Originally posted by
[email protected] 8 2006, 01:16 PM
Yes there where a few right wingers in the mensheviks but martov only kept them because the Bolsheviks had restricted free press and there where no right wing papers etc and Martov was a fond believer in everyone having there say.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Martov led one of the smaller factions of the Mensheviks, and was in no position to say who could or could not "stay."
On the other hand, he chose to stay in their party. No matter what they did, he remained united with them. But the second the Soviets - the elected representatives of the workers, soldiers and peasants - decided for the Bolshevik Party, he walked out. (In the October 1917 Congress of Soviets.)
Martov had some positive qualities and played a positive role at some points in history. But what can you say about somebody who values unity with the worst of sellouts over unity with the majority of working people?
In Lenin's time, the Soviet government banned only those parties which took up arms against it; that's why Martov was able to remain operating legally for a long time after other Mensheviks were banned. At one point, when a group of Right Socialist-Revolutionaries decided they'd been wrong to support the armed counterrevolution; Lenin advocated they should be unbanned.
I think it's pretty hypocritical to complain about that policy. I doubt most of those who complain about it would be that tolerant under similar circumstances; few capitalist regimes are.
im confused im anti-USA government as much as you people.
You sure are confused. Who cares how "anti-USA government" or anti-anything else you are? What matters is what you're for.