wet blanket
21st November 2005, 15:47
Originally posted by RASH chris+Nov 21 2005, 02:24 PM--> (RASH chris @ Nov 21 2005, 02:24 PM)
wet
[email protected] 21 2005, 10:45 AM
You might want to look into the works of Rudolf Rocker, specifically his work on anarchosyndicalism. Though I should tell you in advance that he was no Marxist, he rejected the marxist concept of the state(citing examples in which the state has been autonomous and even some cases when it has been at odds with the capitalist class), and thought that explaining types of society exclusively in terms of their economic systems is inadequate.
The history of the IWW might be of interest to you as well.
Dude.
I didn't ask for info about anarcho-syndicalism. I've read Rudolf Rocker, that has little to nothing to do with Autonomist Marxism, according to my understanding actually, it's quite contrary to autonomist marxism, as syndicalism is centered around unions and autonomist marxism rejects unions.
The IWW has nothing to do with autonomist marxism, I have many wobbly friends, my house is filled with Industrial Worker newspapers. [/b]
Then perhaps you're looking for the likes of Antonio Negri? I don't think you're going to find any sort of manifesto for 'autonomist marxism' though.
You might also want to look into the situationist international as they are kind of in the same boat as the autonomist marxists, but really, anyone who accepts Marx's critique of capitalism and rejects Leninist organization could be considered an "autonomist marxist" though.
Just a side note: I wouldn't say that anarchosyndicalism and the IWW have nothing to do with autonomist marxism/council communism, they're really quite similar in that they both demand worker-autonomy. Only major difference would be that syndicalism is more industry-focused and emphasizes organized direct action of labour in the form of strikes or sabotage.
In practice the IWW (should) have nothing to do with any political outlook.
I was a member for quite some time and in the constitution and in practice it is made clear that the IWW is made up of people with different political outlooks.
You can't separate politics from industry. The a-political thing is mainly a "recruiting" tool(for lack of a better term). In 'practice' the IWW has violently resisted state repression on several occasions and the constitution calls for worker self-management, these are very political aims and practices. I also have several pamphlets and other literature published by the IWW which are blatantly socialist.