US Troops bemoan not being able to kill Iraqi Kids

[JKP]

The youth of Iraq is welcoming their saviours with open arms and flowers!

Time for a reality check.



http://m90.org/index.php?id=9827

I like the part when the kid says "fuck you".

[Correa]

Yes! We have spread democracy! Yes! :lol:

[Zingu]

I love that video! Kid power all the way! :P

[Free Palestine]

Don't feel sorry for the kids. They are all senior aides to Zarqawi, didn't you know? A news channel the other day reported that the US was able to kill some 20 "senior aides" to Zarqawi over the last two years. So Zarqawi has more "senior aides" than Bush, Napoleon, and Bill Gates?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Why are you kidding yourself? Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks. Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

If I was a US soldier in the area, I would be weary of approaching kids too.

Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.

[Ownthink]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 12:56 PM
Why are you kidding yourself? Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks. Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

If I was a US soldier in the area, I would be weary of approaching kids too.

Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.
:lol:

Too bad the truck didn't hit an IED on the way out.

Or at least some gunfire hitting the truck, something...

[Free Palestine]

Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks.

Evidence?


Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

Source?


Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.

Yeah, because unlike them.. you've actually been in "combat."

Oh wait, no you haven't. You're just a chicken-hawk coward. :)

[Elect Marx]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 12:56 PM
Why are you kidding yourself? Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks. Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

If I was a US soldier in the area, I would be weary of approaching kids too.

Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.
All good point and I agree. We should apply this line of thinking to the terrorists in our nation too, if kids throw rocks at your car, you should be able to shoot them.
I don't see why we cannot mount turrets on our cars and gun the "little shits" down in the streets everywhere. Hell, preemptive strikes are good everywhere but especially if the kids are foreign or brown. [/bigoted rant]

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Ownthink+Dec 16 2005, 06:22 PM--> (Ownthink @ Dec 16 2005, 06:22 PM)
Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 12:56 PM
Why are you kidding yourself? Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks. Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

If I was a US soldier in the area, I would be weary of approaching kids too.

Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.
:lol:

Too bad the truck didn't hit an IED on the way out.

Or at least some gunfire hitting the truck, something... [/b]
You are sad.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 16 2005, 07:46 PM

Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks.

Evidence?


Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

Source?


Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.

Yeah, because unlike them.. you've actually been in "combat."

Oh wait, no you haven't. You're just a chicken-hawk coward. :)

Evidence? Source?

Why are you wasting time being petty like this? Why don't you just ask for evidence that the sky is blue?



Yeah, because unlike them.. you've actually been in "combat."

Oh wait, no you haven't. You're just a chicken-hawk coward. :)

You continue to expose your utter cluelessness.

Why don't you enlighten us and discuss my experience and life history.

[Free Palestine]

Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by 313C7 iVi4RX+Dec 16 2005, 07:55 PM--> (313C7 iVi4RX @ Dec 16 2005, 07:55 PM)
Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 12:56 PM
Why are you kidding yourself? Third world insurgents often employ children to carry out their attacks. Vietnamese often booby trapped infant babies with grenades.

If I was a US soldier in the area, I would be weary of approaching kids too.

Some leftists are truly naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone.
All good point and I agree. We should apply this line of thinking to the terrorists in our nation too, if kids throw rocks at your car, you should be able to shoot them.
I don't see why we cannot mount turrets on our cars and gun the "little shits" down in the streets everywhere. Hell, preemptive strikes are good everywhere but especially if the kids are foreign or brown. [/bigoted rant] [/b]
I don't agree with this analogy.

I reality, if a kid throws a rock in this country, I wouldn't be predisposed to think it may be a grenade or IED.

In Iraq, such an assumption is legitimate.

If someone, regardless of age, throws and object at a US soldier in a hot combat zone, then retalitory force is more than justfied.

Don't you agree that this is reasonable?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 16 2005, 08:15 PM
Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible.

[Dark Exodus]

Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Dec 16 2005, 08:20 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Dec 16 2005, 08:20 PM)
Free [email protected] 16 2005, 08:15 PM
Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible. [/b]
Enlighten us as to where you served, CI.

[Free Palestine]

Originally posted by CI
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible.

I think it's the other way around, buddy. :rolleyes:

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Dark Exodus+Dec 16 2005, 08:26 PM--> (Dark Exodus @ Dec 16 2005, 08:26 PM)
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 08:20 PM

Free [email protected] 16 2005, 08:15 PM
Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible.
Enlighten us as to where you served, CI. [/b]
I don't have to prove crap to you. I'm comfortable with my service to my country, and will not cow-tow to you.

I will certainly not discuss it with the likes of you pukes, you don't deserve it.

[Elect Marx]

Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Dec 16 2005, 03:20 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Dec 16 2005, 03:20 PM)
Free [email protected] 16 2005, 08:15 PM
Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible. [/b]
Alright; so why aren't you off to Iraq to die then? Too important to die for your beloved flag? That is how it goes with most patriots...


I don't agree with this analogy.

I reality, if a kid throws a rock in this country, I wouldn't be predisposed to think it may be a grenade or IED.

In Iraq, such an assumption is legitimate.

If someone, regardless of age, throws and object at a US soldier in a hot combat zone, then retalitory force is more than justfied.

Don't you agree that this is reasonable?

I wouldn't blame you for shooting, if you where shot at. Oh wait, now are they helping those people in the first place or are they just there to control them for US (ruling class) interests? On second thought, they deserve to have rocks thrown at them, maybe it will illustrate Bush's point of how welcome "liberators" are there.

If you throw rocks at innocent people, it might not be such an issue (still shooting seems a bit extreme?). If you throw rocks at an invasion force, all the more power to you.

I liked the "fuck you," someone shouted at the vehicle :D

[Andy Bowden]

CI why do you think Iraqi kids would throw things at the US troops anyway - if they are as you claim welcomed as Liberators?

[Dark Exodus]

Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Dec 16 2005, 08:28 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Dec 16 2005, 08:28 PM)
Originally posted by Dark [email protected] 16 2005, 08:26 PM

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 08:20 PM

Free [email protected] 16 2005, 08:15 PM
Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible.
Enlighten us as to where you served, CI.
I don't have to prove crap to you. I'm comfortable with my service to my country, and will not cow-tow to you.

I will certainly not discuss it with the likes of you pukes, you don't deserve it. [/b]

Do not make claims if you do not intend to back them up, especially with such a terrible evasion as that.

If you talk 'crap' then you have to prove 'crap',

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Dark Exodus+Dec 16 2005, 08:37 PM--> (Dark Exodus @ Dec 16 2005, 08:37 PM)
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 08:28 PM

Originally posted by Dark [email protected] 16 2005, 08:26 PM

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 08:20 PM

Free [email protected] 16 2005, 08:15 PM
Seriously, I find it utterly hilarious how CI yabbers on about how leftists are allegedly "naive about the realities of a third-world urban warzone" .. as if he's ever seen combat. Uh, CI, you were and are a chicken-hawk coward, you've never been within 10,000 miles of combat and you know it you pussy. Your niche is to cheerlead wars from your chair supporting warmongering policies. I'd like to see you be the good little Bushie boot-licker you are and grab his deer rifle and catch the next plane to Iraq. I think we'd all have a great laugh when if you'd catch a bullet in the face.
LOL,LOL, ROFL, LMAO

You have no idea what you are talking about. You just continue to make yourself stupider and stupider.

If that is possible.
Enlighten us as to where you served, CI.
I don't have to prove crap to you. I'm comfortable with my service to my country, and will not cow-tow to you.

I will certainly not discuss it with the likes of you pukes, you don't deserve it.

Do not make claims if you do not intend to back them up, especially with such a terrible evasion as that.

If you talk 'crap' then you have to prove 'crap', [/b]
I wasn't talking crap, I was responding to someone elses assumption about me. I didn't offer this information in the 1st place. I was simply answering FP.

Thus, why should I discuss it?

[Free Palestine]

You have done more than enough already, CI. :D I think it is crystal clear to everyone that I was right on every one of my claims - as evidenced by your continued evasion of the subject. You can't refuse to confront the truth any longer, chicken-hawk coward. Pathetic..

Keep sinking your tiny chicken-hawk beak into Bush's ass, pussy. :lol:

[Ownthink]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 16 2005, 04:21 PM
You have done more than enough already, CI. :D I think it is crystal clear to everyone that I was right on every one of my claims - as evidenced by your continued evasion of the subject. You can't refuse to confront the truth any longer, chicken-hawk coward. Pathetic..

Keep sinking your tiny chicken-hawk beak into Bush's ass, pussy. :lol:
Ha, you're on a roll :lol:

[Intifada]

CI, quit digging and drop the spade.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 16 2005, 09:21 PM
You have done more than enough already, CI. :D I think it is crystal clear to everyone that I was right on every one of my claims - as evidenced by your continued evasion of the subject. You can't refuse to confront the truth any longer, chicken-hawk coward. Pathetic..

Keep sinking your tiny chicken-hawk beak into Bush's ass, pussy. :lol:
Wow. I din't see that coming at all. Really, I didn't. :rolleyes:

FP, you sounds like you forgot to take you prozac this morning. Your incredible prose and clever use of progfanity is incredibly impressive as well. :lol:

Wow, you sounf so cool and ascerbate, I'm real inimidated. You're a real tough guy. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You are an imbecile to the nth degree.

[Intifada]

I find it hilarious that CI hasn't realised that somebody edited his sig...

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 08:28 PM
I don't have to prove crap to you. I'm comfortable with my service to my country, and will not cow-tow to you.

I will certainly not discuss it with the likes of you pukes, you don't deserve it.
If you were truly proud of your service to your country, you would tell about it with enthusiasm.

Maybe your "service" is something you'd rather not mention. Like maybe, hanging around glory holes or "dressing up" for your squadmates.

[Dark Exodus]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2005, 10:00 PM
I find it hilarious that CI hasn't realised that somebody edited his sig...
Shh.


I wasn't talking crap, I was responding to someone elses assumption about me. I didn't offer this information in the 1st place. I was simply answering FP.

Thus, why should I discuss it?

Somone called you a coward because he assumes you have never been in a warzone, you replied without actually saying if you have ever been in a combat zone.
I simply posed the question again.

Why don't you answer it and stop this? Prove that you are not a coward by stating where and when you served, if at all. It would certainly be more effective than those tiring flames.

[Free Palestine]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 09:58 PM
Wow. I din't see that coming at all. Really, I didn't. :rolleyes:

FP, you sounds like you forgot to take you prozac this morning. Your incredible prose and clever use of progfanity is incredibly impressive as well. :lol:

Wow, you sounf so cool and ascerbate, I'm real inimidated. You're a real tough guy. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You are an imbecile to the nth degree.

Insult all you want guy, all you can is ad hominem this ad hominem that, insult my intelligence - all the usual neo-con dirty tricks.

I won't do that to you, CI.

I will only call you one thing: chicken-hawk coward.

That's all the ad hominem necessary in your case. :)

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2005, 10:00 PM
I find it hilarious that CI hasn't realised that somebody edited his sig...
I saw it. It may have been you. What do you want me to do about it? I expect nothing less petty than this from you red scum.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Free Palestine+Dec 16 2005, 10:29 PM--> (Free Palestine @ Dec 16 2005, 10:29 PM)
Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 09:58 PM
Wow. I din't see that coming at all. Really, I didn't. :rolleyes:

FP, you sounds like you forgot to take you prozac this morning. Your incredible prose and clever use of progfanity is incredibly impressive as well. :lol:

Wow, you sounf so cool and ascerbate, I'm real inimidated. You're a real tough guy. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You are an imbecile to the nth degree.

Insult all you want guy, all you can is ad hominem this ad hominem that, insult my intelligence - all the usual neo-con dirty tricks.

I won't do that to you, CI.

I will only call you one thing: chicken-hawk coward.

That's all the ad hominem necessary in your case. :) [/b]
You really think that "chicken hawk coward" is the only ad hominem attack you've conducted on me?

Wow, leftists' memory of history is even shorter than I thought.

FP, you have a tendency to go on these angry little tantrums, swearing and saber-rattling, probably because you are lashing out the way you wish you could have against all the jocks that used to beat you up in high school.

It's OK, dude, that stuff is over now (or is it?)

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by NoXion+Dec 16 2005, 10:11 PM--> (NoXion @ Dec 16 2005, 10:11 PM)
Capitalist [email protected] 16 2005, 08:28 PM
I don't have to prove crap to you. I'm comfortable with my service to my country, and will not cow-tow to you.

I will certainly not discuss it with the likes of you pukes, you don't deserve it.
If you were truly proud of your service to your country, you would tell about it with enthusiasm.

Maybe your "service" is something you'd rather not mention. Like maybe, hanging around glory holes or "dressing up" for your squadmates. [/b]
LOL, dude, that was funny.

I have to give it up for that one.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Dark Exodus+Dec 16 2005, 10:15 PM--> (Dark Exodus @ Dec 16 2005, 10:15 PM)
[email protected] 16 2005, 10:00 PM
I find it hilarious that CI hasn't realised that somebody edited his sig...
Shh.


I wasn't talking crap, I was responding to someone elses assumption about me. I didn't offer this information in the 1st place. I was simply answering FP.

Thus, why should I discuss it?

Somone called you a coward because he assumes you have never been in a warzone, you replied without actually saying if you have ever been in a combat zone.
I simply posed the question again.

Why don't you answer it and stop this? Prove that you are not a coward by stating where and when you served, if at all. It would certainly be more effective than those tiring flames. [/b]
Did you actually think that I would fall for this bait?

I telegraphed a post like this as soon as the subject came up.

[Guerrilla22]

CI if Iraq is such an admirable cause why aren't you there. The US army needs some more dumbasses to get used as cannon fodder. Quit hiding behind your computer and go serve your country. Here's a link for you.

www.goarmy.com (http://www.goarmy.com)

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2005, 01:11 AM
CI if Iraq is such an admirable cause why aren't you there. The US army needs some more dumbasses to get used as cannon fodder. Quit hiding behind your computer and go serve your country. Here's a link for you.

www.goarmy.com (http://www.goarmy.com)
This argument is quite effective the 34th time it is presented. Up through #33, I never got it.

Thanks.

[Correa]

CI are you a conservative or a liberal? Do you capitalist pigs have your own website? Besides Stormfront that is.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2005, 01:34 AM
CI are you a conservative or a liberal? Do you capitalist pigs have your own website? Besides Stormfront that is.
I'm conservative on economics, infrastructure, spending, and foreign policy.

I'm socially moderate and secular.

[Guerrilla22]

Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Dec 17 2005, 01:15 AM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Dec 17 2005, 01:15 AM)
[email protected] 17 2005, 01:11 AM
CI if Iraq is such an admirable cause why aren't you there. The US army needs some more dumbasses to get used as cannon fodder. Quit hiding behind your computer and go serve your country. Here's a link for you.

www.goarmy.com (http://www.goarmy.com)
This argument is quite effective the 34th time it is presented. Up through #33, I never got it.

Thanks. [/b]
So why won't you sign up?

[Zingu]

Its proof enough that Capitalist Idiot sits here for hours everday flaming us....

Pathetic, if you even think you can talk the talk, then go sign up and impress us.

[Correa]

So what is the arguement for not signing up? Can anybody share it with me? :mellow:

[BuyOurEverything]

While I've never heard of and am doubtful of the claim that the Vietnamese used boobytrapped babies, it is fact that insurgent and guerilla armies use whatever soldiers they can get, women and children included. While in this perticular video, it seems they were just throwing rocks, I agree with CI in that it is not out of the question that a child might throw a grenade. Not to mention that the one truck there looked open and a rock could do some serious damage if it actually hit a guy.

One of the major problems with the left is that it is too focused on condemning the brutalities of war. War is inherantly fucking brutal. Women, children, men, civilians, workers, they all die in war. It's not the US, it's not the war in Iraq, it's war in general. If I was in a place where people wanted to kill me, you can bet your ass I'd be on edge and ready to fucking shoot anything that moved. What we need to do is oppose war in general and expose the realities of war period. The US doesn't purposely go and kill children because they're evil, that's just what happens in war. The problem is that most people don't realize what war entails.

[Free Palestine]

CI, everyone here knows you wouldn't get within 10,000 miles of a combat zone in your entire miserable life, so your opinion, Mr. Warmonger Chickenhawk, is fairly useless. I couldn't help but laugh in your face when you mentioned how we're all "naive of the realities of a third-world war zone." That was truly Chicken-Hawk Soup for the Soul. You loud-mouth dipshit, you have never enlisted and yet you speak as if your opinion carries any weight.

It doesn't. No one gives a fuck what a chubby chicken-hawk pussy like you thinks. But I am sure you haven't lived in reality long enough to figure this out, fat-so.

That's pretty much the norm for the right-wing, pro-war crowd; most are a bunch of tubby I.T. geeks whose only taste of "combat" comes from Hollywood war flicks, computer games, and weekend paintball "battles."

You're just a typical right-wing troll who gets his jollies tossing out the same old, tired, bullshit-laden right-wing screeds. I mean, how do we judge this generation of right-wing, pro-war hawks, so many of whom won't serve in this war they want so badly? Personally, I think you and your kind are all a bunch of cowardly ****s.

[Loknar]

I would be worried too about a grenade being tossed.

As I'm not in a combat zone, I wont judge those men. I dont think they should be permitted to shoot at will though.


btw, what the fuck are these kids doing hanging around on the side of the road with out their parents??


a second thought

I wouldn’t put it past the insurgency to use children. In Palestine children probably have been used. I recall a story about a year or 2 ago where a kid went to blow him self up, but got cold feet The Israelis actually disarmed the kid with a robot when they very well could have blown him away and would have been justified in doing so

[Dark Exodus]

I wouldn’t put it past the insurgency to use children. In Palestine children probably have been used. I recall a story about a year or 2 ago where a kid went to blow him self up, but got cold feet The Israelis actually disarmed the kid with a robot when they very well could have blown him away and would have been justified in doing so

Though I agree with what you are saying, thats not the best example (the child was not the intended bomber).


Did you actually think that I would fall for this bait?

I telegraphed a post like this as soon as the subject came up.

Actually, I just needed a post that contained an evasion, an accurate conclusion as to whether you have actually been in a warzone has been met. My last post had no flames or any other such excuses.

No-one expects you to actually answer questions :lol:

[ComTom]

There has been no proof within recent years of the invasion into Iraq and the insurgent operations there, that there has been female suicide bombers. The last time there was children suicide bombers was in Uzbekistan in 1998 or 99' when a child blew herself up in a busy market. The closest thing to a child jihadist has been a young adult who happened to be female in Tel Afar. She strapped a bomb to herself and blew herself up in a recruiting center. There has been no child suicide bombings in the area. So I wouldn't worry about child suicide bombers, you capitalist fool, you have no idea what you are talking about.

[HateandWar]

Listen CI I'm not gonna flame you I'm gonna ask outright where did you serve? If you have then judging by your character it shouldn't be an issue to just tell us as you would be swelling with pride about it anyway. Dont call me an idiot just answer the fucking question.

[Purple]

"He threw a rock right there; he could have killed us"

[Maoprasad]

Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2005, 04:03 AM

btw, what the fuck are these kids doing hanging around on the side of the road with out their parents??


Ever wondered about the possiblity that their parents were killed for democracy ?

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4279/1754/400/A%20young%20Iraqi%20mother%20liberated.jpg
Mother liberated in Iraq

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4279/1754/400/A%20little%20girl%20cries%20beside%20the%20body%20 of%20her%20father%2C%20slain%20before%20her%20eyes .jpg

A little girl cries beside the body of her father, slain before her eyes

[Capitalist Imperial]

CI, everyone here knows you wouldn't get within 10,000 miles of a combat zone in your entire miserable life, so your opinion, Mr. Warmonger Chickenhawk, is fairly useless. I couldn't help but laugh in your face when you mentioned how we're all "naive of the realities of a third-world war zone." That was truly Chicken-Hawk Soup for the Soul. You loud-mouth dipshit, you have never enlisted and yet you speak as if your opinion carries any weight.

OK, FP, first take the little green pill, then take the little blue pill, then you'll be back in your happy place, OK?


CI, everyone here knows you wouldn't get within 10,000 miles of a combat zone in your entire miserable life

Actually, if you had basic math skills, you would know that I aready am within 10,000 miles of a war zone. However, you're just not that smart of a person, so I guess that comment made sense to you.


It doesn't. No one gives a fuck what a chubby chicken-hawk pussy like you thinks. But I am sure you haven't lived in reality long enough to figure this out, fat-so.

Please keep posting stuff like this, please. It's gold. I see that you are one of those guys that likes to get tough on internet chat boards. Compensating for the bullying you received in highschool? I doubt that you would be so brazen to my face. In fact, I'm pretty confident that you wouldn't be at all.


That's pretty much the norm for the right-wing, pro-war crowd; most are a bunch of tubby I.T. geeks whose only taste of "combat" comes from Hollywood war flicks, computer games, and weekend paintball "battles."

The more you post you assumptions about me, the dumber you become. How can you be so oblivious and obtuse? Do you even read your own posts?


You're just a typical right-wing troll who gets his jollies tossing out the same old, tired, bullshit-laden right-wing screeds. I mean, how do we judge this generation of right-wing, pro-war hawks, so many of whom won't serve in this war they want so badly? Personally, I think you and your kind are all a bunch of cowardly ****s.

So tell me, FP, what do I do for a living? Since you know the full extent on service to my nation, why don't you provide us all with a dissertation of what I do and what I've never done.

Oh, and mmost importantly, take your meds.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2005, 10:50 PM
There has been no proof within recent years of the invasion into Iraq and the insurgent operations there, that there has been female suicide bombers. The last time there was children suicide bombers was in Uzbekistan in 1998 or 99' when a child blew herself up in a busy market. The closest thing to a child jihadist has been a young adult who happened to be female in Tel Afar. She strapped a bomb to herself and blew herself up in a recruiting center. There has been no child suicide bombings in the area. So I wouldn't worry about child suicide bombers, you capitalist fool, you have no idea what you are talking about.
If that is really what you believe, then you arte truly blind to the middle east and how many insurgents there operate.

You call me a fool yet you pretty much deny that there could be female bombers in Iraq, when in fact many female bombers have been indentified in the middle east in general.

Talk about foolish...

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Maoprasad+Dec 18 2005, 05:02 AM--> (Maoprasad @ Dec 18 2005, 05:02 AM)
[email protected] 17 2005, 04:03 AM

btw, what the fuck are these kids doing hanging around on the side of the road with out their parents??


Ever wondered about the possiblity that their parents were killed for democracy ?

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4279/1754/400/A%20young%20Iraqi%20mother%20liberated.jpg
Mother liberated in Iraq

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4279/1754/400/A%20little%20girl%20cries%20beside%20the%20body%20 of%20her%20father%2C%20slain%20before%20her%20eyes .jpg

A little girl cries beside the body of her father, slain before her eyes [/b]
Emotional appeals do little to truly analyze and understand the realities of the extension of politics that we call war.

This post is farm league crap.

[Intifada]

Why not answer HateandWar's question, CI?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 18 2005, 08:55 PM
Why not answer HateandWar's question, CI?
The question has been asked before HateandWar asked it.

Why does it matter whether I served? It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument. I don't have to serve in the military to contribute to my country, or submit an opinion of the war.

Thus, to answer would lend legitimacy to the idea that you have to serve or have served to have an opinion on the war, and I will not acknowledge that.

[Correa]

If he did serve he would proudly say. So thanks for answer the question. ;)

[HateandWar]

Thank you Intifada. And by the way CI its a simple question that will detract nothing from the argument. Now that you've made your statement about why you didnt want to answer we will remember this and we will not presume that you need to have served to have an opinion about the war nor will we presume that to be your position. So just humour an ignorant commie and tell me where you served.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 18 2005, 10:19 PM
If he did serve he would proudly say. So thanks for answer the question. ;)
Wow, great bait. You are so intelligent in trying to prod me into disclosing my past.

What a move indeed. :rolleyes:

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 18 2005, 11:06 PM
Thank you Intifada. And by the way CI its a simple question that will detract nothing from the argument. Now that you've made your statement about why you didnt want to answer we will remember this and we will not presume that you need to have served to have an opinion about the war nor will we presume that to be your position. So just humour an ignorant commie and tell me where you served.
I was the fire control officer on an Arleigh Burke class missle cruiser.

[The Grey Blur]

Why did that take so long? :lol:

[Capitalist Imperial]

Because:

#1: I didn't like being called out and asked to answer at their whims and...

#2: I wanted to demonstrate just how ignorant and presumptous Free Palestine and others who made inane assumptions about me were (though it was quite obvious), so I let them talk shit several times before advising them that they were talking out of their ass.

[Free Palestine]

Unit? Rank? Callsign? Proof? Lets see a scan of your Geneva Conventions Identity Card. I'd bet my last dime you're lying and live at home with Mom. So CI, why aren't you enlisted now? You mean all that right-wing armchair "Rah-rah, let's kick some ass!" war chanting you recite and you are so safe and far removed from the danger? What a surprise! :rolleyes: You still sound like a chickenhawk, chicken-shit coward to me. Why don't you sign up and "fight for your country?" Your country needs you boy, ship yourself over to Iraq ASAP.

[HateandWar]

Thank you CI I was merely curious as to your post nothing more.

[hamperleft]

CI man, ur my hero, u served on a boat, that launched missiles at helpless villages, killing civilians, while you sat secure in your chair, controlling fire, your so brave. Lobbing missiles and shells at civilians miles away defiantly qualifies as combat experience.

no offence to any real solder's who have actualy seen combat

(love the solder, hate the war)

[Capitalist Imperial]

You mean all that right-wing armchair "Rah-rah, let's kick some ass!" war chanting you recite and you are so safe and far removed from the danger? What a surprise! :rolleyes: You still sound like a chickenhawk, chicken-shit coward to me. Why don't you sign up and "fight for your country?" Your country needs you boy, ship yourself over to Iraq ASAP.


You mean all that right-wing armchair "Rah-rah, let's kick some ass!" war chanting you recite and you are so safe and far removed from the danger?

The USS Cole was the exact same class of ship I was on. I was on 2 deployments in the gulf around the same time. It certainly wasn't removed from danger. Perhaps if you had even a smidgeon of knowledge about terrorist attacks against America you would not have shot yourself in the foot like that.

One more thing,

Your continued overuse of profanity is indicative of frustration, possibly stemming from the fact that I made you look like a dumbass, not that it was difficult, you do most of the work yourself.

Unit?

Fire Control, VLS

Rank?

Second Liutenent

Callsign?

Surface Combatant Officers don't have callsigns.



Lets see a scan of your Geneva Conventions Identity Card.

I've answered you to a significant extent. Why do you continue to make yourself look dumber? I entered in the late nineties after college. I was done with my service and working in the private sector before 9/11.

I'd bet my last dime you're lying and live at home with Mom.

You also bet that I had not served in the military. It's amazing how pathetic you are. Keep the dime, you need it to buy a clue.

So CI, why aren't you enlisted now?

I am doing good for myself in the private sector. I served honorably, and my experience yielded me some success in the financial world.



You mean all that right-wing armchair "Rah-rah, let's kick some ass!" war chanting

Can you cite an example of what you are interpreting as war chanting?



...and you are so safe and far removed from the danger?

Like I said, I served my time. Had we entered war when I was on board, I would have done my duty. Trust me, I was ready. However, it was a peaceful time for the empire, so I moved on. Had I known 9/11 and the ensuing war were to occur, I probably would have stayed on.


You still sound like a chickenhawk, chicken-shit coward to me.

You used to get bullied, didn't you?


Why don't you sign up and "fight for your country?" Your country needs you boy, ship yourself over to Iraq ASAP.

My contribution is now on the conomic front, helping to fuel the resurgence of the US economy that is now taking place, a ressurgence that will ensure that the nation is strong in the next challenging years.

So, Free Palestine, I answered you questions, why don't you tell us what you are doing for your cause. Or are you simply a rebelling teenager playing armchair revolutionary from your upper-middle class family's compuetr?

[Free Palestine]

Oh boy. I was a Marine too. I served in Vietnam from 1967-1968.

Now, until you shut your fat yap and show us some proof.. My claim will remain just as valid as yours.

[kingbee]

As much as I'm sure many of us don't want to believe him, I'm going to have to! Free Palestine, I think we're going to have to give him the benefit of the doubt...

[Intifada]

Assuming CI is telling the truth, he's still a chicken-hawk pussy.

Sitting in a boat is not comparable to fighting on the ground like the Iraqis, or even the well-equipped and trained US soldiers.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 19 2005, 02:11 PM
Assuming CI is telling the truth, he's still a chicken-hawk pussy.

Sitting in a boat is not comparable to fighting on the ground like the Iraqis, or even the well-equipped and trained US soldiers.
The navy is still the most important component of an empire's military. I didn't join thinking that I would be fighting in Iraq in the first place. It was a peaceful time then.

In a situation such as Iraq, i believe that it is much safer on a ship than on the ground.

However, history always shows us that when two significant powers with modern navies engage each other, the combat ships are in fact one of the most dangerous places to be.

[Goatse]

I won't argue about how much safer it is in the navy than the ground forces, since it's irrelevant during peacetime. However, CI, could you present us with any real, definite proof?

[Ownthink]

Second Liutenent
Learn to spell "lieutenant", first. Then maybe your claim will have .1% more validity.

[Intifada]

Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Dec 19 2005, 07:13 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Dec 19 2005, 07:13 PM)
[email protected] 19 2005, 02:11 PM
Assuming CI is telling the truth, he's still a chicken-hawk pussy.

Sitting in a boat is not comparable to fighting on the ground like the Iraqis, or even the well-equipped and trained US soldiers.
The navy is still the most important component of an empire's military. I didn't join thinking that I would be fighting in Iraq in the first place. It was a peaceful time then.

In a situation such as Iraq, i believe that it is much safer on a ship than on the ground.

However, history always shows us that when two significant powers with modern navies engage each other, the combat ships are in fact one of the most dangerous places to be. [/b]
So you haven't actually been at war, have you?

Chicken-hawk.

[Free Palestine]

Originally posted by [email protected] 19 2005, 12:25 PM
As much as I'm sure many of us don't want to believe him, I'm going to have to! Free Palestine, I think we're going to have to give him the benefit of the doubt...

If CI had been upfront and clear about this since the begining I would not have questioned him. However, circa 4,000 posts and three years at this forum and this is seemingly the first anyone has heard of it. Moreover, I gauged him on this continuously for a few days and he evaded my question over and over again. Why did he wait so long? In a feeble attempt to show how "presumptuous" I am? Sorry, no dice CI. I don't buy it. Once again; lets see some proof. I'm just as much a "veteran" as you are right now. Anyone can fabricate stories on the internet. Your claim is only more valid than mine when you show us some proof.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Intifada+Dec 19 2005, 09:06 PM--> (Intifada @ Dec 19 2005, 09:06 PM)
Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 19 2005, 07:13 PM

[email protected] 19 2005, 02:11 PM
Assuming CI is telling the truth, he's still a chicken-hawk pussy.

Sitting in a boat is not comparable to fighting on the ground like the Iraqis, or even the well-equipped and trained US soldiers.
The navy is still the most important component of an empire's military. I didn't join thinking that I would be fighting in Iraq in the first place. It was a peaceful time then.

In a situation such as Iraq, i believe that it is much safer on a ship than on the ground.

However, history always shows us that when two significant powers with modern navies engage each other, the combat ships are in fact one of the most dangerous places to be.
So you haven't actually been at war, have you?

Chicken-hawk. [/b]
Explain how that makes me a chicken hawk.

Honestly, you guys are stretching pretty desperately now.

By the way, I did lob a few tomahawks at Iraqi SAM and Radar sights in the southern no fly zone a couple of times aroung 1998/1999.

I don't consider that mortal combat of course. However, I did my part, and I did more for my cause than any of you would ever do for yours.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Free Palestine+Dec 19 2005, 09:24 PM--> (Free Palestine @ Dec 19 2005, 09:24 PM)
[email protected] 19 2005, 12:25 PM
As much as I'm sure many of us don't want to believe him, I'm going to have to! Free Palestine, I think we're going to have to give him the benefit of the doubt...

If CI had been upfront and clear about this since the begining I would not have questioned him. However, circa 4,000 posts and three years at this forum and this is seemingly the first anyone has heard of it. Moreover, I gauged him on this continuously for a few days and he evaded my question over and over again. Why did he wait so long? In a feeble attempt to show how "presumptuous" I am? Sorry, no dice CI. I don't buy it. Once again; lets see some proof. I'm just as much a "veteran" as you are right now. Anyone can fabricate stories on the internet. Your claim is only more valid than mine when you show us some proof. [/b]
And if I provide such proof? What are you willing to do?

Are you going to concede that you were a stupid ass for talking shit about things which you no nothing about?

If you truly don't believe me, then you won't mind if i call your bluff:

So, I propose this: If I provide proof of my service, after all of your calling me out and shit-talking, will you concede that you were a stupid punk-***** for making assumptions and talking so much smack, only to end up being wrong?

What's up now?



However, circa 4,000 posts and three years at this forum and this is seemingly the first anyone has heard of it.

Most people who post here don't post about their personal lives asshole.

[bcbm]

Originally posted by [email protected] 19 2005, 08:11 AM
Assuming CI is telling the truth, he's still a chicken-hawk pussy.

Sitting in a boat is not comparable to fighting on the ground like the Iraqis, or even the well-equipped and trained US soldiers.
I don't see how following one's natural self-preservation instincts makes one a "pussy," nor do I see what is wrong with being a "pussy." This sort of shit seems to be reinforcing macho attitudes and we don't need that here.

[Intifada]

CI is a pussy in that he would shit his pants if he was ever in a situation which US soldiers find themselves in, in Iraq, no matter how gun-ho he is about the invasion and occupation.

[Free Palestine]

What is taking you so long to post proof? Does it take that long to figure out how to fabricate substantiation for your claim? :lol:

[Master Che]

Wow CI got pwned (again).

[Loknar]

You guys are a bunch of dick heads. How do we know who CI is? How the hell do I know if Free Palestine likes Woody Allen? We're all in the internet.

And this idea that being in the navy makes you a faggot and a pussy is pure bullshit. I'd love to see any of you sit in a sub with depth charges sinking on your ass or having a torpedo streaming at you.

Sure it isn’t likely to happen now, but in 20 years when we are fighting chinamen it may.....their shit box navy will still gets its ass kicked.

And Free Palestine, you’re probably a middle class Palestinian, the son of a doctor, and you wont be a suicide bomber or militant. No not you, because your father is a doctor and you cant do that, only the poor can. Speaking of class war, do you know of any rich palestinians blowing their asses up? I dont, i only see poor ones do it.

. I bet you've never been to the west bank or gaza strip but rather sit at some university and ***** about theIsraelis. What is with the woody allen avatr?

[Xvall]

I'd love to see any of you sit in a sub with depth charges sinking on your ass or having a torpedo streaming at you.

I'm sure he was totally doing that.


Sure it isn’t likely to happen now, but in 20 years when we are fighting chinamen it may

:lol:

[JKP]

Woody Allen?

Right click on the avatar and click view image.

Tell me what you see then.

[Ownthink]

It's Noam Chomsky you stupid dick.

[Loknar]

Oh yeah, I see now.

To me it looked like woody allen.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 20 2005, 09:36 PM
CI is a pussy in that he would shit his pants if he was ever in a situation which US soldiers find themselves in, in Iraq, no matter how gun-ho he is about the invasion and occupation.
I've beem in tougher situations thatn you'll ever find yourselves in.

Intifada, you probably wouldn't talk halfthe shit you do in this forum to anyones face.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by Master [email protected] 20 2005, 11:25 PM
Wow CI got pwned (again).
How So?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 21 2005, 08:40 PM

I'd love to see any of you sit in a sub with depth charges sinking on your ass or having a torpedo streaming at you.

I'm sure he was totally doing that.


Sure it isn’t likely to happen now, but in 20 years when we are fighting chinamen it may

:lol:
I did my part. I lobbed a few cruise missles into the southern no fly zone, targeting SAM and Radar sites. I killed my share of Iraqi regulars.

We were ready for a terrorist bombing (though in pre 9/11 fashion).

The USS Cole was bombed later. It was the same class of ship I was on, and deployed in a region that I was deployed in. Around the same time, too. The danger was real.

I'm sure most if not everyone here knows little of what life on an American battlecruiser is like.

Yet you all seem to talk mess as if you do.

[Intifada]

I've beem in tougher situations thatn you'll ever find yourselves in.

Now who is presuming?


Intifada, you probably wouldn't talk halfthe shit you do in this forum to anyones face.

I know I wouldn't say anything to you.

I'd beat the shit out of you.

[Correa]

Free Palestine's avatar seems like a young Noam Chomsky, but I'm not sure.

[Ownthink]

Originally posted by [email protected] 22 2005, 08:40 PM
Free Palestine's avatar seems like a young Noam Chomsky, but I'm not sure.
You are correct.

[Free Palestine]

God damn that's hilarious. I'm putting that in my sig. Your stupidity knows no bounds, Loknar.

[Guerrilla22]

Sure it isn’t likely to happen now, but in 20 years when we are fighting chinamen it may.....their shit box navy will still gets its ass kicked.

Chinamen? The fuck?

[Bugalu Shrimp]

Whats the point of war if you can't kill a few kids?

[Loknar]

Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 08:25 AM

Sure it isn’t likely to happen now, but in 20 years when we are fighting chinamen it may.....their shit box navy will still gets its ass kicked.

Chinamen? The fuck?
What? You dont know what a chinamen is?

[Loknar]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 23 2005, 02:00 AM
God damn that's hilarious. I'm putting that in my sig. Your stupidity knows no bounds, Loknar.
Hey fine with me, i think it looks funny actually.

put [sic] next to my mis spelled word.

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by [email protected] 22 2005, 04:52 PM

I've beem in tougher situations thatn you'll ever find yourselves in.

Now who is presuming?


Intifada, you probably wouldn't talk halfthe shit you do in this forum to anyones face.

I know I wouldn't say anything to you.

I'd beat the shit out of you.
It's quite easy to get tough on an internet chat board, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that you are a weak puke.

[Free Palestine]

And I'd bet dollars to donuts that Emperor Sam is actually CI.

[Emperor Sam]

You have been restricted due to your anti-semetism? What, exactly, does "restricted" mean here?

And who is Ci?

[bezdomni]

CI is Capitalist Imperial.

Anti-zionism is not anti-semitism. Know what you're talking about before you spew shit.

Free Palestine said some things against zionism (which was interpreted as being against jews) and got restricted. It's kind of bogus, really.

[rioters bloc]

Originally posted by Emperor [email protected] 27 2005, 10:58 AM
You have been restricted due to your anti-semetism? What, exactly, does "restricted" mean here?

And who is Ci?
restriction means you are only able to post in the 'opposing ideologies' (OI) forum, although you can still view the others.

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by [email protected] 27 2005, 12:56 AM


Anti-zionism is not anti-semitism. Know what you're talking about before you spew shit.


Only those that lack critical thinking skills attempt to employ such absolutes.

By the way, profanity is often indicative of a struggle with real analysis.

There are many different interpretations of "Zionist", and anti-semetism has often been associated with this word. Most individuals that have considered themselves "against Zionism" have appeared to me to be anti-semetic.

Based on the rules of this site, I doubt such a restriction would have occured if Free Palestine had not been viewed as anti-semetic.

[Free Palestine]

Why did you bring this subject up? Are you trying to divert the issue that you are in fact CI registered under a different name?

[bezdomni]

Originally posted by Emperor [email protected] 27 2005, 01:03 AM

Only those that lack critical thinking skills attempt to employ such absolutes.

By the way, profanity is often indicative of a struggle with real analysis.

There are many different interpretations of "Zionist", and anti-semetism has often been associated with this word. Most individuals that have considered themselves "against Zionism" have appeared to me to be anti-semetic.

Based on the rules of this site, I doubt such a restriction would have occured if Free Palestine had not been viewed as anti-semetic.
So far, you seem to be incapable of employing these "critical thinking skills" that you speak of.

I would kill myself if I were unable to analyze your primitive ideology and poor rhetorical skills. I use profanity out of habit and sheer frustration.

I know that anti-zionism can be anti-semetic, but it doesn't have to be. And Free Palestine is no anti-semite.

Remember that you are the first person who related anti-semitism with anti-zionism, not me.

You are also the person who made the hasty and illogical conclusion that I am a racist because I noticed that every president of the US was white and rich.

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 27 2005, 01:04 AM
Why did you bring this subject up? Are you trying to divert the issue that you are in fact CI registered under a different name?
?????

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by [email protected] 27 2005, 01:12 AM






I would kill myself if I were unable to analyze your primitive ideology and poor rhetorical skills. I use profanity out of habit and sheer frustration.

We should be so lucky. Your critical thinking dictated that a human-conceived, anthropomorphized creature was an actual alien.

I
know that anti-zionism can be anti-semetic, but it doesn't have to be.

That is a cop-out.


And Free Palestine is no anti-semite.

Then why was he restricted?


Remember that you are the first person who related anti-semitism with anti-zionism, not me.

Actually, anti-semitism and anti-zionism were related concepts before I was even born. I didn't need to relate them for them to in fact be related. I was merely asking a question.


You are also the person who made the hasty and illogical conclusion that I am a racist because I noticed that every president of the US was white and rich.

Don't forget male.

Ah, the successful, white male, the catch-all for liberals looking to find blame for their failures. If all else fails, we can always attack them, as they are not even allowed to answer back, because if they do we can simply call them racist and sexist.

Not every president has been rich. Lincoln was dirt poor. Carter was a peanut famer.

[Free Palestine]

Stop feigning ignorance. Could it be anymore obvious that you are CI registered under a different name? CI was just banned, and his clone registers the next day. Who could it be? You just callled someone a "puke" for Christ's sake. We're not talking quantum physics here, you make it painfully obvious. And your inability to use the quote function properly isn't helping you either.

[Intifada]

Originally posted by Emperor Sam+Dec 26 2005, 09:22 PM--> (Emperor Sam @ Dec 26 2005, 09:22 PM)
[email protected] 22 2005, 04:52 PM

I've beem in tougher situations thatn you'll ever find yourselves in.

Now who is presuming?


Intifada, you probably wouldn't talk halfthe shit you do in this forum to anyones face.

I know I wouldn't say anything to you.

I'd beat the shit out of you.
It's quite easy to get tough on an internet chat board, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that you are a weak puke. [/b]
The problem with the internet...

I wish you were in front of me right now...

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 27 2005, 03:12 AM


Stop feigning ignorance.

I don't know what you're talking about.


Could it be anymore obvious that you are CI registered under a different name? CI was just banned, and his clone registers the next day. Who could it be?

That must be a coincidence.


You just callled someone a "puke" for Christ's sake

Further coincidence


We're not talking quantum physics here

No big surprise there.


And your inability to use the quote function properly isn't helping you either.

I don't know what you're talking about.

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by Intifada+Dec 27 2005, 03:47 PM--> (Intifada @ Dec 27 2005, 03:47 PM)
Originally posted by Emperor [email protected] 26 2005, 09:22 PM

[email protected] 22 2005, 04:52 PM

I've beem in tougher situations thatn you'll ever find yourselves in.

Now who is presuming?


Intifada, you probably wouldn't talk halfthe shit you do in this forum to anyones face.

I know I wouldn't say anything to you.

I'd beat the shit out of you.
It's quite easy to get tough on an internet chat board, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that you are a weak puke.
The problem with the internet...

I wish you were in front of me right now... [/b]
No you don't, you jusdt think you do. Your attitude would likely change in a face to face engagement.

Most leftists are twig-eating hippie pacifists, or some variant therof. Maybe you are an exception, but I certainly am not going to bow to such intimidation.

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 27 2005, 03:12 AM
Stop feigning ignorance. Could it be anymore obvious that you are CI registered under a different name? CI was just banned, and his clone registers the next day. Who could it be? You just callled someone a "puke" for Christ's sake. We're not talking quantum physics here, you make it painfully obvious. And your inability to use the quote function properly isn't helping you either.
By the way, your avatar of the stupid commie scum Chomsky does look like a young Woody Allen.

[bezdomni]

Originally posted by Emperor [email protected] 27 2005, 01:33 AM
We should be so lucky. Your critical thinking dictated that a human-conceived, anthropomorphized creature was an actual alien.

I
know that anti-zionism can be anti-semetic, but it doesn't have to be.

That is a cop-out.


And Free Palestine is no anti-semite.

Then why was he restricted?


Remember that you are the first person who related anti-semitism with anti-zionism, not me.

Actually, anti-semitism and anti-zionism were related concepts before I was even born. I didn't need to relate them for them to in fact be related. I was merely asking a question.




Still on about the alien, are you? I was trying to make fun people who call immigrants "aliens". I'll make sure that I'm cold and dry in the future, just so you don't have to strain your brain too much with your ape-like "critical thinking" skills.

How is explaining the difference between anti-zionism and anti-semitism a cop out? You are ridiculous.

I didn't restrict Free Palestine, so how would I really know why he was restricted? I assume an admin mistook something he said.


Don't forget male.

Ah, the successful, white male, the catch-all for liberals looking to find blame for their failures. If all else fails, we can always attack them, as they are not even allowed to answer back, because if they do we can simply call them racist and sexist.

Not every president has been rich. Lincoln was dirt poor. Carter was a peanut famer.

That is a cop out. You are begging the question. I accuse you of making a hasty generalization and you don't even address it. You make logical fallacy after logical fallacy. Do you know anything about argumentation, or do you enjoy pulling your "arguments" out of your ass?

Anyway, Lincoln was not dirt poor. Do some research. He was born in a log cabin, but he was not born into poverty.

As for Carter, his background isn't much different from Clinton's. The fact is, when he ran for president he had money. You have to have a lot of money (both in your pocket and from donors) in order to win the presidency in this country. His parents might not have been wealthy, but he had an obviously sufficent amount of money when he ran for president.

Analyze this critically...what does it say about a country when you have to be rich in order to lead it? Or does critical analysis not apply to you anymore?

[LA GUERRA OLVIDADA]

Those weren't rocks you fucking idiot commies. Those were presents for the troops.

Another example of how the far-left in America spins the real news.

[Emperor Sam]

Originally posted by LA GUERRA [email protected] 28 2005, 01:55 AM
Those weren't rocks you fucking idiot commies. Those were presents for the troops.

Another example of how the far-left in America spins the real news.
YES!

[Free Palestine]

By the way, your avatar of the stupid commie scum Chomsky does look like a young Woody Allen.

You really show how ignorant you are. Chomsky is one of the biggest anti-communists of the left.

[Loknar]

I personally have nothing against Chomsky. Though if he is anti commie then why do communists like him so much?

[Luís Henrique]

Originally posted by [email protected] 28 2005, 11:21 AM
I personally have nothing against Chomsky. Though if he is anti commie then why do communists like him so much?
I don't like Chomsky. Can't speak for others, though.

Chomsky is, first of all, a great linguist. His achievements in linguistic theory cannot be ignored, and anyone who refers to him as "idiot", "scum", etc, is either a very ignorant person, or a complete imbecile.

Do you "like" Sir Isaac Newton?

Second, whether is Chomsky is "likeable" or not, his political statements stand on their own. I see a lot of them that I agree with, or at least think are thought provoking, or plausible. I see others that I don't agree with.

I will defend him and his statements, if they are attacked by right wingers.

I don't think he is an "anti-communist". But he certainly isn't a "Communist" in the sence the word is used in mainstream America; ie, he isn't a Leninist or a Marxist.

Luís Henrique

[Counter-Insurgent]

Actually, I do appreciate Chomsky with respect to his linguistics.

He is one of the only people I've read with a linguistic capability that matches mine.

[JKP]

Originally posted by Free [email protected] 28 2005, 02:01 AM

By the way, your avatar of the stupid commie scum Chomsky does look like a young Woody Allen.

You really show how ignorant you are. Chomsky is one of the biggest anti-communists of the left.
Anti-Leninist.

[Morpheus]

Originally posted by [email protected] 28 2005, 11:30 AM
I personally have nothing against Chomsky. Though if he is anti commie then why do communists like him so much?
Chomsky has written some of the best criticisms of US imperialism and the media around, and Leninists happen to agree with his stance on those issues. Now, get Chomsky talking about Leninism and his anarchist criticisms will get them pissed.