being Nepal's top Social Democrat.

Bob Avakian will be pissed - all that fundraising and cheerleading and he won't even get "Maoist Socialism".

Drat! :lol:

Kia
13th February 2006, 03:30
Im glad he said that. it shows that he is more interested in what the people want, then trying to force a form of government apon them. It shows that he is truly a man of the people and not a slave to one cause. I do hope that they go with a communist government and not monarchy, they should have learnt by now which is best.
The other possibility is that this "interview" could have been "swayed" by the BBC's main stream liberalism. That in fact he said nothing like this, but they altered is words to fit the story they wanted. wouldnt surprise me in the least.
Choosing to Exile the King would be a better idea then trying him by court. It usually takes YEARS for a country to try,convict, and punish the past leaders that have delt wrong to the country. Hopefully they could make an agreement with other nearby countries to exile the King from their countries too, that way hed have an extremely slim chance of building up some form of resistance and taking power again.

Janus
13th February 2006, 22:10
Im glad he said that. it shows that he is more interested in what the people want, then trying to force a form of government apon them. It shows that he is truly a man of the people and not a slave to one cause.
That's what every Maoist since Mao himself has said. Is there any truth in the statement? Well, just look at what occured in China.


I do hope that they go with a communist government and not monarchy, they should have learnt by now which is best.
The best that the Maoists can do is establish capitalism and thereby forge the foundations for communism.

Who knows what we can expect. Prachanda has stated that he would "theoretically" accept a monarchy. So far, he's mostly called for a constituent assembly and a democratic republic. Is he truthful? Well, we'll just have to see.

Dreckt
13th February 2006, 22:40
I agree with Janus. I'm not so sure it is a good thing if the maoists defeats the monarchy and establishes a form of People's Republic there. It would become another China/Vietnam all over again. Then the leader of the revolution dies and the country keeps it's party but adopts market capitalism.

So - the best thing would be if the people ousted the king and established a capitalist republic in order to later develop into socialism.

BattleOfTheCowshed
13th February 2006, 22:42
So what we're basically seeing is a bourgeois revolution, thats not that bad, hopefully it will get rid of that ancient mode of government: monarchy, give the people a better standard of living/freedom and set the stage for a future sociaist revolution.