Log in

View Full Version : biosecurity protocol



pedro san pedro
10th February 2006, 21:44
131 countries are meeting in Brazil next month for the next round of talks in the biosafety protocol. this protocol, if adopted, would put the onus on exporters to declare any viable GMO's before the enter a destination country - ie any live organisms - eg viable maize seed - that have been genetically engineered. the protocol has particually strong support amongst developing nations who do not have access to the funds needed to maintain strict biosecruity measures at their borders.

however, at the last round last year, New Zealand - a GE-free nation with incrediably strong bio-security and a zero tolerance policy toward the import of viable GMO's - and Brazil voted against the protocol - blocking the wishes of the other 117 countries present. It is believed that New Zealand - who stands to gain a lot economically from such a protocol (being GE-free) voted in this manner largely at the request of both the USA and Canada, neither of whom have ratified the protocol, but both of whom would be affected by it.

the protocol would go a long way toward containing the spread of GMO's - both Mexico and Brazil have been heavily affected by the spread of undeclared GMO's that have entered the borders - and toward giving poorer countires the right to self determination.
The protocol also provides an important safety net for monitoring the spread of GMO's - should an organism prove to be dangerous to human health in the future, we currently have very little means of tracking where it has spread thoughout the world.

Severian
11th February 2006, 21:34
Originally posted by pedro san [email protected] 10 2006, 04:11 PM
131 countries are meeting in Brazil next month for the next round of talks in the biosafety protocol. this protocol, if adopted, would put the onus on exporters to declare any viable GMO's before the enter a destination country - ie any live organisms - eg viable maize seed - that have been genetically engineered.
Your example shows how silly some of the paranoia is.

Maize can't grow without human help. If a cob of corn falls to the ground, there are too many competing seeds for any of them to grow successfully.

So there's no risk of a plague of supercorn.

pedro san pedro
11th February 2006, 23:41
and your reply shows just how little you actually know about the world outside of your immediate experience.

substistance farmers make on differentation between the maize that they are going to use for animal feed - what a majority of GMO's are produced for - and that which is to be used as a crop.

ie - they buy a shipmet of seed intended to only be used asanimal feed and then plant a proportion of it.

Severian
12th February 2006, 20:11
And what is so awful about that? Has anyone ever been harmed by eating GM corn? Is there any reason to think it's so incredibly dangerous that it needs a whole new set of regulations to make sure none of it is imported accidentally?