Who is the bigger hawk?

[Atlas Swallowed]

http://www.antiwar.com/frank/?articleid=8515

Two war parties, endless war on terror. Not a surprise to most but some still have hope in Hillary. It is false hope. I sent her an e-mail a couple years ago accusing her of being Israels whore. It nice to be wrong in some cases but unfortunatly I had her pegged.

[Severian]

Originally posted by Atlas [email protected] 9 2006, 04:35 PM
I sent her an e-mail a couple years ago accusing her of being Israels whore.
That statement's a good example of the dangers of being too influenced by the "antiwar" ultraright (like antiwar-com, the Buchananite site whose commentary you just linked.) Sexist and promoting the conspiracist view that Israel controls U.S. foreign policy.

But yes, Clinton's a bigger hawk than Bush, on Iran anyway. She's been criticizing Bush for being insufficiently aggressive in denying Iran's sovereign right to develop nuclear energy, and if it chooses, weapons.

[deak]

But yes, Clinton's a bigger hawk than Bush, on Iran anyway. She's been criticizing Bush for being insufficiently aggressive in denying Iran's sovereign right to develop nuclear energy, and if it chooses, weapons.

This has been a Democratic strategy for years now. They aren't against war they just think we should have gone to war with Iran, North Korea, or Suadi Arabia instead. It's an attempt by the Democrats to show they aren't "soft" on national defence by telling people that Bush isn't warring it up with enough or the "right" countries. It's unabashed tripe.

[Atlas Swallowed]

Originally posted by Severian+Feb 9 2006, 11:25 PM--> (Severian @ Feb 9 2006, 11:25 PM)
Atlas [email protected] 9 2006, 04:35 PM
I sent her an e-mail a couple years ago accusing her of being Israels whore.
That statement's a good example of the dangers of being too influenced by the "antiwar" ultraright (like antiwar-com, the Buchananite site whose commentary you just linked.) Sexist and promoting the conspiracist view that Israel controls U.S. foreign policy.

But yes, Clinton's a bigger hawk than Bush, on Iran anyway. She's been criticizing Bush for being insufficiently aggressive in denying Iran's sovereign right to develop nuclear energy, and if it chooses, weapons. [/b]
Was not influenced by anti-war.com. Sent the e-mail before I even heard of anti-war.com. Do not regularly visit it, just happened to be linked to it from a blog I regularly read. What is the conspiracy, who said anything about US foriegn policy being controlled by Israel? All I stated was Hillary is Israels whore, take a look at her voting record and it is obvious. I call Bill O'Reilley a whore on a regular basis does that make me sexist also? Perhaps you are sexist believing women can only be whores.

Reality check. How the hell is Iran going to destroy Hillarys precious racisist state of Israel? Who has a vast nuclear arsenal? Neo-cons on both sides in powerful positions, neo-cons are just slightly biased towards Israel, consiracy theory? no, reality.

I was not aware that Pat Buchanan had anything to do with the site. I feel kind of filthy now. Anti-war right, nice oxy-moron. At least they are against war probably for the wrong reasons but they are a step above Hillary for the fact that they do not want to bomb the piss out of a nation that is no real threat to them.