Log in

View Full Version : Berezovsky 'funded revolution'



Comrade Yastrebkov
13th November 2005, 16:35
This small article was in The Independent yesterday:

"Boris Berezovsky, the UK-based Russian oligarch, has embarassed the Ukrainian President Viktor Yuschenko by claiming to have heavily financed last year's Orange Revolution.
Mr Berezovsky said he gave significant funds to Mr Yuschenko's closest associates and he is furious those aides are now denying they took his money. He has also said he wants to know how his monet was spent and is threatening to sue the aides unless they make a personal apology and admit they took his cash. Ukrainian and Russian media claim he gave about $21m (£12m)
Mr Yuschenko's team fear an admission would spoil the public's perception of the event as a spontaneous display of people power. Me Berezovsky's involvement would also confirm a belief that the revolution was aimed at damaging neighbouring Russia's interests. The oligarch is wanted in Russia on various white-collar charges (which he fiercely denies) and is regarded by the Kremlin as an enemy.
In Russian eyes, the revolution was a calculated blow to the nation's prestige. Mr Yuschenko defeated pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych after his supporters proved the rival camp had rigged the election and Moscow lost a great deal of influence.".

At, last we have an element of truth in a mainstream newspaper. On what was the money spent? Yuschenko's son is renowned for owning the best cars, eating in the finest restaurants and gambling in the most prestigious casinos alongside celebrities.

What are your opinions on this, and the Orange "Revolution" in general?

bolshevik butcher
13th November 2005, 17:02
The results of the orange revolution don't seem to have been the big success the ukranian people thought that they were going to get. Yushenko sacked the cabnet a few weeks ago due to corruption, it looks as thoughthings in Ukraine really haven't changed for the better.

Comrade Yastrebkov
13th November 2005, 18:55
True. And I didn't know about the cabinet being sacked. But we know it hasn't changed for the better, the question is, what were the forces that drove the "revolution" - (they certainly weren't the people of Ukraine) and what where their long-term goals.

Severian
14th November 2005, 03:39
"(they certainly weren't the people of Ukraine)"

Which people of Ukraine? Obviously a large part of the population supported the protests, and whatever shadowy forces you're getting at, couldn't have done anything without 'em.

And obviously a large part of the population opposed the protests.

It's no secret that all kinds of pro-capitalist forces supported the "Orange Revolution", precisely because they hoped it would lead to all kinds of privatizations and so forth. Also there were hopes of moving Ukraine out of the Russian sphere of influence, perhaps more realistically.

Whether any of those people have gotten what they want, is more questionable. Here's a thread I started on this a few months back, on the "free market" people's disappointment. (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=35587&hl=ukraine) I don't know what's happened in terms of Ukrainian economic policy since.

Comrade Yastrebkov
14th November 2005, 21:21
Thats what I'm getting at - if all sorts of shadowy pro-capitalist forces supported the revolution, then whether the "revolution" was, as said in the article "a spontaneous display of people power" is highly questionable. These "revolutions" are happening all around Russia, isn't it a little suspicious? Ukraine, Georgia, alleged CIA jails in Poland, missile bases in other former soviet countries that are joining Nato, Russia is being surrounded.