Log in

View Full Version : The Strike is Over



which doctor
22nd December 2005, 21:24
It looks like once again, the unions have caved.

Transit Workers Agree to End Strike; Talks Continue (Update9)

Dec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Striking subway and bus workers in New York City ended a three-day walkout today.

Transport Workers Union Local 100 leaders agreed to call off the strike while negotiations on a contract resume, said Richard Curreri, a state mediator. The union's board voted 36-5 with two abstentions this afternoon to accept the return-to- work plan, board member Eladio Diaz said.

Between 10 and 18 hours will be needed to get the city's subways and buses running normally again, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority said on its Web site. Mayor Michael Bloomberg said some buses will be back on the streets tonight and ``hopefully most subways'' will be open by the morning.

``Both parties have a genuine desire to resolve their differences,'' said Curreri, director of conciliation for the State Public Employment Relations Board. ``They have agreed to resume negotiations while the TWU takes steps toward returning its membership to work.''

Union leaders faced fines and possible jail time when they agreed to move to end the strike, New York's first transit shutdown in 25 years. Without public transportation, which normally carries 7 million riders a day, New Yorkers were forced to carpool, walk, bike and share cabs to work, or stay home.

New York's economy may have lost $1 billion over the three days, according to preliminary estimates by city officials.

`Economic Harm'

``This was a great test for our city,'' Bloomberg said t a City Hall news conference after the end of the strike was announced. ``This was a great test for our city. We passed the test with flying colors. It wasn't easy, and certainly serious economic harm was inflicted.''

The mayor added, ``let us hope we can salvage the rest of our week,'' noting there will be two more shopping days until Christmas.

The union was under ``tremendous pressure'' to end the strike because of fines, lost pay and public opinion, said Peter Panken, a lawyer with Epstein Becker & Green who represented a Westchester County company in negotiations with the union earlier this year.

``From the public relations standpoint, I think the union has had a disaster, because everybody forced to get to work is having difficulty,'' Panken said. ``The public is mad beyond belief.''

Thanks

Union president Roger Toussaint announced the vote of his board to end the strike at 3 p.m. ``We thank the riders for their patience and forbearance,'' said Toussaint in a brief statement.

The largest mass transit system in the U.S. came to a standstill Dec. 20 when the 32,000-member Local 100 rejected a three-year MTA contract offer that called for new employees to contribute more of their wages to a pension plan.

Formal negotiations will be scheduled ``in short order,'' Curreri said. The MTA's pension proposal is still on the table, along with possible changes in health benefits, he said.

The mediator's announcement at 11 a.m. came as top union officials, including Toussaint, were scheduled to appear before a Brooklyn judge on possible contempt charges that could have brought jail time and fines of $1,000 a day each.

Fines

A state law prohibiting walkouts by public employees penalizes strikers two days' pay for every day of work missed. In addition, State Supreme Court Justice Theodore Jones fined the union $1 million for each day of the walkout, and city officials today were planning to press a separate suit for millions in damages.

Jones postponed the hearing until 4 p.m. as the plan to end the walkout was announced. Darren Dopp, a spokesman for New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, said the fines ``still stand. That's the law.''

Curreri said a ``media blackout'' will be imposed as an aid to the negotiations. ``There have been assorted leaks of various varieties,'' he said. ``It tends to be one step forward, two or three steps back with these type of things.''

Curreri said he couldn't identify a turning point in the marathon talks leading to the agreement.

``I can't tell you what the magic is,'' he said. ``You basically sit with both parties and attempt to get them focused on the issues and less focused on the strike, which stands in the way of the parties' taking more rational views.''

Left in Cold

The strike forced workers, shoppers, schoolchildren and visitors to find alternative transportation amid frigid weather, and hurting holiday sales at the city's retailers.

Passengers displaced from city buses and subways waited at times for hours at Pennsylvania Station and other commuter rail terminals to use suburban trains making limited city stops. Cars with fewer than four people were barred from entering the heart of Manhattan during the morning rush hour, and taxi drivers were permitted to fill their cabs with passengers going to more than one destination.

The announcement came a day after Toussaint, Governor George Pataki, and Bloomberg traded angry accusations over the strike.

Bloomberg called union leaders ``selfish,'' ``greedy'' and ``thuggish'' for ``claiming to be the champions of working families when the illegal actions are taking or costing New Yorkers their livelihoods.''

Toussaint said, ``We are not thugs, we are not greedy'' and that he was defending his workers' right.

Relief

New Yorkers welcomed news of the strike's conclusion.

``It's really good,'' said Kevin Distel, 39, who was walking in Central Park when told the strike was over. ``Judging from the press conference yesterday, I thought it was getting personal but cooler heads have apparently prevailed. I thought it was going to go a long time, at least until Friday.''

The last strike in 1980 lasted 11 days.

Local 100's parent, the Transport Workers Union of America, refused to support the strike, and national president Mike O'Brien urged the workers to return to the their jobs.

Union and MTA negotiators returned early this morning to a midtown hotel for their first face-to-face meeting since talks broke off Dec. 19.

In its last offer before the strike, the MTA offered a three-year contract with raises of 3 percent, 4 percent and 3.5 percent through 2008. The transit agency, whose board is dominated by Pataki appointees, also agreed to retain the union's full pension eligibility age at 55, on condition new hires contribute 6 percent of their wages toward pensions, up from the 2 percent members currently pay.

Subway operators earned an average of $62,438 a year, including overtime, under the previous three-year contract, the MTA said. Train conductors averaged $53,000, subway booth clerks $50,720, and bus drivers $62,551.

The mayor is founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent Bloomberg LP.

To contact the reporters on this story:
Chris Dolmetsch in New York at [email protected];
Josh P. Hamilton in New York at [email protected]

Last Updated: December 22, 2005 15:44 EST

Original Link Here (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aSr_ptM9LehQ&refer=us#)

Sigh, another defeat.

Seeker
22nd December 2005, 23:03
Are the workers gonna listen to the Union leaders and just give up?

GoaRedStar
22nd December 2005, 23:09
they already did

More Fire for the People
22nd December 2005, 23:10
I had doubts of the strike when I saw this
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...t_strikers.jpeg (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Image-2005_NYC_transit_strikers.jpeg)

Rather than this
http://www.kantipuronline.com/admin/news/upload/Valley%20Bandh%20in%20Pictures/two.jpg

RedJacobin
22nd December 2005, 23:15
Originally posted by Fist of [email protected] 22 2005, 09:24 PM
Sigh, another defeat.
how about we wait for the settlement before making a judgement?

LuĂ­s Henrique
22nd December 2005, 23:24
I would say just managing to keep the strike during three days, though it was declared illegal, is an impressive victory. I can't tell whether the role of the union bosses was really combative, but even if not, the rank and file showed they could push them into fighting. And if they effectively betrayed the movement, certainly the rank and file have made an important political experience. Let's now see the further developments.

Luís Henrique

RedJacobin
22nd December 2005, 23:33
Originally posted by Luís [email protected] 22 2005, 11:24 PM
I would say just managing to keep the strike during three days, though it was declared illegal, is an impressive victory. I can't tell whether the role of the union bosses was really combative, but even if not, the rank and file showed they could push them into fighting. And if they effectively betrayed the movement, certainly the rank and file have made an important political experience. Let's now see the further developments.

Luís Henrique
that seems like a good assessment.

the bourgeois press is going to start issuing all sorts of pronouncements soon about how "the strike was a complete failure" and how "the workers just 'inconvenienced the public' for no point." they're going to try to discourage more workers' fightbacks.

the left is going to have to counter that.

bolshevik butcher
23rd December 2005, 00:04
The fact that the strike happened in itself showed bravery and courage form the workers. It will be rpesented as defeat but it's importanat that the workers themselves can see what has happened. I doubt taht all the New Yorkers are furious with them. The taxi drivers agreed to help them according to a report i saw. Events like these can help to create understanding and a new mood among workers.

On the negotitaions. This action amy help the union, It will show that the workers are determined and possibly unwilling to compromise for a low offer.

Zeitgeizt
23rd December 2005, 03:26
New York's economy may have lost $1 billion over the three days, according to preliminary estimates by city officials.


Good. When corporations, and business suffer I smile. It just goes to show the working class how powerful they are, and how useful calling strikes can be in the future.


I doubt that all the New Yorkers are furious with them.

I'm a native New Yorker and I can tell you...I think they vote democrat out of sheer habbit. Most are reactionary as can be at heart - especially on the island.

GoaRedStar
23rd December 2005, 03:46
Actually right here in Harlem it seem like most people were sympathizing with the striker

Zeitgeizt
23rd December 2005, 06:29
Yeah but that's Harlem :)

Guerrilla22
23rd December 2005, 07:16
Bad news for Unions in the US. I wish they would have held out longer.

bolshevik butcher
23rd December 2005, 12:02
I dont think it is bad news. They've succeded in shutting down the enture transport network under severe pressure for 3days, and had sympathy from people un workign class areas like Harlem. That sounds like an achievemen to me. It could be the beggining of a new age of militancy in America.

which doctor
23rd December 2005, 14:28
I would have liked to see the strike go for a few more days. Past christmas would be nice.

RedJacobin
23rd December 2005, 14:49
Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 03:46 AM
Actually right here in Harlem it seem like most people were sympathizing with the striker
here's something interesting...support for the strike broken down by nationality:

23% of white residents in NYC supported the strike
44% of Latino residents supported it
61% of African American residents supported it

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/brandt221205.html

cccpcommie
23rd December 2005, 14:55
Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 06:29 AM
Yeah but that's Harlem :)
umm yea it is..u know, they are not the "upper class"..they are just like u and me they try to work for a living..people from places like harlem are our back bone :)

Nothing Human Is Alien
23rd December 2005, 15:38
Every poll showed wide spread support for the strikers; and yet, at the same time, every piece in the media did nothing but quote petty bourgeois business men who were talking shit.

A comrade in NYC sent me the results of a poll printed in the Daily News (who was openly hostile to the strikers!) that showed the vast maority of New Yorkers supporting the strike.

Simotix
23rd December 2005, 19:07
Originally posted by Zeitgeizt+Dec 23 2005, 03:26 AM--> (Zeitgeizt @ Dec 23 2005, 03:26 AM)

New York's economy may have lost $1 billion over the three days, according to preliminary estimates by city officials.


Good. When corporations, and business suffer I smile. It just goes to show the working class how powerful they are, and how useful calling strikes can be in the future.[/b]
Goes to show how powerful the working class is, and also shows how little the coprtations care.

I was hoping to strike would last past Christmas, or even past New Years. Imagen all the tourists trying to get to the Ball Drop? So much tourism revenue would have been lost.


Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 02:55 PM

[email protected] 23 2005, 06:29 AM
Yeah but that's Harlem :)
umm yea it is..u know, they are not the "upper class"..they are just like u and me they try to work for a living..people from places like harlem are our back bone :)
Some rich people have had shops in Harlem. Roy Campanella (Famous black Baseball Player, one of the first in MLB) for one has a liquor store in Harlem. The people that worked for him said he was a very kind and caring person.

Jazzy
23rd December 2005, 19:37
Maybe the workers will get what they want since the city has now seen what a mess and how much the strike cost them.....

Ownthink
23rd December 2005, 19:38
Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 02:37 PM
Maybe the workers will get what they want since the city has now seen what a mess and how much the strike cost them.....
I woudn&#39;t count on it <_<

Simotix
23rd December 2005, 20:00
Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 07:37 PM
Maybe the workers will get what they want since the city has now seen what a mess and how much the strike cost them.....
:lol: :lol: Although they change their mind a lot, they will find one reason or another so that the workers are still not going to get what they want.