Log in

View Full Version : The school under the bourgeois regime



Led Zeppelin
23rd October 2005, 08:00
The school under the bourgeois regime

In bourgeois society the school has three principal tasks to fulfil. First, it inspires the coming generation of workers with devotion and respect for the capitalist régime. Secondly, it creates from the young of the ruling classes 'cultured' controllers of the working population. Thirdly, it assists capitalist production in the application of sciences to technique, thus increasing capitalist profits.

As regards the first of these tasks, just as in the bourgeois army the 'right spirit' is inculcated by the officers, so in the schools under the capitalist régime the necessary influence is mainly exercised by the caste of 'officers of popular enlightenment'. The teachers in the public elementary schools receive a special course of training by which they are prepared for their role of beast tamers. Only persons who have thoroughly acquired the bourgeois outlook have the entry into the schools as teachers. The ministries of education in the capitalist régime are ever on the watch, and they ruthlessly purge the teaching profession of all dangerous (by which they mean socialist) elements. The German public elementary schools served prior to the revolution as supplements to the barracks of William II, and were shining examples of the way in which the landed gentry and the bourgeoisie can make use of the school for the manufacture of faithful and blind slaves of capital. In the elementary schools of the capitalist régime, instruction is given in accordance with a definite programme perfectly adapted for the breaking-in of the pupils to the capitalist system. All the text-books are written in an appropriate spirit. The whole of bourgeois literature subserves the same end, for it is written by persons who look upon the bourgeois social order as natural, perdurable, and the best of all possible régimes. In this way the scholars are imperceptibly stuffed with bourgeois ideology; they are infected with enthusiasm for all bourgeois virtues; they are inspired with esteem for wealth, renown, titles and order; they aspire to get on in the world, they long for personal comfort, and so on. The work of bourgeois educationists is completed by the servants of the church with their religious instruction. Thanks to the intimate associations between capital and the church, the law of God invariably proves to be the law of the possessing classes. 1)

In capitalist society the second leading aim of bourgeois education is secured by carefully withholding secondary education and higher education from the working masses. Instruction in the middle schools, and still more in the high schools, is extremely costly, so that it is quite beyond the financial resources of the workers. The course of instruction, in middle and higher education, lasts for ten years or more. For this reason it is inaccessible to the worker and the peasant who, in order to feed their families, are compelled to send their children at a very early age to factory work or field work, or else must make the youngsters work at home. In actual practice, the middle and higher schools are the preserves of bourgeois youth. In them, the younger members of the governing classes are trained to succeed their fathers in careers of exploitation, or to fill the official and technical posts of the capitalist State. In these schools, likewise, instruction has a definitely class character. In the domains of mathematics, the technique of industry, and the natural sciences, this may be less striking; but the class character of the teaching is conspicuous in the case of the social sciences, whereby the pupils' outlook on the world is in reality formed. Bourgeois political economy is inculcated with all the most perfected methods for the 'annihilation of Marx'. Sociology and history are likewise taught from a purely capitalist outlook. The history of jurisprudence concludes with the treatment of bourgeois jurisprudence as the natural right of 'the man and the citizen', etc., etc. To sum up, the higher and middle schools teach the children of the capitalists all the data that are requisite for the maintenance of bourgeois society and the whole system of capitalist exploitation. If any of the children of the workers, happening to be exceptionally gifted, should find their way into the higher schools, in the great majority of instances the bourgeois scholastic apparatus will serve as a means of detaching them from their own class kin, and will inoculate them with bourgeois ideology, so that in the long run the genius of these scions of the working class will be turned to account for the oppression of the workers.

Turning, finally, to the third task of capitalist education, we find that the school fulfils it as follows. In a class society where capitalism is dominant, science is divorced from labour. Not only does it become the property of the possessing classes. More than this, it becomes the profession of a small and comparatively narrow circle of individuals. Scientific instruction and scientific research are divorced from the labour process. In order that it may avail itself of the data of science and may turn them to account in production, bourgeois society has to create a number of institutions serving for the application of scientific discoveries to manufacturing technique; and it has to create a number of technical schools which will facilitate the maintenance of production at the level rendered possible by the advance of 'pure' science - by which is meant science divorced from labour. Furthermore, the polytechnic schools of capitalist society do not merely serve to supply capitalist society with technical experts; they supply in addition those who will act as managers, those who will function as 'captains of industry'. In addition, to provide the personnel which will supervise the circulation of commodities, there have been founded numerous commercial schools and academies.

In all these organizations, whatever is linked up with production will endure. But everything which is concerned merely with capitalist production, will die out. There will persist everything which promotes the advancement of science; there will perish that which promotes the severance of science from labour. There will be preserved the methods of technical instruction - but instruction in technical methods altogether apart from the performance of physical labour will be abolished. There will be preserved and extended the utilization of science to further production. On the other hand, any hindrances to such utilization of science, in so far as capital tends to make use of science only to the degree in which at any given moment science tends to raise profits, will be swept out of the way.

The school under the bourgeois regime (http://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1920/abc/10.htm#076)

red_orchestra
23rd October 2005, 09:25
How do you think educators should conduct themselves then? What should they be doing.... reallistically. What would you have them do?
Its all fine and dandy to critize school systems for perpetuating the status quo, but one has to look at a broad spectrum of education systems before tarnishing ALL of them with the same brush. Individual teachers my actually teach critical thinking skills --- question authority, never believe everything you read, never buy into Corperate propaganda, shop Fair Trade, be an activist, stand up for workers rights and unions etc.

Led Zeppelin
23rd October 2005, 09:34
It's funny that you ask, he explains further on what should be done under Socialism/Communism, read the whole Chapter 10: Communism and Education (http://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1920/abc/10.htm)

drain.you
23rd October 2005, 12:17
Out of interest, did the education system change under the USSR? If so, how?
Please tell me it wasn't in the style of the nazis education system, that was just scary.

Led Zeppelin
23rd October 2005, 12:20
Out of interest, did the education system change under the USSR? If so, how?


How about you actually click on the links in my previous posts?

OleMarxco
23rd October 2005, 15:00
How about you actually answer (Personally, you should TRY it sometime) the question's you are faced with, instead of answering with a question or a link? ;) - Which obviously only 'answers' with an explanation on how school is under the 'burgerouise regime' (which mysteriously looks like what you had "written" yourself) - and should generally be under an Communistic society - But not what it was under the USSR!

red_orchestra
23rd October 2005, 18:30
still, this isn't a B&W issue. Educational philosophy is broad....individual teachers may not be promoting the status quo, but the reasearch that you post doesn't include anything like that. It say all teachers are promoting Capitalism.... which is untrue. I know what I teach and it isn't ever promoted Capitalism.

Led Zeppelin
24th October 2005, 03:44
How about you actually answer (Personally, you should TRY it sometime) the question's you are faced with, instead of answering with a question or a link? - Which obviously only 'answers' with an explanation on how school is under the 'burgerouise regime' (which mysteriously looks like what you had "written" yourself) - and should generally be under an Communistic society - But not what it was under the USSR!


No genius, when you click the last link I provided and scroll down you get the chapters: The destructive tasks of communism, The school as an instrument of communist education and enlightenment, Preparation for school life, The unified labour school, Specialist education, The university, Soviet schools and party schools, Extra-scholastic instruction, New workers on behalf of enlightenment, The treasures of art and science made available to the workers, The state propaganda of communism, Popular education under tsarism and under the Soviet Power.

Here is the same link I provided in my last post: Chapter 10: Communism and Education (http://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1920/abc/10.htm), this time read it before asking questions which are already answered in it.

Little Miss Red
2nd November 2005, 23:45
I still go to high school. (when I'm not ill...but that's for another thread)

Part of what you say is true, especially about the army. I have seen recruters outside the gym sometimes, alot of the boys did push-ups and such. I do have alot of respect for the army, the cute Russian boy in my business(what better way to learn about the system?) class studies wars. :wub: I like Eisenhower,Grant,Patton,Ethan Allan.

Whats interesting is that I watched the news and they were talking to this guy from a small town. The army appeals to the peasent class the most because they have few opprotunities to receive high education. G.I bill must be really good.

black magick hustla
3rd November 2005, 23:17
Originally posted by Little Miss [email protected] 2 2005, 11:45 PM
I still go to high school. (when I'm not ill...but that's for another thread)

Part of what you say is true, especially about the army. I have seen recruters outside the gym sometimes, alot of the boys did push-ups and such. I do have alot of respect for the army, the cute Russian boy in my business(what better way to learn about the system?) class studies wars. :wub: I like Eisenhower,Grant,Patton,Ethan Allan.

Whats interesting is that I watched the news and they were talking to this guy from a small town. The army appeals to the peasent class the most because they have few opprotunities to receive high education. G.I bill must be really good.
Holy shit, you admire the most reactionary shit ever.

Morpheus
4th November 2005, 02:23
Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 11:17 AM
Out of interest, did the education system change under the USSR? If so, how?
Yes. It changed by actually having an education system. Before the Russian Revolution most Russians didn't have much in the way of formal education, except sometimes from the church.

Morpheus
4th November 2005, 02:25
Originally posted by [email protected] 23 2005, 05:30 PM
individual teachers may not be promoting the status quo, but the reasearch that you post doesn't include anything like that. It say all teachers are promoting Capitalism.... which is untrue.
Was it true in 1920, when the book was written?