Log in

View Full Version : Bush and his push for "Freedom"



The_Titoist
24th November 2005, 01:17
These pictures disgusted me. Nothing will make me feel better then Bush arrested and charged for War Crimes.

Iraq "Liberation" Pictures (http://www.nata2.info/?path=war%2Firaq_war)

Ownthink
24th November 2005, 01:56
That shit is sickening.

Bannockburn
24th November 2005, 05:26
I always have to remind myself that when Bush talks about liberation, he means life from bodies.

Tekun
24th November 2005, 11:37
I agree that Bush is overally responsible for this carnage
But, something that pisses me off, is those that commit these acts, meaning soldiers

Recently, a childhood friend of mine, who became a Marine died in an explosion over in Iraq
His fam as well as mine were shaken and disturbed by his death, but they were surprised by my indifference

As far as Im concerned, Bush is not pulling the trigger, its all the ignorant patriotic American scum who are

They are the ones invading, they are the ones killing, they are the ones who rape and pillage
I am apalled by the ignorance and indifference that they show in the face of injustice

If they wanted, the entire military force could revolt against their orders/superiors and end this war, or they could put down their arms - therez more of them than there are politicians or generals
But they wont, I've become convinced that they like killing these "ragheads", as they call em

And thats why Im pissed more at soldiers than at politicians
I hope more of these punks face resistance and retaliation for all the shit they've done to Iraqi's :angry:

drain.you
24th November 2005, 15:12
when Bush talks about liberation, he means life from bodies.
Thats a great quote, comrade.

Atlas Swallowed
24th November 2005, 15:38
I agree with Tekun. The soldiers bear responsibility also. The truly brave ones are the few who choose not to kill unjustly. It is a choice, they chose to commit murder.

Bannockburn
24th November 2005, 16:44
Thats a great quote, comrade.

Thanks mate!

I can't say that I disagree with Tekun. In fact, there is a massive propaganda campaign to try to deter such reasoning. We hear it everyday. “I don't support the war, but I support the troops”. Well what the hell does that mean? It means nothing. Look, I'm going to be frank here. Nobody likes having our friends going over to some bullshit war and getting killed for no reason. We especially don't like having our friends and relatives being blown apart and then saying they did a “service to your freedom”. Bullshit. I was not more or less free when he was alive, therefore why was he murdering and why was he murdered?

The fact is, everyone already implicitly supports the “troops” insofar they are our friends and relatives. This is pretty obvious. However, it doesn't mean anything. The real questions should be something like, “support our policy”. That actually means something.

Yet, nevertheless as Tekun rightfully said, its themselves who are pulling the trigger. They are the one's releasing the bombs, shooting and torturing. Of course, they are rewarded as good deeds, and are “hero's”, with parades and little festivals. But we ourselves can't be considered as innocent either. Dead Americans....the executioners are its citizens. We pay for the taxes to build those bombs. We pay the taxes the keep these fucks in power. You want to stop this war, well its easy stop the communication process of money. If money stops flowing, well so does the war.

Stam
24th November 2005, 16:46
I think that Bush has a only a little bit of guilt, but those fu*king marines they are the ones who are really guilty. I think they all need to be locked up in jail

Ownthink
24th November 2005, 17:41
Originally posted by [email protected] 24 2005, 11:49 AM


Thats a great quote, comrade.

Thanks mate!

I can't say that I disagree with Tekun. In fact, there is a massive propaganda campaign to try to deter such reasoning. We hear it everyday. “I don't support the war, but I support the troops”. Well what the hell does that mean? It means nothing. Look, I'm going to be frank here. Nobody likes having our friends going over to some bullshit war and getting killed for no reason. We especially don't like having our friends and relatives being blown apart and then saying they did a “service to your freedom”. Bullshit. I was not more or less free when he was alive, therefore why was he murdering and why was he murdered?

The fact is, everyone already implicitly supports the “troops” insofar they are our friends and relatives. This is pretty obvious. However, it doesn't mean anything. The real questions should be something like, “support our policy”. That actually means something.

Yet, nevertheless as Tekun rightfully said, its themselves who are pulling the trigger. They are the one's releasing the bombs, shooting and torturing. Of course, they are rewarded as good deeds, and are “hero's”, with parades and little festivals. But we ourselves can't be considered as innocent either. Dead Americans....the executioners are its citizens. We pay for the taxes to build those bombs. We pay the taxes the keep these fucks in power. You want to stop this war, well its easy stop the communication process of money. If money stops flowing, well so does the war.
"I support the murderer, but not the murder."

http://www.strike-the-root.com/columns/rat...attlehead1.html (http://www.strike-the-root.com/columns/rattlehead/rattlehead1.html)

Niemand
24th November 2005, 18:54
Those are quite disturbing images but we must also remember that not all of the troops do agree with the war and some wish that they weren't there and think that this war is wrong. However when you are shipped to Iraq you have to kill, the alternative is to be killed. Some registered before this war and before Bush was "elected", they can do nothing more than kill to survive.