Log in

View Full Version : Mr. Bush Compares Islamic Militant ideology . ..



andrew_the_fox
6th October 2005, 18:04
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.ad...006050809990001 (http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20051006050809990001)

Bush Steps Up Defense of Iraq Policy
President Compares Islamic Militant ideology to Communism
By TOM RAUM, AP

AP
President Bush is trying to boost public support for the Iraq war.


WASHINGTON (Oct. 6) - President Bush, trying to reverse a slide in public support for the war in Iraq, said Thursday that Islamic radicals are seeking to "enslave whole nations and intimidate the world," and called that a prime reason not to cut and run in Iraq.

"There's always a temptation in the middle of a long struggle to seek the quiet life, to escape the duties and problems of the world and to hope the enemy grows weary of fanaticism and tired of murder," he said, seeking to address calls from anti-war activists for a U.S. troop withdrawal.

In a speech before the National Endowment for Democracy, Bush said Islamic militants have made Iraq their main front in a war against civilized society.

"The militants believe that controlling one country will rally the Muslim masses, enabling them to overthrow all moderate governments in the region and establish a radical Islamic empire that spans from Spain to Indonesia," Bush said.

The president has been stepping up his defense of his Iraq policy in the face of declining public support for the war and a crucial test in Iraq with the Oct. 15 constitutional referendum.

Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said the speech was "one he should've made a few years ago. I'm glad he made it now."

"I've been saying for a long time the president needs to better define this war," Santorum said.

Bush likened the ideology of Islamic militants to communism. And he said they are being "aided by elements of the Arab news media that incites hatred and anti-Semitism."

"Against such an enemy, there's only one effective response: We never back down, never give in and never accept anything less than complete victory," Bush declared.

He spoke as recent polls show declining American support for the war that has thus far claimed more than 1,940 members of the U.S. military. His Iraq policy faces a crucial test in Iraq's Oct. 15 referendum on a new constitution, a vote that Bush has said terrorists will try to derail.

"We are facing a radical ideology with immeasurable objectives to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world," Bush said.

Bush said the terrorists are aided by corrupt charities that direct money to terrorist activities and nations, such as Syria and Iran, calling them "allies of convenience" that back terrorists.

Countering claims that the U.S. military presence in Iraq is fueling radicalism, Bush noted that American troops were not there on Sept. 11, 2001. He said Russia did not support the military action in Iraq, yet a terrorist attack in Beslan, Russia, left more than 300 schoolchildren dead in 2004.

"The terrorists regard Iraq as the central front in the war against humanity. And we must recognize Iraq as the central front in our war on terror," he said.

"Our commitment is clear -- we will not relent until the organized international terror networks are exposed and broken and their leaders held to account for their acts of murder," Bush said.

The president said that no one should underestimate the difficulties ahead, nor should anyone be pessimistic about U.S. efforts to battle terrorism.

"With every random bombing, and with every funeral of a child, it becomes more clear that the extremists are not patriots, or resistance fighters," Bush said. "They are murderers at war with the Iraqi people themselves."

Bush vowed not to retreat from Iraq or from the broader war on terrorism. "We will keep our nerve and we will win that victory," he said.

10/6/2005 12:14:48

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.


[ ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME ? ]
:rolleyes:

rikaguilera
6th October 2005, 18:45
I was amazed when I heard him utter out this garbage this morning. It only shows how little intelligence he is working with. I started to wonder why this new "idea" of his is now coming into the light. I can only think it is a concearn for the recent notice of China as THE world superpower. There has been quite a bit of reporting on this subject as of recent, and what better time to link them to the al qadea who flew planes into our buildings.
This man needs to gone. This is really out of hand, and his sheeple follow his every word as if it is gospel. Somebody needs to take this man out..

Amusing Scrotum
6th October 2005, 19:17
He said Russia did not support the military action in Iraq, yet a terrorist attack in Beslan, Russia, left more than 300 schoolchildren dead in 2004.


Can you say Chechnya George? :angry:


Somebody needs to take this man out..

Yeah, I asked him if he would like me to take him to dinner and dancing, but the bastard said I wasn't his type. :lol:

ÑóẊîöʼn
6th October 2005, 20:05
Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said the speech was "one he should've made a few years ago. I'm glad he made it now."

Santorum can go fuck himself!

Free Palestine
6th October 2005, 20:05
Somebody needs to take this man out..

Such an act would turn a monkey into a martyr. It would also put Cheney in the Presidential spot and allow the neo-cons to use emotional appeals to their sheep to pass damn near everything they want, and keep the news focused on Der Fuhrer's death 24/7.

novemba
6th October 2005, 20:19
Somebody needs to take this man out..

how about we take THE man out instead...

Ownthink
6th October 2005, 20:31
Establishing an empire that spans the globe? This guys even more delusional than Hitler. Seriously, he's off his fucking cradle. He's going to start WW3 with that mouth, and those guns.


With this moron trying outwardly and deliberaately to fool the word every day with some Newspeak babble about how "Terrorist evildoers want to control the world", I swear, people are going to eventually rise up. Actually, he could be worth that. He finally shows people how dumb he is, and exactly what Capitalism and Imperialism can do if in the right (moronic) hands. His dumbass-ness just might convice people there needs to be a social revolution.

HoorayForTheRedBlackandGreen
6th October 2005, 20:58
I love Bush. Without him, I'd still be an oblivious democrat.

seriously, killing him wouldn't help though. You don't punish killers by killing them, its just hypocritical.

ÑóẊîöʼn
6th October 2005, 21:13
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 08:39 PM
You don't punish killers by killing them, its just hypocritical.
No it isn't. It's the best way to stop them from killing ever again.

Reds
6th October 2005, 21:23
Killing him would not make a diffrence its the leaders of the federal reserve thats the problem.

fukuoka_yakuza
6th October 2005, 21:34
bush is a stupid cracker who makes me ashamed to be from tejas. my country is stupid for reelecting the guy.

"We are facing a radical ideology with immeasurable objectives to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world," you say, eh bush? that sounds a lot like what you're doing now, you stupid cracker!

Ownthink
6th October 2005, 22:05
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 05:15 PM
bush is a stupid cracker who makes me ashamed to be from tejas. my country is stupid for reelecting the guy.

"We are facing a radical ideology with immeasurable objectives to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world," you say, eh bush? that sounds a lot like what you're doing now, you stupid cracker!
No racist terms, please. Yes, even if it against Whites. Racism is still racism. Sorry to burst your bubble, but please don't use that word (or any other racist terms) or you will most likely be continiously warned and then maybe restricted.

Nothing Human Is Alien
6th October 2005, 22:20
Sometimes when a white calls someone a cracker they're talking about a redneck ;)

RedAnarchist
6th October 2005, 22:31
I just read somewhere that Bush said that God told him to invade Iraq! :blink:

I'll try to find something on the Internet about this.

RedAnarchist
6th October 2005, 22:43
Bush Hears the Voice Of God&#33; (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_7-10-2005_pg1_3) <_<

Reds
6th October 2005, 23:12
God talks to me all the time he is red with horns and a viper-gated tail or is that the other guy?

ÑóẊîöʼn
7th October 2005, 08:54
Originally posted by Ownthink+Oct 6 2005, 09:46 PM--> (Ownthink @ Oct 6 2005, 09:46 PM)
[email protected] 6 2005, 05:15 PM
bush is a stupid cracker who makes me ashamed to be from tejas. my country is stupid for reelecting the guy.

"We are facing a radical ideology with immeasurable objectives to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world," you say, eh bush? that sounds a lot like what you&#39;re doing now, you stupid cracker&#33;
No racist terms, please. Yes, even if it against Whites. Racism is still racism. Sorry to burst your bubble, but please don&#39;t use that word (or any other racist terms) or you will most likely be continiously warned and then maybe restricted. [/b]
Ownthink, shut up. As a white person, I find the term "cracker" to be as insulting as being called a poopoohead.

Latifa
7th October 2005, 09:13
I thought God was supposed to be about loving your fellow man, not fucking smashing down his city with a mortar. Stupid Bush, perhaps he&#39;s on crack again.

Nothing Human Is Alien
7th October 2005, 09:57
I thought God was supposed to be about loving your fellow man, not fucking smashing down his city with a mortar.

Apparently you haven&#39;t read the Bible.

Sabocat
7th October 2005, 10:25
God talks to me all the time he is red with horns and a viper-gated tail or is that the other guy?

Don&#39;t you mean bifurcated? ;)

bunk
7th October 2005, 11:18
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2005, 08:35 AM
Ownthink, shut up. As a white person, I find the term "cracker" to be as insulting as being called a poopoohead.
Are you representative?

h&s
7th October 2005, 14:28
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 10:24 PM
Bush Hears the Voice Of God&#33; (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_7-10-2005_pg1_3) <_<
Aren&#39;t we meant to lock up people who say they hear voices? :P

Anarchist Freedom
7th October 2005, 15:07
Wow I want nothing more that to punch george bush square in the nose.

ÑóẊîöʼn
7th October 2005, 15:46
Originally posted by Josh+Oct 7 2005, 10:59 AM--> (Josh @ Oct 7 2005, 10:59 AM)
[email protected] 7 2005, 08:35 AM
Ownthink, shut up. As a white person, I find the term "cracker" to be as insulting as being called a poopoohead.
Are you representative? [/b]
I don&#39;t know, that would depend on how many people are overly sensitive PC pricks.

Amusing Scrotum
7th October 2005, 19:15
Aren&#39;t we meant to lock up people who say they hear voices?

Haven&#39;t you heard, hearing voices is the new black. All guys and gals who are at all hip, hear the big man in their head. :lol:

Ownthink
7th October 2005, 20:20
Originally posted by NoXion+Oct 7 2005, 11:27 AM--> (NoXion @ Oct 7 2005, 11:27 AM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2005, 10:59 AM

[email protected] 7 2005, 08:35 AM
Ownthink, shut up. As a white person, I find the term "cracker" to be as insulting as being called a poopoohead.
Are you representative?
I don&#39;t know, that would depend on how many people are overly sensitive PC pricks. [/b]
Or how many people are moronic assholes like yourself.

"Cracker" is just as bad as "honkey". It&#39;s racist, quit trying to defend it. If you don&#39;t believe it&#39;s racist, then wow, you&#39;re either really dumb or really naive.

ÑóẊîöʼn
7th October 2005, 20:25
I don&#39;t find "honkey" offensive either. And neither should people who share my ethnicity. Because quite frankly, there is nothing to get offended about.

If a black racist tries to harm my person I will defend myself, but if he calls me names then he&#39;s just making himself look foolish.

Ownthink
7th October 2005, 20:30
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2005, 04:06 PM
I don&#39;t find "honkey" offensive either. And neither should people who share my ethnicity. Because quite frankly, there is nothing to get offended about.

If a black racist tries to harm my person I will defend myself, but if he calls me names then he&#39;s just making himself look foolish.
Telling your ethnicity how to feel? It is largely known that the terms "honkey" and "cracker" are the counters to White Racism against minorities, and are meant to be derrogatory terms against Whites.

bcbm
7th October 2005, 21:48
As a "white" person, I use the term "cracker" to refer to racist, white morons. Maybe that isn&#39;t representative, but I&#39;ve never taken offense at it.

Ownthink
7th October 2005, 22:12
Originally posted by black banner black [email protected] 7 2005, 05:29 PM
As a "white" person, I use the term "cracker" to refer to racist, white morons. Maybe that isn&#39;t representative, but I&#39;ve never taken offense at it.
Well, there is two interpretations to it, although both representative of negativity against Whites.

One is meant as "cracker" because Racist slave masters used to crack their whips, and the other meaning is because a cracker is white, and so is a White person.

Both have negative meanings toward whites, but if you say "That Racist is a cracker" than that may imply that he is of a racist opinion or attitude, and therefor would be a "whip cracker" if slavery still existed. I wouldn&#39;t take this use of the word offensive at all.

Take it as you may.

Xvall
8th October 2005, 00:45
George should be locked in an Asylum.

Tekun
8th October 2005, 01:37
Its just double talk and babble used to manipulate and brainwash the masses who saw or see socialism as anti-american/anti-christian
And, unfortunately the masses are eating up this garbage

What I will say about the Islamic Militant ideology is that their reactionists
They don&#39;t sit around hoping things change, they take action
Despite flawed and evil methods that I condemn

Instead of cappin his ass, we should fire bullets of truth at him
Inform the people, and the people will react (well, those oppressed anyways)

workersunity
8th October 2005, 08:04
Im writing an analysis of this article and such on my blog

www.myspace.com/deleonist

D_Bokk
9th October 2005, 10:19
When leaders begin to use Propaganda lies about Communism, it usually means Communism is becoming a threat. With that said, I guess this is good news... we just need to work harder to make sure these lies do not become truth in the eyes of the Proletariat.