Log in

View Full Version : Stupid Cappie Column



Krypto-Communist
2nd February 2006, 17:30
I go to a small state school and this moron columnist who has no understanding of public policy or the differentiation between socialism and liberalism, wrote this "scathing" piece denouncing the left. Try not to laugh as hard as I did, but I'd like to see what you all think about this column. Why is he comparing defunct state-capitalist regimes with the United States? It's a common cappie argument and I'm sick of hearing it.



My favorite president of all time was a Democrat. Harry Truman was one of the greatest men to ever hold the highest office of this great country, and beside his name, when running for President both times, was the letter D. Both of my parents were registered Democrats growing up. My grandfather who subsequently walked with shrapnel in his leg for twenty years, after serving in WWII and Vietnam, was a Democrat. The list of great people in my life who at one point proudly called themselves Democrats goes on and on. Yet none of these great people mentioned above would associate their good name with the Democratic party of today.

Democrats in the year 2006 or liberals, as we have come to know them, are at best a mess of good intentions gone very wrong. To say as much is being very generous. The list of reasons as to why I think the Democrat party is out of touch and dangerous is endless. For starters, Democrats of today are a party of fringe and fractured interests, and very few of these interest groups have the wellbeing of the United States in mind. Whether lecturing on the plight of the poor, the needs of the elderly, or the state of education, liberal Democrats and their lengthy speeches are always poor substitutes for even a single useful idea. In truth, most of the social problems we often hear liberals complaining about are societal dilemmas brought about precisely because liberal ideas have had their day, and such ideas have failed miserably. What modern liberals call social issues are, in fact,

Socialist issues.

Read the modern day goals and ideals of Communism and Socialism. The parallels between liberal ideas and that of a modern Socialist or Communist are daunting. If you're really feeling motivated, read some world history and you'll find that socialism and communism have proven to be good, intended disasters.

History has proven over and over again that in an attempt to do good, very bad things often happen. Such Marxist thinking sounds nice as if it will help to pull everyone up to happiness, but what it actually does is pull everyone down to misery. Absolute equality cannot exist. A free people will never be equal and an equal people can never be free, and to say otherwise is merely liberal manipulation that parades itself as generosity, only to spread misery around equally.

American capitalism on the other hand has proven its validity. We are a proven nation of producers, entrepreneurs, and dreamers. America's free enterprise has spawned more advances in science, medicine, technology, agriculture, manufacturing, space exploration and art than any other country in the history of the world. All of this accomplishment is a direct byproduct of the profit-motivated system of capitalism, which is the very system the modern liberal Democrats openly criticize. Yet, unlike Socialism and Marxist communism, under capitalism, financial rewards and personal gratification await those who work hard, take risks, and invest wisely in America.

Liberals cannot see any of this today because they let their self-focused feeling drive their logic. They are far too impressed by their own goodness, to see the damage they are doing. At first glance this doesn't look so bad. After all, aren't Democrats the party fighting for civil rights and the oppressed American? Not hardly. Liberal Democrats today use class and race division as an oppressive way to hold onto a fleeting political base. Today's liberal Democrats are made up largely of fringe and radical interest groups, all fighting for a larger slice of the party's concentration.

To a liberal Democrat, America is to blame for everything. Big business is seen as nothing but exploitive giants to be slain, rather then the lifeblood of our amazing economy. Faith, morals, and God are seen as oppressive and judgmental ideals to be taken out with today's trash. Things like personal responsibility and self-reliance have become PC bad words to a liberal.

Virtually every idea that benefits America and its pursuit of greatness is viewed by today's Democrat as a form of oppression or inequality. Self-loathing liberal Democrats constantly reprimand the country, as if America should somehow apologize for looking out for its own interest.

The democrat party of today is sadly a far cry from the great party it once was.

Although today's Democrats think they have become progressive and intellectually elite, in reality, they have become dangerous and misguided. The party has been hijacked by the worst people our great nation has to offer, and it must return to the wishes and will of the greater majority if it ever again wants to win elections in a true democracy.

Publius
2nd February 2006, 20:14
The first thing I noticed was this:
Democrats in the year 2006 or liberals, as we have come to know them, are at best a mess of good intentions gone very wrong. To say as much is being very generous.

What a horrific writer.

That was one of the most pedestrian 'articles' I've ever had the misfortune of reading.

Please tell me this isn't published.

I look like fucking Joyce compared to this dumbass.

JKP
2nd February 2006, 21:45
Originally posted by [email protected] 2 2006, 12:33 PM
The first thing I noticed was this:
Democrats in the year 2006 or liberals, as we have come to know them, are at best a mess of good intentions gone very wrong. To say as much is being very generous.

What a horrific writer.

That was one of the most pedestrian 'articles' I've ever had the misfortune of reading.

Please tell me this isn't published.

I look like fucking Joyce compared to this dumbass.
You're simply spoiled by the Economist.

Tormented by Treachery
2nd February 2006, 23:42
Misplaced commas and frequent grammatical errors are the least of this man's concern. I agree with Publius (for once :) ) in that this article appears as though it was wrote while the author was on the toilet. Disgusting article.

amanondeathrow
3rd February 2006, 00:15
He's got one thing right:

The party has been hijacked by the worst people our great nation has to offer, and it must return to the wishes and will of the greater majority if it ever again wants to win elections in a true democracy.
Except nowhere in his capitalist dribble dose he ever come close to illustrating the will of the majority of Americans. Who, if properly educated on the subject, would chose socialism over the Republicans any day.

Amusing Scrotum
3rd February 2006, 01:37
Oh dear, what a mess. Still....


Originally posted by moron columnist+--> (moron columnist)My grandfather who subsequently walked with shrapnel in his leg for twenty years, after serving in WWII and Vietnam....[/b]

Well I guess he got the "shrapnel in his leg" in Vietnam, which means the only emotion that this bit of information provokes in me, is sadness....that the bastard didn't get killed.

Anyway, it's nice to know the writers "credentials", the Grandson of a war criminal.


Originally posted by moron columnist+--> (moron columnist)Democrats in the year 2006 or liberals, as we have come to know them....[/b]

Oh no, not the "liberals"! :o

Quite how the Democrats get classified as "liberals" is beyond me.


Originally posted by moron columnist
For starters, Democrats of today are a party of fringe and fractured interests, and very few of these interest groups have the wellbeing of the United States in mind.

Meaningless twaddle.

The United States is not a person with its own "interests". Rather it is a large geographic area populated by many individuals who have individual "interests" and these "interests" have neither a positive or negative impact on the "wellbeing" that is the geographic area which is classified the United States.*

I'd say this guy is a great example of "the creators, [who] have bowed down before their creations." In other words, an idiot!
_____

*Technically, someones who's "interest" was the environment (one way or another) could affect the "wellbeing of the United States".


Originally posted by moron columnist
Read the modern day goals and ideals of Communism and Socialism. The parallels between liberal ideas and that of a modern Socialist or Communist are daunting.

The funny thing about opinion pieces is that you don't need to give any evidence, though it would have supported his case if he'd found some.


Originally posted by moron columnist
If you're really feeling motivated, read some world history....

I'd bet that his knowledge of "world history" is around the same level as my knowledge of advanced algebra. Nil!


Originally posted by moron columnist
History has proven over and over again that in an attempt to do good, very bad things often happen.

We as if you attempt to do "bad" (bomb the shit out Vietnam, install right wing dictators, etc. etc.) you end up doing "bad" every time.

Plus this statement, really does back up my claim about his knowledge of "world history".


Originally posted by moron columnist
Such Marxist thinking sounds nice as if it will help to pull everyone up to happiness....

Occasionally you run across a right wing hack who has actually read Marx, this can't be said of this individual.

As the saying goes, he wouldn't know Marxism from rheumatism. :lol:


Originally posted by moron columnist
....under capitalism, financial rewards and personal gratification await those who work hard, take risks, and invest wisely in America.

What has Paris Hilton done for her millions?


Originally posted by moron columnist
Liberal Democrats today use class and race division as an oppressive way to hold onto a fleeting political base.

I have to admit, I have never heard a "Liberal Democrat" talk bout class, certainly not the working class.


Originally posted by moron columnist
To a liberal Democrat, America is to blame for everything.

Who is "America"? ....and what has "he" done?

Honestly, I think he'd love philosophy, it's as meaningless as him. :lol:


Originally posted by moron columnist
Big business is seen as nothing but exploitive giants to be slain, rather then the lifeblood of our amazing economy.

When have you heard a Democrat say this? :huh:


Originally posted by moron columnist
Faith, morals, and God are seen as oppressive and judgmental ideals to be taken out with today's trash.

That is because they are "oppressive and judgmental [sic] ideals" and they should "be taken out with today's trash."


Originally posted by moron columnist
....as if America should somehow apologize for looking out for its own interest.

Yeah, that's just what the rapist said at his trial, "I was only looking out for my own interest!".


moron [email protected]
The democrat party of today is sadly a far cry from the great party it once was.

I know, those lovely folks from down South who liked to keep slaves and favoured segregation have all gone. How he must miss them.


moron columnist
....and it must return to the wishes and will of the greater majority if it ever again wants to win elections in a true democracy.

Or it could just ask those lovely businessmen for some more donations. :lol:

Publius
3rd February 2006, 01:54
To a liberal Democrat, America is to blame for everything.

Where did this dumbass learn to write?

Seriously?

That teacher deserves to be hanged.

"To be gramatically incorrect, I am"

Moron.

Capitalist Lawyer
3rd February 2006, 02:15
Sure, the article is poorly written and please note that our young commie friend here has pointed out that he is a university student so that means the columnist in question has to be atleast in his early 20's or late teens. So cut the poor guy some slack; I'm sure the Economist writers and other columnists were in his shoes at one point in time?

But atleast he is right about the leftists in the USA and how they seem to see capitalism and America as the ultimate evil in the world. You guys on the left are too hasty to point out the USA's mistakes and misfortunes while always leaving out the postive accomplishements this country and its western liberal capitalist counterparts have achieved.

Paris Hilton? Is that the best anecdotal evidence you can give Armchair? What about all of the working-class and "poor" who have worked their way atleast into the outer fringes of the middle-class? Sure, not everybody can be a millionaire or make six-figures but most CAN make a modest living and there are plenty of opportunities for them to achieve that.

Can you communists say anything good about western capitalist countries?

And I'll admit, it is pretty stupid of him to compare the USA to the USSR or possibly even Cuba. The USA has never been invaded by any outside forces nor bombed into smithereens which is why the Soviet Union was so behind the West in terms of advancement.

Publius
3rd February 2006, 02:21
Sure, the article is poorly written and please note that our young commie friend here has pointed out that he is a university student so that means the columnist in question has to be atleast in his early 20's or late teens. So cut the poor guy some slack; I'm sure the Economist writers and other columnists were in his shoes at one point in time?

If he's in college, than I'm younger than him.

I would say that more than a few of the posters in this thread are college aged or so.

Youth is not an excuse for poor writing. If you aren't a good writer, don't write.

I mean, write to get better at writing, but don't publish your works.

I don't think I'm a very good poet, so you don't see me going around trying to get my shitty poems published, do you?

Amusing Scrotum
3rd February 2006, 02:23
Originally posted by Capitalist Lawyer+--> (Capitalist Lawyer)Paris Hilton? Is that the best anecdotal evidence you can give Armchair?[/b]

I admit, I am a "petty bastard". :lol:


Capitalist Lawyer
What about all of the working-class and "poor" who have worked their way atleast into the outer fringes of the middle-class?

Well the "middle-class" is not an "elastic band". There are only so many people that can be in it at a given period, meaning that for every one person who moves "up", another person moves "down".

Plus, I like how you say the "outer fringes". Like they stopped having to eat shit on weekdays, but still had to eat it on the weekends. :lol:

amanondeathrow
3rd February 2006, 02:34
But atleast he is right about the leftists in the USA and how they seem to see capitalism and America as the ultimate evil in the world.
This is true, most true leftists view Capitalism as the ultimate negative force in our world. But Democrats do not, if fact they are a staunch supporter of the status quo and only show any sings pointing the other direction when they are forced to by low opinion polls. They are closer to the Republicans then they are to anyone who posts on this site (except for you maybe). That is one of the main problems (besides the piss poor grammar), he seems to views democrats as being leftist.

You guys on the left are too hasty to point out the USA's mistakes and misfortunes while always leaving out the postive accomplishements this country and its western liberal capitalist counterparts have achieved.
And you seem to be so quick to condemn us for failing to mention US "achievements", while ignoring the extremely bias media, which twists anything it can to the US's favor.

Can you communists say anything good about western capitalist countries?
No

And I'll admit, it is pretty stupid of him to compare the USA to the USSR or possibly even Cuba.
Your damn right

Capitalist Lawyer
3rd February 2006, 02:42
If he's in college, than I'm younger than him.

Wow, a 16 yr old who has a hard on for Von Mises and a subscription to the Economist?

So that means you'll turn 52 next year right?



Youth is not an excuse for poor writing. If you aren't a good writer, don't write.

Are you sure you're not playing Devils Advocate on this board? Are you really the 16 yr old ardent capitalist supporter or are you a communist like the rest of them just trying to spark debate?


I mean, write to get better at writing, but don't publish your works.

It's only a college newspaper, not the NY Times. Anybody can get published in a college newspaper. A patch of grass with squirrell shit on it resembling the school's mascot will get front page news.


I don't think I'm a very good poet, so you don't see me going around trying to get my shitty poems published, do you?

Well, that's a defeatist attitude wouldn't you say?


Well the "middle-class" is not an "elastic band". There are only so many people that can be in it at a given period, meaning that for every one person who moves "up", another person moves "down".

The "finite pie theory" is bullshit, proof? Our standard of living keeps improving!


Plus, I like how you say the "outer fringes". Like they stopped having to eat shit on weekdays, but still had to eat it on the weekends.

Will you please address my claim Armchair? Better yet, address some of the claims in the column and in my post. Let's not hijack this thread with petty insults.

amanondeathrow
3rd February 2006, 02:47
Are you sure you're not playing Devils Advocate on this board? Are you really the 16 yr old ardent capitalist supporter or are you a communist like the rest of them just trying to spark debate?
I agree, it may be a shitty article, but if all your going to do is make cracks about his grammatical skills then your serving no purpose in this debate.

Publius
3rd February 2006, 02:53
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 3 2006, 03:01 AM




Are you sure you're not playing Devils Advocate on this board? Are you really the 16 yr old ardent capitalist supporter or are you a communist like the rest of them just trying to spark debate?

Nah.

I've actually thought of doing this in reverse though, coming in and playing a communist.

I think I could pull it off, easily, though I would have to tone down the mellifluousness of my writing, it's a dead givaway.

:lol:


It's only a college newspaper, not the NY Times. Anybody can get published in a college newspaper. A patch of grass with squirrell shit on it resembling the school's mascot will get front page news.


What college is this, Dipshit State?



Well, that's a defeatist attitude wouldn't you say?

Not really.

I actually think I'm a decent poet, I was just being humble.

:lol:

Publius
3rd February 2006, 02:55
I agree, it may be a shitty article, but if all your going to do is make cracks about his grammatical skills then your serving no purpose in this debate.

Are you reffering to me?

If you are, kindly don't.

I'll serve whatever purpose I deign to serve.

amanondeathrow
3rd February 2006, 03:18
Are you reffering to me?

If you are, kindly don't.

I'll serve whatever purpose I deign to serve.
Then why don’t you kindly stop wasting space with your arrogant banter. This board is meant for discussion, not for you to show how well educated you are (To tell you the truth I find your writing style rather pedestrian).

P.S. its spelled referring

Tormented by Treachery
3rd February 2006, 05:34
Well, haven't we descended into a petty pissing match.

As odd as it may seem, I still do agree with Publius: if you can not write in a such a manner as to accurately convey the meanings of your works, they how can you possibly write something of worth? If I see a writer who will not take the effort to present his or her material in a respectable manner, then I immediately wonder how hard the writer worked on developing the thought in the first place. His age is also of no weight: I'm 16, and his scratches are deplorable.

That said, let us not spend time arguing about each other, but rather the issue.

Seong
3rd February 2006, 05:41
Lol at Armchair Socialism.

And which class do you belong to Capitalist Lawyer?
I agree, it's really great that the poor can move more easily to the outer fringes of the middle class. When they're pushed back down to the outer fringes of poverty they'll be able to look back and say: "You know, life was really great when I could afford toilet paper and didn't have to use my socks to wipe my arse."

Good times, good times.

amanondeathrow
3rd February 2006, 10:51
As odd as it may seem, I still do agree with Publius: if you can not write in a such a manner as to accurately convey the meanings of your works, they how can you possibly write something of worth?
I am not trying to claim that the article was written well (we can all agree that it was most surly not). But only focusing on the article’s grammar, without even mentioning the ideas within the article is useless and arrogant. There is no need for it in an organized discussion.

Hegemonicretribution
3rd February 2006, 15:02
Originally posted by [email protected] 3 2006, 03:12 AM
I've actually thought of doing this in reverse though, coming in and playing a communist.

I think I could pull it off, easily, though I would have to tone down the mellifluousness of my writing, it's a dead givaway.

I suggested having a thread for this a while back, but there was no interest. It is a pitty because I feel there is much to be gained from truly learning an opposing view to your own.


What college is this, Dipshit State?
I don't really care about trivial details of grammer and the like, but of an educated person writing seriously? The disregard for rules of grammer seem to mirror the diregard for logic or reason.

All in all I don't think it was as bad as some people imply. It is written for a specific audience, and they are the ones that already agree with this fool, and appreciate their view being published. Any one on the left or the right with the smallest amount of intelligence could see right through this.

Publius
3rd February 2006, 19:44
Then why don’t you kindly stop wasting space with your arrogant banter.

Because any other kind of banter would be boring.



This board is meant for discussion, not for you to show how well educated you are (To tell you the truth I find your writing style rather pedestrian).

This thread was clearly created to ridicule this moron.

Note the title of the thread.

I am 'discussing' how much of a dumbass this guy is, with my 'comrades' here.

Or at least I was until I was rudely interrupted by your misquote.

Obvious and flagrant violations of the most basic tenets of the English language, I think, demonstrate a general ignorance and thus deserve mention in this, or any debate on the essay.

There were actually times where he was so ungrammatical that you couldn't actually discern his meaning.

I don't see how you are in any position to judge me, anyway. Who are you and what makes you so fucking special?

And I would say that 'pedestrian' is a poor word to use as my prose is anything but a dull. A better word would be 'consequential'.

'Pedestrian' denotes that my prose is ordinary, which it most clearly is not. It's quite a bit above the ordinary in terms of grammatical flair and advanced vocabulary.

I'm not a perfect writer by any means, but I am an interesting writer.




P.S. its spelled referring

I'll make a note of it.

violencia.Proletariat
3rd February 2006, 20:45
But atleast he is right about the leftists in the USA and how they seem to see capitalism and America as the ultimate evil in the world.

Leftists IN THE USA! That's exactly right. The US is unopposed as an imperialist power. Since those living in the US do not suffer repression from a foreign imperialist power, their greatest enemy is OBVIOUSLY going to be their own government. Why? Because it's what governs them.


Can you communists say anything good about western capitalist countries?

YES! Im glad America is not stuck in semi-fuedalism! :lol:


The USA has never been invaded by any outside forces

The war of 1812 ring a bell?

Capitalist Lawyer
4th February 2006, 17:10
It's funny how this thread has turned into nothing but a "I'm better than this guy" thread and yet, none of you have provided an intelligent critique of this guy's article.

Hegemonicretribution
4th February 2006, 17:36
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 4 2006, 05:29 PM
It's funny how this thread has turned into nothing but a "I'm better than this guy" thread and yet, none of you have provided an intelligent critique of this guy's article.
It is funny how you have provided a criticism of the members posting, rather than the article.

The article does not require an intelligent critique, a critique will suffice. That is to say that it is almost self evident (consider the audience) why this article was a joke. You have been here long enough to know some of the instinctive responses to this sort of thing; you can't have a communist state etc.. To understand this thread as another arena for this is to misunderstand what was being attempted.

The article was not written as a serious argument, or at least I hope it wasn't. It was an appeal, to those with whom the author agreed, acting under the guise of an actual criticism of something that within certain circles does not need to be criticised. This was written more for people that share the oppinion, than as a persuasive piece for those on the fence.

In this thread we were mocking this on two counts; primarily we (in the most part) already disagree with what we read, without reading it. Upon reading it, it turned out to be comical in terms of the sub-par writing, both factually, and grammatically.

Secondly, as fans of the art of debate (Opposing ideologies), such a poor version of an argument is humorous on this count alone. Even for those such as Publius with whom most of us strongly disagree.

So whether or not we were attacking it for its line of argument through its poor structure, or just in terms of its structure does not matter.

What does matter is that I have sent far to long trying to convince you that we weren't even really supposed to criticise this because it isn't necessary. :blink:

Amusing Scrotum
4th February 2006, 17:37
Originally posted by Capitalist Lawyer+Feb 3 2006, 03:01 AM--> (Capitalist Lawyer @ Feb 3 2006, 03:01 AM)
Well the "middle-class" is not an "elastic band". There are only so many people that can be in it at a given period, meaning that for every one person who moves "up", another person moves "down".

The "finite pie theory" is bullshit, proof? Our standard of living keeps improving![/b]

So if ten bin-men all become shopkeepers, there are no longer any bin-men?

That you use "standard of living" as the deciding factor in determining "class". Only goes to prove your own ignorance.


Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected]
Will you please address my claim Armchair?

What "claims[s]"? ....the only "claim[s]" you've made, I've adressed....

http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php...st&p=1292014092 (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=45784&view=findpost&p=1292014092)

Okay? :)


Capitalist Lawyer
It's funny how this thread has turned into nothing but a "I'm better than this guy" thread and yet, none of you have provided an intelligent critique of this guy's article.

I suppose it is the decision of the reader as to whether they find this....

http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php...st&p=1292014064 (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=45784&view=findpost&p=1292014064)

....an "intelligent critique".

amanondeathrow
5th February 2006, 02:45
This thread was clearly created to ridicule this moron.
No, the purpose of this thread is to discus and critique the moron's article. A few jokes about his horrible grammatical skills are fine, as long as you actually have some intelligent comments to go along with them, which you clearly do not. I agree I may have overreacted, but at least I posted something which actually added to the discussion. I think it would be best if we just ended this little side argument now and stop wasting everyone's time.
P.S. I am glad you have considered taking more care in the future to spell correctly.

Publius
5th February 2006, 15:51
No, the purpose of this thread is to discus and critique the moron's article.

'Discus'?


P.S. I am glad you have considered taking more care in the future to spell correctly.

:rolleyes:

But seriously, a thread entitled 'stupid cappie column' is obviously derisive in nature and clearly meant to ridicule the 'cappie'.

'Discussion' would merely be an ancillary effect.



A few jokes about his horrible grammatical skills are fine, as long as you actually have some intelligent comments to go along with them, which you clearly do not.

What's there really to say?



I agree I may have overreacted, but at least I posted something which actually added to the discussion.

When the 'discussion' starts at such a low level, there isn't much you can do to 'add' to it.



I think it would be best if we just ended this little side argument now and stop wasting everyone's time.


Certainly.

Krypto-Communist
6th February 2006, 18:48
I wrote to this author and this is what he had to say. Notice how doesn't back up his claims but rather brags about his accomplishments in regards to serving the American Empire?




I want to thank you for your interest in my piece. I can see from your reply that you think very highly of your own intellectual prowess. I found it strange that you would assume to know so much about me simply by reading a few opinions in a college paper. I found it stranger still that you would spend so much of your reply insulting me personally. I suppose I will however have yield to the apparent academic crime of majoring in Broadcast Communication. Allow me to humbly surrender to your scholastic superiority and let it go at that. How is the study of history on the undergraduate level treating you by the way? I hear there are big bucks in that racket. Good luck with that.


I find it strange when people accuse conservative minded people of being talk radio clones. My guess is that it makes you feel better to think that we conservatives are all indoctrinated and brainwashed by a bunch of Clear Cannel shock jocks that make their living peddling fear. I don’t from the sound of your reply expect you would believe this but I seldom listen to talk radio and have very little respect for those involved.

I am making a bet however that you have several conservative talk radio stations programmed to your car-radio-presets even as you’re reading this. And that little bite of delicious irony has me and my friends laughing our asses off. Its liberal (gluttons for punishment) like yourself that give those guys such high ratings. (Just a little tip from a small minded Comm. major)

On the small chance that you really care… Along with attending college full time, I have served for more then four years in the United States Air Force and have completed two honorable tours of duty in Iraq. I have travel extensively in Europe and the Middle East and have lived on both coasts.

Upon the completion of my studies here at Millersville I will be a officer in the Air Force, own two homes and have a degree in Electrical engineering from the Community college of the Air Force along side my measly Broadcast Communication accomplishments. I tell you this not out of pride but that you might open your mind to the possibility that there are those of us out there who take an honest look at the world around us and genuinely disagree with people like yourself. Despite what your professors tell you in their daily defense of nonsense, you and you kin don’t have the market cornered on the truth.

I will have to respectfully pay your suggestion that I stop writing no mind. After all I am certain now that I have gotten under your skin, and even more certain that mine will be the first article you read from now on.

By the way why does a meaningless opinion piece from a mindless Communication undergrad, get your patties in such a bunch anyway? Don’t you have history to read?

Sincerely and in great haste,

Tormented by Treachery
6th February 2006, 20:55
Respond again, simply point out every single error he made factually, as well as grammatically. Then throw in the fact that instead of killing women and children, he should've better spent his time learning how to write :). Finally, plead, again, for him to write about a subject he has knowledge in -- perhaps torture?