jaster
15th December 2005, 18:47
the american/european diefinition of terror/terroisim is deeply flawed, as benjamin netanayu (former Israeli prime minister) defines it as the "deliberate intimidation or killings of civialians ass to inspire terror" what is wrong with this is the broadness and a wide range of ossibilites, form instance the bombing of tunisia by the IAF (Israeli air force) could be interpreted as terror, but never is becuase Israel is in americas pocket. on the flip side, Everything palistinians do or attacks by the Iraqi resistance is either terrorisim or "opposers of liberty or freedom" while i do not dispute that some of the sthings that are carried out by the fighters can be construted as terror (car bombs in front of mosques) the majority of attacks on troops and occupation soldeirs is not terror it is resistance.