Log in

View Full Version : About 20% of Human Genes Patented



JazzRemington
14th October 2005, 23:14
(From page 1 of the story on National Geographic)

A new study shows that 20 percent of human genes have been patented in the United States, primarily by private firms and universities.

The study, which is reported this week in the journal Science, is the first time that a detailed map has been created to match patents to specific physical locations on the human genome.

Researchers can patent genes because they are potentially valuable research tools, useful in diagnostic tests or to discover and produce new drugs.

"It might come as a surprise to many people that in the U.S. patent system human DNA is treated like other natural chemical products," said Fiona Murray, a business and science professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, and a co-author of the study.

"An isolated DNA sequence can be patented in the same manner that a new medicine, purified from a plant, could be patented if an inventor identifies a [new] application."

Hot Spots

Gene patents were central to the biotech boom of the 1980s and 1990s. The earliest gene patents were obtained around 1978 on the gene for human growth hormone.

The human genome project and the introduction of rapid sequencing techniques brought a deluge of new genetic information and many new patents. Yet there has been little comprehensive research about the extent of gene patenting.

The new study reveals that more than 4,000 genes, or 20 percent of the almost 24,000 human genes, have been claimed in U.S. patents.

Of the patented genes, about 63 percent are assigned to private firms and 28 percent are assigned to universities.

The top patent assignee is Incyte, a Palo Alto, California-based drug company whose patents cover 2,000 human genes.

"Gene patents give their owners property rights over gene sequences—for example in a diagnostic test, as a test for the efficacy of a new drug, or in the production of therapeutic proteins," Murray said.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/20...ene_patent.html (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/10/1013_051013_gene_patent.html)

ÑóẊîöʼn
15th October 2005, 00:25
This illustrates just how fucking stupid the US patent system is. Does this mean I will be able to patent the atmosphere, and charge everyone for breathing it? :rolleyes:

krazzt
17th October 2005, 16:42
I don't know... with a stack of money and an understanding of the US legal system... you could probably patent anything. I submitted a patent for left hands the other day.

Severian
17th October 2005, 18:06
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2005, 06:06 PM
This illustrates just how fucking stupid the US patent system is. Does this mean I will be able to patent the atmosphere, and charge everyone for breathing it? :rolleyes:
No. As the article explains, the patent applies to the use of these genes for manufacturing products, medical tests, etc.

Which is problematic enough, but not the same as patenting the natural use of these genes in human cells.

OleMarxco
17th October 2005, 21:24
Hmm, I am tempted here to say.... HUH!? I can take patent on natural thing's now, eh!? There's no limit's to Capitalism, I see ;) But meh, I like the thought; Let's "buy" and "tax" it! And we'll call it "atmosphere regulation", and give it a fancy name - with a good excuse, like, "necessary move to restrict methane", and "citizens aught to understand that some rights must be curbed to purify the air from any-body public who pollute with their outgassing, since paying elimates those who are can't pay which are the poor which are the most farting group in society now". Y'right :D