Log in

View Full Version : R.A.A.N.



Nachie
22nd September 2005, 17:59
http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/uploads/post-7-1127408541.jpg

Addressing all anarchists, autonomists, libertarian communists, anti-authoritarians, revolutionary workers, students, squatters, and all others who insist that our mutual struggle for a non-hierarchal society take place outside the current one,

Although I originally came to this forum looking for help with a Spanish translation, I thought it might be interesting to start a discussion on a project I've been involved with for the past three years, the Red & Anarchist Action Network (RAAN).

Formed through a series of debates and constructive dialogues on forums much like this one, RAAN seeks first and foremost to dismantle the artificial gaps between anarchisms of all tendencies and the traditions of anti-state communism, thus cleansing "communism" and Marxism from the massive genocidal distortions to which they have been subjected, and in the process perhaps reclaiming a couple other concepts which have been more recently hijacked - for example, "freedom" and "liberty". We propose to do this by setting out a groundwork of common principles related to anti-capitalism/anti-authoritarianism, and then using that base as a way of strengthening the whole as each individual involved builds upon their own theoretical traditions and immediately relevant, personally fulfilling struggles. We are not regimented like a traditional political party, and instead opt for the TOTAL autonomy of all collectives, cells, and participants within the stated principles. Wherever enough interest or need exists for a certain initiative on our part, we believe that this interest will be sufficient to ensure that the project gets done.

It's obviously a very nuanced approach - drawn directly from the most effective clandestine "direct action" networks - but applied to the totality of struggle as we seek to develop fluid ways of organizing ourselves against our enemies. There are a wide array of discussions one could engage in on how to properly implement this vision, but to begin with I think it will be sufficient to introduce everyone to the three major documents of RAAN, which together may paint a more complete picture of just what the hell I'm talking about:

The RAAN Principles & Direction (http://raan.yardapes.net/publications/principles.html) - The P&D is the founding and principal document of RAAN. Written collectively over many months, it is the product of hundreds of debates and lays out the network's most uncompromising points of unity.

The RAAN Principles of Action (http://raan.yardapes.net/pn/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=26) - The PofA arose out of the accelerating activity of RAAN, and was the final network-wide document created before total decentralization. This text sets out in explicit detail the system of autonomous action through affiliation that characterizes the network's tendency.

The RAAN Principes of Organization (http://raan.yardapes.net/pn/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=10&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0) - The PofO lays out the seven principles of RAAN for those who want to organize a network-affiliated presence in their area. Tips on how to go about that are also included.

I would also strongly recommend my own essay, The Functioning of a Network: A "No Bullshit" Policy VS. The Lethargy of Activism (http://raan.yardapes.net/pn/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=28), as it builds our articulation of the unique methods by which RAAN organizes its activity, specifically the idea that the network itself does not physically exist save for in the precise moments when actions are being carried out in its name.

I hope that this is not seen as a recruitment drive on my part. From my brief time on this forum I've noticed a preponderence of Leninists who will - with justification - be entirely hostile to RAAN. I am in no way trying to convert you, and ask in return only that you make no attempts at converting me. I do however wish to stimulate discussion on how an effective national/international tendency would go about conceiving of itself and dealing with the sustained contradictions of its own existence. Given the complete fossilization of the vanguardist Party, the rapid decay of formalized anarchist groups, and the inadequacy of individualist practice, it is more important than ever for us to deal with these issues, and deal with them in a way that is consistent with our vision of the future.

More information about RAAN can be found at http://www.redanarchist.org

"The State is a condition, a certain relationship between human beings, a mode of human behavior; we destroy it by contracting other relationships, by behaving differently." -Gustav Landauer

The Feral Underclass
23rd September 2005, 00:05
I think any network of anarchists who work together on direct action is a good idea. One fundamental criticism though...


Originally posted by [email protected] 22 2005, 06:30 PM
"The State is a condition, a certain relationship between human beings, a mode of human behavior; we destroy it by contracting other relationships, by behaving differently." -Gustav Landauer

No it's not a "condition". It's a material [specific] collection of "tools" used by a ruling class to maintain its political, ideological and economic control.

You can only destroy it by fighting those tools until they are destroyed. by removing their power and smashing their control. Terms like "relationship" are idealist and completely unrelated to the actual conditions of the state.

Nachie
23rd September 2005, 01:58
Luckily for me your one fundamental criticism isn't related to the actual network, just the little quote I spontaneously added to the end of the post :D

That said, I agree with you in spirit but don't think it invalidates what Mr. Landauer was saying. This is just a good example of semantic gymnastics. Engels of course defined the state as an armed body of men (and thus politically neutral until given substance by its own actions/intent) and though the anarchist theory of this century has also tended to define the capital-S State as being based out of capital's violent and pre-emptive self defense, it draws attention to the fact that it therefore also encompasses the entire range of oppressive, hierarchal structures in society and our everyday lives, not all of which are overtly violent, but all of which serve to safeguard the continuity of a violent condition (the capitalist mode of production).

Let me quote from the Principles of RAAN,


We see arrayed before us the modern bourgeois state, supreme defender of the capitalist system. It coerces us into voting by promising that change is possible "from the inside", it imprisons and shoots us when we dare to rise against it, and most hideous of all, it ensures the sanctity of private property and authority by its very purpose and existence.

But the state is only a physical representation of the system of hierarchies we live under in everyday life. These hierarchies are themselves an extension of capitalism, since social relations of competition must inevitably force us into castes of rulers and ruled. Any critique of the capitalist system that fails to take this into account is destined either for failure or authoritarianism. All hierarchies, whether they are found in the workplace, the classroom, the political organization, or even (and especially) our personal relationships, must be dismantled if our "free association of human beings" is to take root.
So yes it is a collection of "tools", but tools used to defend a certain "condition" (or conditions), thus inseperable from that condition. If we were only to recognize the state as the police force or union bureaucracy or electoral politics for instance, we might only succeed in duping ourselves into a self-managed, and therefore more efficient, capitalism (change the tools, not the condition).

"Behaving differently" and "contracting other relationships" sounds very tame but of course one could also understand them to mean - depending on one's definition of the state - anything from confronting ones ingrained homophobia to an open warfare against the armed bodies of capital. My own understanding is that it would encompass both definitions. I also object to your discarding of the word "relationship" since I see no practical purpose in this? There is a "relationship" between myself and a police officer, just as there is a certain "relationship" between myself and my boss. These "relationships" define the "condition", which in turn defines the "tools" needed to defend it.

I apologize if I've taken this thread out of the practical and into the theoretical, it was not my intent.

OleMarxco
24th September 2005, 14:24
Well, maybe it already should be moved to such forums, just in case ;)
The path to the theoretical side, is an short...and...easy one. Yeah, that's
it. </Dropsfilmquotebookwithstarwarsontheinsidecoverside>

But as for RAAN (Almost sound&#39;s like "Ran" in Norwegian, which ironicly mean "Robbery" ~~ Which we even could probably do, heck, of burgerouise&#39;s that is. Just gimme a call if you start one&#33;) I would not have anything against siding with this particular group at all.
I&#39;ve seen that this group has previously aided Crimethinc before....but is a bit opposed to certaint elements of them? Aslong as it&#39;s not too openly secretarian, then I&#39;m fine. We don&#39;t need too much in-fightin&#39;.

JC1
24th September 2005, 15:42
Well, maybe it already should be moved to such forums, just in case
The path to the theoretical side, is an short...and...easy one. Yeah, that&#39;s
it. </Dropsfilmquotebookwithstarwarsontheinsidecoverside>

I hate to be rude, but does anyone care/respond/understand any of youre post&#39;s ? Indeed, do you ever have somthing usefull to say ?

OleMarxco
24th September 2005, 16:51
Wow, you really had to quote my post, just in case the text would "mysteriously" disappear, even though everyone would understand you spoke to me who was just
before you, eh? Like, uh, everyone suspects me of removing the content after writing
to make someone look like a jerk, but I don&#39;t...yet. So, to answer your query....

Maybe not, but does that me anything worse than Nachia&#39;s (slightly more polite) diversion? :P What we say does not matter, so do not try to hide the fact you hate everything I represent - I accept that ;)

It&#39;s not like you waited for that response to come, anyways.
But you&#39;re right....I could be, but the most logical thing to say was that.
"caring" and "understanding", burgerouise boolshit.....I don&#39;t want to be
cared for understood, as either, just...well, read :D

And as you might see, when my post&#39;s at first glance has no particular meaning...
To an un-trained eye, that is.... I usually get back to&#39;rem and edit them to be more,
uh, eh, meaningful. Yeah, &#39;rats it. WITH PURPOSE&#33; MUAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH&#33; :)

Snitza
26th September 2005, 02:02
Nachie,

I read through a few parts of the R.A.A.N. website, and I find all of it very inviting and akin where I stand. Is there a Pennsylvania based RAAN group, or any other RAAN group in the area I can get in touch with?

Nachie
26th September 2005, 02:27
You know I don&#39;t think there is...

One of us who went by the name HJ Matroni who was working on some sort of community space that just opened in a relatively small town in PA but for whatever reason I can&#39;t remember what town it was or what the space was called.

You might have some luck around the anarchist community in DC, but for the most part we&#39;re still pretty spread out except in a couple cities like Cincinnati. Most of RAAN&#39;s actions have been coming anonymously out of all sorts of places, though. To a large degree there&#39;s been a drift away from the formation of above-ground collectives...

Try e-mailing [email protected] though, and he can probably send you pamphlets and stuff like that for you to copy + distro. I know there are stickers getting printed too and though that usually takes a few weeks once they&#39;re ready we can probably send you some of those.

novemba
26th September 2005, 02:55
do you guys really have connections with crimethinc? if so what kind?

also what do revlefters think about RAAN?

Guest
28th September 2005, 01:34
cop

JC1
28th September 2005, 02:19
I agree with the prognois of our guest. He did ask a contentless, specific, unwarranted (Where did anyone mention Crimthinc) question. Beware.

CaptianAnarchy
28th September 2005, 02:22
lol JC1 i agree with the gest aswell u dont talk about illegal stuff on the net novemba

Nachie
28th September 2005, 04:23
"connections" with CrimethInc.? I think I said in another thread that a lot of us helped distribute "Fighting For Our Lives" when it came out, but that&#39;s something practically every anarchist in the US did at the time (2002 or so?). I think I mentioned my personal thoughts on some of their books, that&#39;s about it...

I hear one of our boys from the Columbus area had helped put together one of their magazines (I forget which one since I was never involved) but that&#39;s probably about as much of a "connection" with CrimethInc. as we have.

CrimethInc. is more or less a publishing group. They put on travelling circuses and stuff but people don&#39;t really claim actions for them or (at least I don&#39;t think) organize CrimethInc. collectives - other than to do distros, that is. Actually a lot of our zines and stuff have criticized CrimethInc. and even more so RAAN has been criticizing the anarcho-punk connection almost since we got started. I&#39;d say nowadays that most of the RAANites active through our Internet hub are hostile to CrimethInc. (it&#39;s just a watered-down, punked-out Situationist International). But I can&#39;t speak for everyone in the network and as I mentioned above I know at least some people in RAAN have helped them before. The nice thing is that this contradiction is totally within our principles and in no way hinders us. My only concern is that people devote their energies towards furthering CrimethInc.&#39;s agenda instead of building RAAN as a force in its own right. But I have to give CrimethInc. props because the only reason they&#39;re able to monopolize anarchist discourse to the extent that they have is that they&#39;ve just been able to publish a TON of really accessible stuff, even if a lot of it is pretty romantically vapid.

Oh, here&#39;s the thread where I was talking about RAAN and CrimethInc. "By Way Of Introduction" (http://www.revolutionaryleft.com/index.php?showtopic=40768&hl=)

So yeah, there&#39;s not some amazing connection, because CrimethInc. isn&#39;t even an organization you can exactly "join" (unless you&#39;re gonna write it on your skateboard or something...) And there&#39;s certainly nothing illegal about distroing their lit so I have no problem saying we&#39;ve done that in the past.

I would encourage people interested in organizing or acting within the RAAN tendency to do it based on their own ideas of what&#39;s effective as far as anticapitalist struggle and personal relevancy, not CrimethInc.&#39;s

---------------------------------------

Uy, I just re-read this post and it&#39;s pretty scattered. Sorry I&#39;m just tired right now so I&#39;m in no shape to really articulate my thoughts. If you all still have questions about CrimethInc. I&#39;m happy to answer them as best as I can (in the capacity of someone who really doesn&#39;t fuck with them) but I&#39;d much rather see some discussion about how the principles of RAAN can be used towards building a hydra-headed, multi-front, multi-tendency resistance that nevertheless acts under the same banner and is able to support all types of different initiatives...

novemba
28th September 2005, 06:36
cop

shut the fuck up. people on this board know me personally.


I agree with the prognois of our guest. He did ask a contentless, specific, unwarranted...question. Beware.

same goes for you...

:angry: :angry: <_<


(Where did anyone mention Crimthinc)


Originally posted by OLEMARXCO FROM THIS SAME FUCKIN THREAD
I&#39;ve seen that this group has previously aided Crimethinc before


dont talk about illegal stuff on the net

since when was crimethinc illegal to talk about?

WHY AM I GETTING SO MANY COMMENTS ON THAT POST?


there&#39;s not some amazing connection

ok, just curious got sort of a sister organization vibe from it, nvm though.