Log in

View Full Version : Anachro-what the hell?



Pete
24th December 2002, 23:33
Instead of looking in a dictionary and disturbing my brothers cat that is sitting on me, I feel it convient to ask what does 'Anachro' mean. I've seen it used as in anchro-socialism anchro-anarchy and anchro-capitatlism. Please explain

Xvall
25th December 2002, 00:24
Anarcho is just something to be put before a certain economic ideology. (Anarcho-Socialism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Anarcho-Crapitalism, etc.) It generally implies the desire for an eventually stateless society.

Dr. Rosenpenis
25th December 2002, 02:52
It means the exact same thing as anarchy, I suppose you know what anarchy is.

Pete
25th December 2002, 02:59
many thanks:D

synthesis
25th December 2002, 08:05
If you've taken the political compass test, the prefix anarcho represents the bottom (the negative Y axis) of the results chart.

If you are on the bottom left, you are an anarcho-communist. (Mikhail Bakunin, for example.) If you are on the bottom right, you are an anarcho-capitalist. (The Libertarian party, for example.)

Just wanted to try to give a better clarification

Blackberry
26th December 2002, 02:01
Quote: from DyerMaker on 8:05 am on Dec. 25, 2002
If you've taken the political compass test, the prefix anarcho represents the bottom (the negative Y axis) of the results chart.

If you are on the bottom left, you are an anarcho-communist. (Mikhail Bakunin, for example.) If you are on the bottom right, you are an anarcho-capitalist. (The Libertarian party, for example.)

Just wanted to try to give a better clarification

Read this page on 'anarcho'-capitalism. (http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1931/secFcon.html)

Pete
26th December 2002, 02:40
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -9.00
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -8.77

So that means I am an anachro-communist?

Dr. Rosenpenis
26th December 2002, 02:46
Theres a bit more involved, like how you plan to get there, how the system will work once you're there, such. Not every libertarian Communist is an anarchist.

Umoja
26th December 2002, 02:53
All Communist (And Socialist) seek Anarchy as the last stage of human development, even though I think it's foolish considering we are never going to get Utopia.

Xvall
26th December 2002, 03:05
Your compass tells you where you stand. Friend. Don't let a fucking compass decide your political ideology. Choose where you stand yourself. You don't need some program to tell you that. All the compass is saying is that you are more libertarian; both economically and politically. I can assume from it, that you are not a capitalist, or authortarian. Decide where you stand for yourself.

Pete
27th December 2002, 01:37
I prefer not to fall in to a prescribed catergory. I was using my score to see if that is the catergory of a certain thing. Catergories are a stereotype and nobody fits a steroetype perfectly.

El Brujo
27th December 2002, 02:12
Anarchism couldn't possibly work in todays society. It's a romantic movement that assumes people are generally good and won't take advantage of each other. If big businesses take advantage of workers today where there is government authority (granted its a government authority that favours the crooked big businesses), imagine how it would be in a lawless society. It would end up being lassiez-faire in its purest form because the rich and the mobs would control everything and be able to do whatever they want without a chance of getting into shit with the authority.

Blackberry
27th December 2002, 09:52
Quote: from El Brujo on 2:12 am on Dec. 27, 2002
Anarchism couldn't possibly work in todays society. It's a romantic movement that assumes people are generally good and won't take advantage of each other. If big businesses take advantage of workers today where there is government authority (granted its a government authority that favours the crooked big businesses), imagine how it would be in a lawless society. It would end up being lassiez-faire in its purest form because the rich and the mobs would control everything and be able to do whatever they want without a chance of getting into shit with the authority.

If anarchism doesn't work, so doesn't communism, and so doesn't socialism. And if anarchy doesn't work, then there goes Marx's theory out of the window.

So let's just stick with capitalism, shall we?

(Edited by Neutral Nation at 9:54 am on Dec. 27, 2002)

Sirion
27th December 2002, 12:17
Where can I find this compass?

Pete
27th December 2002, 16:29
compass (http://www.politicalcompass.org)

BOZG
27th December 2002, 19:21
All Communist (And Socialist) seek Anarchy as the last stage of human development, even though I think it's foolish considering we are never going to get Utopia

Do anarchists believe in a perfect society? No! So get it into your head that anarchists do not believe in utopias.

El Brujo
28th December 2002, 05:01
Quote: from Neutral Nation on 5:52 pm on Dec. 27, 2002

Quote: from El Brujo on 2:12 am on Dec. 27, 2002
Anarchism couldn't possibly work in todays society. It's a romantic movement that assumes people are generally good and won't take advantage of each other. If big businesses take advantage of workers today where there is government authority (granted its a government authority that favours the crooked big businesses), imagine how it would be in a lawless society. It would end up being lassiez-faire in its purest form because the rich and the mobs would control everything and be able to do whatever they want without a chance of getting into shit with the authority.

If anarchism doesn't work, so doesn't communism, and so doesn't socialism. And if anarchy doesn't work, then there goes Marx's theory out of the window.

So let's just stick with capitalism, shall we?

(Edited by Neutral Nation at 9:54 am on Dec. 27, 2002)


Nope. A proper marxist revolution would supress the right and maintain prosperity for the proletariat. As long as there is opposition, anarchism can't work because the right will forcefully take over. Unless there are many years (possibly centuries) of proletarian dictatorship in the whole world and the masses are thoroughly converted to the marxist ideal, anarchism will undoubtedly go bad (and maybe even then it wouldn't work because the people's greedy instincts might get the best of them. An anarchistic utopia can only work if 100% of the world population comply with it without force, so if one person becomes greedy, it will have a "domino effect").