Log in

View Full Version : Nepalese Revolution in National Geographic



bcbm
12th November 2005, 00:12
Interesting article, seemed pretty biased though. Here's an exerpt from their website:

Self-styled Maoist rebels are waging a deadly "people's war" against the king of this Himalayan country, yet it's the people themselves who are suffering.

Get a taste of what awaits you in print from this compelling excerpt.

Comrade Ranju is standing on a sunlit hilltop in western Nepal, telling me how she'd come to kill more than a dozen paramilitary policemen in one night. Dressed in fatigues, she's tall and strong for a 19-year-old Nepali woman, and her straight black hair is scraped back severely from her forehead. For the past three years she's roamed these mountains as a soldier in the Maoist army, whose brutal tactics have spread terror throughout the kingdom.

Ranju is describing an assault in September 2002 in Sindhuli district, 50 miles (80 kilometers) southeast of Nepal's capital, Kathmandu. Her unit was besieging a police station just before midnight. After seeing several comrades gunned down, she came upon a line of policemen. "They didn't surrender," she says. "They were still firing." She claims to have killed 16 or 17 officers with her semiautomatic rifle. In all, 49 police and 21 Maoists were killed.

As she remembers the battle, Ranju becomes so vehement that another rebel steps in to calm her. "We don't kill people if they throw down their arms," he says. "There are many instances of us giving garlands to soldiers and police who surrender." But Ranju's eyes still glare fiercely. Born in eastern Nepal, she'd joined the Maoists at 15 after being harassed by government security forces. Her father had been an active Communist, and she was suspected of contact with the rebels. "People used to point fingers at girls like me," she says, referring to her independent attitude. "Most Nepali women are oppressed. Many end up as prostitutes in Bombay [Mumbai], or are beaten. It has to be changed." The other women soldiers standing near Ranju nod in agreement. She's a natural leader, and I sense that in other circumstances she might have made an excellent teacher—or police officer.

What's happened to Nepal, that young people like Ranju are killing each other with such fervor? And what future does the nation have, now that its ruler, King Gyanendra, has retaken absolute control, ending 12 years of government by political parties? This past February, supported by the Royal Nepalese Army (RNA), the king declared a state of emergency, briefly closing the international airport in Kathmandu, cutting off telephones and e-mail, and placing politicians under house arrest—all in the name of fighting the Maoists. In response, the rebels called a nationwide strike and continued their campaign of violence. The Himalayan kingdom seems poised on the brink.




Its from this months NG, check it out. If I can borrow the copy from my work, I'll scan it.

More Fire for the People
12th November 2005, 01:01
National Geographic is a bourgeois paper based upon a bourgeois interpretation of the world that is apt to believe lies and half-truths.

Guerrilla22
12th November 2005, 02:04
There was an article about the situation in Nepal in Foreign Affairs recently, also.

anomaly
12th November 2005, 03:40
That NG article is b-b-b-bullshit! I've heard far different things about the Nepalese situation. It is not surprising that NG would try to make a group labeled 'Maoist' look so bad.

Scars
12th November 2005, 04:31
On the upside the pictures are nice. The bourgeois press shouldn't be completely disregarded, there are often a few pearls in there and they can often get interviews and the like with people who the 'left wing' media wouldn't be able to, for instance Iraqi guerrillas (Time has printed about half a dozen interviews of such a nature, all of which were interesting. You just have to ignore the bourgeois commentary) and 'world leaders' (Bashir Al-Assad, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez etc). Plus pictures are always good.

Hiero
12th November 2005, 10:40
Self-styled Maoist rebels are waging a deadly "people's war" against the king of this Himalayan country, yet it's the people themselves who are suffering.

There has been quite a few deaths, but most deaths would make up from the government soldiers and the Maoist.

But to say that that "yet it's the people themeselves who are suffering" implies they have nothing to gain, when so far thoos people in Maoist areas would have gained alot.


National Geographic is more interested in societies that have a traditional sense about them. They can sell a magazine that has a story about people living in a caste based hindu kingdom, then a Communist society.

Wanted Man
12th November 2005, 16:09
Hiero > National Geographic. I couldn't agree more. How are the people "suffering" in the Maoist-controlled areas, pray tell? The CPN(m) also plays a great part in women's liberation, which is very important.

Delirium
13th November 2005, 22:31
Originally posted by Diego [email protected] 12 2005, 01:01 AM
National Geographic is a bourgeois paper based upon a bourgeois interpretation of the world that is apt to believe lies and half-truths.
I think you are being a little harsh on National Geographic. If you think they are so bad, how do you manage to read anything at all?

bcbm
13th November 2005, 23:07
How are the people "suffering" in the Maoist-controlled areas, pray tell?

According to the article, the revolution has caused foreign companies to cease projects that would've "brought jobs and money to build infrastructure." They also said that the revolutionaries have stolen food from villages and levy heavy taxes on them, which make it hard for people to survive.

They did mention that much of the criminality associated with the Maoists was probably oppurtunistic bandits, though.